NYK #00 エネス・フリーダムEnes Freedom Enes Freedom

71 G

25.8

PPG14.1

RPG11.0

APG1.5

SPG0.5

BPG0.5

FG%59.2

3P%0.0

FT%84.8

GFC211cm/111kg6'11"/245lbTurkeyThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 71 games / 25.8 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 23.9Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 63.0%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 21.2%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 2.93km1.82mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.16 / Def 6.68 km/hOff 4.45 / Def 4.15 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim62Paint17Mid-range63P0FT16

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition7PnR19Iso / Post26Spot up2Cut / Screen15Putback25Other7

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested26Off. free8Def. contested19Def. free47

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"4190–198cm6'3"–6'6"8198–206cm6'6"–6'9"12206cm and up6'9" and up76

Offense

Post Player

Defense

Inside Defender

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

BScoringTop 14.0%(#55 of 392)

PTS / 100 possessions

B2P finishingTop 14.2%(#55 of 386)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

—3P finishingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

BFT shootingTop 13.5%(#51 of 378)

FT%

On-ball

DPlaymakingTop 63.5%(#248 of 392)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

EHalf-court creationTop 89.3%(#275 of 308)

Frequency

Efficiency

—DrivingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

—

DBall securityTop 63.0%(#247 of 392)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

BCuttingTop 23.8%(#71 of 298)

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

BScreeningTop 14.8%(#58 of 392)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

SReboundingTop 1.3%(#5 of 392)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

BRebound conversionTop 17.3%(#68 of 392)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

SBox-outsTop 0.5%(#2 of 392)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

GOn-ball defenseTop 99.5%(#390 of 392)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

BRim protectionTop 15.8%(#55 of 349)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

EHustleTop 87.0%(#341 of 392)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2011-12	UTA	C	19	66	13.2	D	D	—	E	G						A
2012-13	UTA	C	20	70	15.4	B	B	—	C	E	E			C		B
2013-14	UTA	C	21	80	26.7	B	C	—	D	E	F	D	E	D		B	D
2014-15	UTA/OKC	C	22	75	28.5	B	C	—	C	F	E	C	D	A		A	D
2015-16	OKC	C	23	82	21.0	A	B	—	C	G	E	—	D	A		S	C
2016-17	OKC	C	24	72	21.3	A	B	—	C	D	D	C	G	D	C	A	D			B
2017-18	NYK	C	25	71	25.8	B	B	—	B	D	E	—	D	B	B	S	B	S	G	B	E	POSTID
2018-19	NYK/POR	C	26	67	24.5	B	D	—	C	C	E	D	E	B	B	A	E	A	E	B	F	POST
2019-20	BOS	C	27	58	16.9	C	C	—	E	D	—	—	E	B	A	S	E	A	G	B	E	POST
2020-21	POR	C	28	72	24.4	C	C	—	D	E	—	—	C	B	A	S	E	S	G	B	F	ID
2021-22	BOS	—	29	35	11.7	E	D	—	C	G	—	—	E	—	S	A	D	A	E	—	G	POST

View

422 / 713(59.2%)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	461	308	66.8%	63.1%	+3.7
Paint · Center	174	82	47.1%	38.4%	+8.8
Mid-range · Left	22	9	40.9%	40.2%	+0.7
Mid-range · Center	17	7	41.2%	42.4%	−1.2
Mid-range · Right	13	8	61.5%	40.9%	+20.6
Mid-range · Left wing	9	3	33.3%	39.6%	−6.3
Mid-range · Right wing	8	1	12.5%	39.1%	−26.6
Paint · Left	6	4	66.7%	39.8%	+26.9
Above the break 3 · Center	2	0	0.0%	36.0%	−36.0
Paint · Right	1	0	0.0%	40.5%	−40.5

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2011-12	UTA	C	19	66	0	13.2	1.8	3.6	49.6	1.8	3.6	49.8	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.1	1.6	66.7	1.6	2.6	4.2	0.1	0.3	0.3	0.8	1.3	4.6
2012-13	UTA	C	20	70	2	15.4	2.9	5.4	54.4	2.9	5.4	54.2	0.0	0.0	100.0	1.3	1.7	79.5	1.9	2.4	4.3	0.4	0.4	0.5	1.4	1.7	7.2
2013-14	UTA	C	21	80	37	26.7	5.2	10.7	49.1	5.2	10.7	49.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.9	2.6	73.0	2.8	4.7	7.5	0.9	0.4	0.5	1.8	2.9	12.3
2014-15	UTA/OKC	C	22	75	74	28.5	6.4	12.4	51.9	6.2	11.8	52.8	0.2	0.6	35.6	2.4	3.1	78.2	3.7	5.3	8.9	0.7	0.5	0.4	1.9	2.5	15.5
	UTA			49	48	27.1	5.8	11.9	49.1	5.6	11.0	50.5	0.3	0.8	31.7	1.9	2.4	78.8	3.0	4.8	7.8	0.5	0.5	0.3	1.9	2.3	13.8
	OKC			26	26	31.1	7.5	13.3	56.6	7.4	13.2	56.4	0.1	0.2	75.0	3.5	4.5	77.6	5.0	6.0	11.0	1.1	0.5	0.5	2.0	2.9	18.7
2015-16	OKC	C	23	82	1	21.0	5.0	8.8	57.6	4.9	8.5	57.9	0.1	0.3	47.6	2.4	3.1	79.7	3.0	5.1	8.1	0.4	0.3	0.4	1.4	2.0	12.7
2016-17	OKC	C	24	72	0	21.3	5.6	10.2	54.5	5.5	9.7	56.8	0.1	0.5	13.2	3.1	4.0	78.6	2.7	4.0	6.7	0.9	0.4	0.5	1.7	2.1	14.3
2017-18	NYK	C	25	71	71	25.8	5.9	10.0	59.2	5.9	10.0	59.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.2	2.6	84.8	3.8	7.1	11.0	1.5	0.5	0.5	1.7	2.6	14.1
2018-19	NYK/POR	C	26	67	31	24.5	5.6	10.2	54.9	5.4	9.7	56.2	0.1	0.5	29.4	2.3	2.9	78.7	3.8	6.0	9.8	1.7	0.5	0.4	1.8	2.5	13.7
	NYK			44	23	25.6	5.7	10.6	53.6	5.5	10.1	54.7	0.2	0.5	31.8	2.4	2.9	81.4	3.9	6.6	10.5	1.9	0.4	0.4	1.8	2.4	14.0
	POR			23	8	22.3	5.4	9.3	57.7	5.3	8.8	59.6	0.1	0.5	25.0	2.2	3.0	73.5	3.7	4.9	8.6	1.4	0.6	0.4	1.7	2.7	13.1
2019-20	BOS	C	27	58	7	16.9	3.4	6.0	57.2	3.4	5.9	58.1	0.0	0.1	14.3	1.2	1.7	70.7	2.8	4.6	7.4	1.0	0.4	0.7	1.0	1.7	8.1
2020-21	POR	C	28	72	35	24.4	4.7	7.8	60.4	4.7	7.7	60.7	0.0	0.1	25.0	1.8	2.3	77.4	3.9	7.1	11.0	1.2	0.5	0.7	1.1	2.3	11.2
2021-22	BOS	—	29	35	1	11.7	1.5	2.8	52.6	1.4	2.6	53.3	0.1	0.1	40.0	0.7	0.8	85.7	1.7	2.8	4.6	0.2	0.1	0.4	0.6	1.2	3.7

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2011-12	UTA	C	19	4	0	10.8	1.8	4.0	43.8	1.8	4.0	43.8	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.3	0.0	2.0	2.0	4.0	0.3	0.0	1.0	1.0	1.8	3.5
2012-13	UTA	C	20	Missed the playoffs
2013-14	UTA	C	21	Missed the playoffs
2014-15	UTA/OKC	C	22	Missed the playoffs
	UTA			49	48	27.1	5.8	11.9	49.1	5.6	11.0	50.5	0.3	0.8	31.7	1.9	2.4	78.8	3.0	4.8	7.8	0.5	0.5	0.3	1.9	2.3	13.8
	OKC			26	26	31.1	7.5	13.3	56.6	7.4	13.2	56.4	0.1	0.2	75.0	3.5	4.5	77.6	5.0	6.0	11.0	1.1	0.5	0.5	2.0	2.9	18.7
2015-16	OKC	C	23	18	0	17.9	3.6	6.6	55.1	3.5	5.8	60.6	0.1	0.8	14.3	2.1	2.5	84.4	2.6	3.6	6.2	0.3	0.3	0.6	0.9	2.2	9.4
2016-17	OKC	C	24	5	0	9.0	2.0	5.2	38.5	2.0	5.2	38.5	0.0	0.0	—	0.8	0.8	100.0	0.6	1.2	1.8	0.2	0.0	0.8	0.4	1.6	4.8
2017-18	NYK	C	25	Missed the playoffs
2018-19	POR	C	26	16	14	28.8	4.7	9.1	51.4	4.6	8.9	52.1	0.1	0.3	25.0	1.9	2.6	75.6	3.3	6.4	9.6	1.2	0.7	0.6	1.6	2.3	11.4
2019-20	BOS	C	27	11	0	9.3	2.0	3.8	52.4	1.9	3.7	51.2	0.1	0.1	100.0	0.5	0.9	50.0	1.7	2.2	3.9	0.6	0.0	0.0	0.4	1.7	4.5
2020-21	POR	C	28	5	0	11.2	0.8	1.6	50.0	0.8	1.6	50.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.4	0.4	100.0	1.2	1.4	2.6	0.0	0.0	0.4	0.6	1.8	2.0
2021-22	BOS	—	29	Did not play

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2011-12	UTA	C	19	66	13.2	14.5	53.9	49.6	16.4	1.6	15.9	11.8	20.2	15.7	94.0	102.4	-8.4	94.2	11.0	1,724
2012-13	UTA	C	20	70	15.4	17.6	58.8	54.5	20.6	5.0	14.0	12.5	15.5	17.9	103.1	98.0	5.1	95.8	13.0	2,154
2013-14	UTA	C	21	80	26.7	15.6	52.3	49.1	22.8	6.4	14.6	10.3	19.5	12.4	99.8	112.0	-12.2	92.8	10.1	4,147
2014-15	UTA/OKC	C	22	75	28.5	20.3	56.4	52.8	23.8	4.4	15.9	12.8	19.1	11.8	108.5	109.1	-0.7	94.7	12.4	4,209
2015-16	OKC	C	23	82	21.0	24.0	62.6	58.3	22.9	3.2	18.9	14.5	23.0	11.8	110.3	106.6	3.8	97.7	16.2	3,499
2016-17	OKC	C	24	72	21.3	23.5	59.9	54.9	27.1	7.8	15.6	12.6	18.5	11.7	109.3	108.0	1.3	98.4	15.4	3,149
2017-18	NYK	C	25	71	25.8	23.9	63.0	59.2	21.2	9.1	21.2	14.6	27.9	12.0	106.6	111.5	-4.9	98.0	16.1	3,733
2018-19	NYK/POR	C	26	67	24.5	22.3	59.4	55.6	21.9	12.0	18.8	13.8	24.5	11.8	106.4	112.6	-6.2	100.2	15.2	3,431
2019-20	BOS	C	27	58	17.0	22.5	59.9	57.3	18.6	8.4	20.8	15.8	25.7	11.2	113.8	103.9	9.9	100.4	15.3	2,061
2020-21	POR	C	28	72	24.4	22.4	63.6	60.5	16.9	6.9	21.3	14.8	28.1	9.8	119.7	114.8	4.9	98.8	14.1	3,607
2021-22	BOS	—	29	35	11.8	15.1	58.5	53.6	12.9	2.7	18.2	14.3	21.9	14.7	111.6	103.8	7.8	98.6	10.5	847

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }

See other players

Same team, 2017-18 ティム・ハーダウェイJr.Tim Hardaway Jr. NYK · F-G · 25

Played 57 games / 33.1 min per game

PER 14.3TS% 53.3%USG% 22.9%

Distance 3.77km2.34mi / gameSpeed Off 7.29 / Def 6.47 km/hOff 4.53 / Def 4.02 mph

Played 77 games / 22.4 min per game

PER 22.5TS% 62.8%USG% 22.2%

Distance 2.56km1.59mi / gameSpeed Off 7.32 / Def 6.44 km/hOff 4.55 / Def 4.00 mph

Played 67 games / 30.4 min per game

PER 19.9TS% 61.7%USG% 23.1%

Distance 3.35km2.08mi / gameSpeed Off 6.60 / Def 5.79 km/hOff 4.10 / Def 3.60 mph