UTA #2 ジョー・イングルスJoe Ingles Joe Ingles

82 G

31.5

PPG11.5

RPG4.2

APG4.8

SPG1.1

BPG0.2

FG%46.7

3P%44.0

FT%79.5

GFC203cm/103kg6'8"/226lbAustraliaThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 82 games / 31.5 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 14.4Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 62.3%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 15.6%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 3.62km2.25mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.42 / Def 6.50 km/hOff 4.61 / Def 4.04 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim20Paint4Mid-range43P65FT7

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition13PnR24Iso / Post6Spot up27Cut / Screen17Putback0Other13

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested2Off. free6Def. contested12Def. free81

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"8190–198cm6'3"–6'6"24198–206cm6'6"–6'9"44206cm and up6'9" and up25

Offense

Drive & Kick

Defense

None

Other

Iron Man

Breakdown

Shooting

DScoringTop 61.5%(#241 of 392)

PTS / 100 possessions

D2P finishingTop 52.6%(#203 of 386)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

S3P finishingTop 0.7%(#2 of 296)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

CFT shootingTop 39.7%(#150 of 378)

FT%

On-ball

BPlaymakingTop 19.0%(#74 of 392)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

EHalf-court creationTop 80.7%(#248 of 308)

Frequency

Efficiency

FDrivingTop 93.0%(#291 of 313)

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

EBall securityTop 78.8%(#309 of 392)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

CCuttingTop 26.8%(#80 of 298)

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

DScreeningTop 57.4%(#225 of 392)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

DReboundingTop 59.3%(#231 of 392)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

ARebound conversionTop 4.1%(#16 of 392)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

CBox-outsTop 49.2%(#193 of 392)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

COn-ball defenseTop 37.0%(#145 of 392)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

FRim protectionTop 92.6%(#323 of 349)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

DHustleTop 66.1%(#259 of 392)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2014-15	UTA	G/F	27	79	21.2	F	C	C	D	C	E	F	D	—		E	B
2015-16	UTA	F	28	81	15.3	E	C	B	—	C	E	G	C	—		D	B
2016-17	UTA	F	29	82	24.0	E	D	A	D	C	C	F	D	D	D	D	B			E
2017-18	UTA	F	30	82	31.5	D	D	S	C	B	E	F	E	C	D	D	A	C	C	F	D	D&KIRON
2018-19	UTA	F	31	82	31.3	D	C	B	D	B	D	E	F	E	D	D	B	D	C	E	D	D&KPULLIRON
2019-20	UTA	F/G	32	72	29.7	E	C	B	C	B	C	E	D	C	C	D	A	C	C	G	C	D&KPULLIRON
2020-21	UTA	F/G	33	67	27.9	C	B	S	B	B	B	E	C	C	C	D	A	C	E	G	E	D&KPULLIRON
2021-22	POR	F/G	34	45	24.9	E	B	D	D	B	B	E	B	E	D	E	B	D	D	G	G	PULL
2022-23	MIL	F/G	35	46	22.7	E	—	B	C	C	C	G	D	—	E	E	A	D	C	E	F
2023-24	ORL	F/G	36	68	17.2	F	E	A	C	B	E	F	D	—	C	D	A	D	F	G	D
2024-25	MIN	F/G	37	19	6.0	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2025-26	MIN	F/G	38	27	5.7	No grade — below the minutes cutoff

View

335 / 718(46.7%)Not shown on the chart: Beyond 30 ft: 3 (they are included in the table below)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	142	92	64.8%	63.1%	+1.7
Above the break 3 · Right wing	119	48	40.3%	35.5%	+4.9
Above the break 3 · Left wing	113	47	41.6%	35.6%	+6.0
Above the break 3 · Center	81	35	43.2%	36.0%	+7.2
Right corner 3 · Right	80	38	47.5%	40.4%	+7.1
Left corner 3 · Left	70	36	51.4%	38.4%	+13.1
Paint · Center	59	19	32.2%	38.4%	−6.2
Mid-range · Left wing	14	4	28.6%	39.6%	−11.0
Mid-range · Right	12	6	50.0%	40.9%	+9.1
Mid-range · Left	9	4	44.4%	40.2%	+4.2
Mid-range · Right wing	9	1	11.1%	39.1%	−28.0
Mid-range · Center	5	4	80.0%	42.4%	+37.6
Paint · Left	3	1	33.3%	39.8%	−6.5
Backcourt	1	0	0.0%	1.0%	−1.0
Paint · Right	1	0	0.0%	40.5%	−40.5

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2014-15	UTA	G/F	27	79	32	21.2	1.9	4.5	41.5	0.9	1.9	49.3	0.9	2.6	35.6	0.4	0.5	75.0	0.3	1.9	2.2	2.3	0.9	0.1	1.2	1.6	5.0
2015-16	UTA	F	28	81	2	15.3	1.5	3.6	42.6	0.5	1.0	53.1	1.0	2.6	38.6	0.2	0.2	72.2	0.2	1.6	1.9	1.2	0.7	0.0	0.8	1.2	4.2
2016-17	UTA	F	29	82	26	24.0	2.5	5.5	45.2	1.0	2.1	47.1	1.5	3.4	44.1	0.6	0.8	73.5	0.3	2.9	3.2	2.7	1.2	0.1	1.3	2.0	7.1
2017-18	UTA	F	30	82	81	31.5	4.1	8.8	46.7	1.6	3.1	51.6	2.5	5.7	44.0	0.8	1.0	79.5	0.3	3.9	4.2	4.8	1.1	0.2	1.9	2.2	11.5
2018-19	UTA	F	31	82	82	31.3	4.4	9.8	44.8	2.1	3.9	53.3	2.3	5.9	39.1	1.1	1.5	70.7	0.4	3.6	4.0	5.7	1.2	0.2	2.4	2.2	12.1
2019-20	UTA	F/G	32	72	45	29.7	3.4	7.7	44.5	1.5	2.8	52.5	2.0	4.9	39.9	1.0	1.3	78.7	0.4	3.5	3.9	5.2	0.9	0.2	2.0	2.1	9.8
2020-21	UTA	F/G	33	67	30	27.9	4.1	8.4	48.9	1.4	2.3	59.0	2.7	6.1	45.1	1.1	1.3	84.4	0.4	3.2	3.6	4.7	0.7	0.2	1.7	1.8	12.1
2021-22	POR	F/G	34	45	15	24.9	2.6	6.3	40.4	0.8	1.3	61.7	1.7	5.0	34.7	0.4	0.5	77.3	0.3	2.6	2.9	3.5	0.5	0.1	1.0	1.8	7.2
2022-23	MIL	F/G	35	46	0	22.7	2.3	5.4	43.5	0.5	1.0	55.6	1.8	4.4	40.9	0.4	0.5	85.7	0.3	2.5	2.8	3.3	0.7	0.1	1.2	1.6	6.9
2023-24	ORL	F/G	36	68	0	17.2	1.5	3.3	43.6	0.4	1.0	43.9	1.0	2.4	43.5	0.4	0.5	82.4	0.3	1.8	2.1	3.0	0.6	0.1	1.0	1.3	4.4
2024-25	MIN	F/G	37	19	1	6.0	0.3	1.2	26.1	0.2	0.4	37.5	0.2	0.8	20.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.1	0.5	0.6	1.2	0.1	0.0	0.5	0.6	0.8
2025-26	MIN	F/G	38	27	2	5.7	0.6	1.0	59.3	0.3	0.4	81.8	0.3	0.6	43.8	0.1	0.1	100.0	0.0	0.7	0.7	1.3	0.3	0.1	0.5	0.3	1.5

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2014-15	UTA	G/F	27	Missed the playoffs
2015-16	UTA	F	28	Missed the playoffs
2016-17	UTA	F	29	11	11	30.3	2.3	5.6	40.3	0.9	1.9	47.6	1.4	3.7	36.6	0.5	0.8	66.7	0.2	3.5	3.7	3.3	2.0	0.5	1.5	2.5	6.5
2017-18	UTA	F	30	11	11	34.7	5.2	11.0	47.1	2.0	4.0	50.0	3.2	7.0	45.5	1.0	1.5	64.7	0.5	3.9	4.4	3.4	0.5	0.2	2.4	2.6	14.5
2018-19	UTA	F	31	5	5	30.2	2.4	7.4	32.4	0.8	1.6	50.0	1.6	5.8	27.6	0.0	0.0	—	0.6	4.2	4.8	5.0	2.2	0.0	1.6	2.8	6.4
2019-20	UTA	F/G	32	7	7	33.4	3.1	7.7	40.7	1.1	2.0	57.1	2.0	5.7	35.0	0.9	0.9	100.0	0.1	3.3	3.4	4.7	0.6	0.1	0.6	2.1	9.1
2020-21	UTA	F/G	33	11	6	27.8	3.5	7.2	49.4	1.4	1.9	71.4	2.2	5.3	41.4	0.9	1.2	76.9	0.1	3.0	3.1	3.5	0.6	0.0	0.8	1.7	10.2
2021-22	POR	F/G	34	Missed the playoffs
2022-23	MIL	F/G	35	5	0	17.8	2.4	4.6	52.2	0.4	0.6	66.7	2.0	4.0	50.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.2	1.0	1.2	2.0	0.6	0.2	1.2	1.4	6.8
2023-24	ORL	F/G	36	7	0	9.7	0.6	1.7	33.3	0.3	0.7	40.0	0.3	1.0	28.6	0.1	0.3	50.0	0.3	1.6	1.9	1.7	0.4	0.0	0.0	0.4	1.6
2024-25	MIN	F/G	37	Did not play
2025-26	MIN	F/G	38	3	0	4.7	0.7	1.0	66.7	0.0	0.0	—	0.7	1.0	66.7	0.3	0.7	50.0	0.3	0.3	0.7	0.0	0.7	0.0	0.3	0.0	2.3

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2014-15	UTA	G/F	27	79	21.2	9.7	53.3	51.7	12.6	17.1	5.4	1.3	9.4	15.1	100.0	102.3	-2.2	92.3	7.2	3,229
2015-16	UTA	F	28	81	15.3	10.3	57.2	56.5	12.8	12.5	6.1	1.5	10.9	14.2	99.4	100.3	-0.9	95.2	7.9	2,474
2016-17	UTA	F	29	82	24.1	12.5	60.4	58.9	13.5	16.8	7.0	1.3	12.3	13.1	108.5	104.4	4.0	94.5	9.0	3,881
2017-18	UTA	F	30	82	31.4	14.4	62.3	60.9	15.6	22.2	6.8	1.0	12.5	12.2	107.7	102.4	5.3	97.6	10.7	5,236
2018-19	UTA	F	31	82	31.3	13.4	58.1	56.5	17.0	26.2	6.1	1.3	10.8	12.7	109.2	101.6	7.7	102.1	10.4	5,467
2019-20	UTA	F/G	32	72	29.7	12.6	59.5	57.2	14.8	24.4	6.4	1.3	11.2	12.8	110.8	105.6	5.1	100.3	9.6	4,470
2020-21	UTA	F/G	33	67	27.9	15.9	67.2	65.2	16.2	23.8	6.3	1.4	10.8	11.3	116.7	104.9	11.8	101.1	11.2	3,926
2021-22	POR	F/G	34	45	24.9	10.0	55.1	54.0	12.9	19.5	5.6	1.0	9.9	9.2	111.9	103.7	8.2	99.1	7.7	2,315
2022-23	MIL	F/G	35	46	22.7	10.7	61.6	60.3	12.2	18.1	5.8	1.2	10.2	11.9	114.9	112.4	2.5	104.1	7.6	2,274
2023-24	ORL	F/G	36	68	17.2	10.6	61.2	59.0	11.1	21.7	6.4	1.7	11.1	13.2	116.1	110.3	5.8	98.6	8.1	2,412
2024-25	MIN	F/G	37	19	6.0	2.4	32.6	32.6	11.3	26.1	4.8	1.7	8.0	16.4	108.9	113.1	-4.2	102.0	2.5	248
2025-26	MIN	F/G	38	27	5.7	13.1	73.5	72.2	10.6	26.8	6.0	0.0	11.0	18.4	110.9	116.7	-5.8	110.8	9.6	358

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }

See other players

Same team, 2017-18 ドノバン・ミッチェルDonovan Mitchell UTA · G · 21

Played 79 games / 33.4 min per game

PER 16.7TS% 54.1%USG% 28.3%

Distance 3.77km2.34mi / gameSpeed Off 7.34 / Def 6.23 km/hOff 4.56 / Def 3.87 mph

Played 67 games / 20.5 min per game

PER 12.6TS% 58.1%USG% 13.9%

Distance 2.38km1.48mi / gameSpeed Off 7.29 / Def 6.71 km/hOff 4.53 / Def 4.17 mph

Played 80 games / 27.1 min per game

PER 14.1TS% 59.0%USG% 13.9%

Distance 3.44km2.14mi / gameSpeed Off 7.93 / Def 6.60 km/hOff 4.93 / Def 4.10 mph