UTA ケネディ・チャンドラーKennedy Chandler Kennedy Chandler

11 G

32.3

PPG15.0

RPG3.4

APG6.7

SPG1.0

BPG0.2

FG%44.5

3P%39.5

FT%65.1

183cm/77kg6'0"/170lbUSAThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 11 games / 32.3 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 12.9Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 52.9%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 19.5%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 3.75km2.33mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.61 / Def 6.37 km/hOff 4.73 / Def 3.96 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim38Paint15Mid-range43P27FT17

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition0PnR0Iso / Post0Spot up0Cut / Screen0Putback0Other0

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested8Off. free8Def. contested8Def. free76

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"17190–198cm6'3"–6'6"46198–206cm6'6"–6'9"27206cm and up6'9" and up10

Offense

Slasher Ball Handler

Defense

None

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

DScoringTop 51.6%(#224 of 434)

PTS / 100 possessions

E2P finishingTop 85.7%(#353 of 412)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

—3P finishingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

EFT shootingTop 83.5%(#340 of 407)

FT%

On-ball

BPlaymakingTop 12.4%(#53 of 434)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

—Half-court creationNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Frequency

—

Efficiency

—

BDrivingTop 21.6%(#83 of 384)

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

CBall securityTop 37.3%(#162 of 434)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

—CuttingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

FScreeningTop 95.4%(#414 of 434)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

EReboundingTop 89.4%(#387 of 434)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

BRebound conversionTop 19.8%(#86 of 434)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

GBox-outsTop 99.9%(#433 of 434)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

DOn-ball defenseTop 52.3%(#227 of 434)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

—Rim protectionNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

—

DHustleTop 51.3%(#222 of 434)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2022-23	MEM	—	20	36	7.8	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2023-24	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2024-25	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2025-26	UTA	—	23	11	32.3	D	E	—	E	B	—	B	C	—	F	E	B	G	D	—	D	SLSHHNDL

View

61 / 137(44.5%)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	48	31	64.6%	67.1%	−2.5
Paint · Center	30	9	30.0%	44.0%	−14.0
Above the break 3 · Center	12	6	50.0%	35.2%	+14.8
Above the break 3 · Left wing	10	3	30.0%	35.2%	−5.2
Above the break 3 · Right wing	6	2	33.3%	34.6%	−1.3
Paint · Right	6	2	33.3%	43.6%	−10.3
Left corner 3 · Left	6	2	33.3%	38.7%	−5.4
Paint · Left	5	1	20.0%	42.9%	−22.9
Right corner 3 · Right	4	2	50.0%	38.6%	+11.4
Mid-range · Left	3	1	33.3%	41.6%	−8.3
Mid-range · Center	2	0	0.0%	45.3%	−45.3
Mid-range · Left wing	2	1	50.0%	39.6%	+10.4
Mid-range · Right	2	1	50.0%	43.9%	+6.1
Mid-range · Right wing	1	0	0.0%	40.0%	−40.0

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2022-23	MEM	—	20	36	0	7.8	1.0	2.3	42.2	0.9	1.9	48.5	0.1	0.4	13.3	0.2	0.4	46.2	0.3	0.8	1.1	1.6	0.3	0.1	0.5	0.4	2.2
2023-24	—	—	—	Did not play
2024-25	—	—	—	Did not play
2025-26	UTA	—	23	11	2	32.3	5.5	12.5	44.5	4.2	9.0	46.5	1.4	3.5	39.5	2.5	3.9	65.1	0.5	2.8	3.4	6.7	1.0	0.2	2.1	2.1	15.0

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G
2022-23	MEM	—	20	Did not play
2023-24	—	—	—	Did not play
2024-25	—	—	—	Did not play
2025-26	UTA	—	23	Missed the playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2022-23	MEM	—	20	36	7.8	10.5	44.0	43.4	15.0	27.8	6.4	2.9	10.3	11.0	103.0	108.4	-5.4	103.3	8.5	602
2023-24	—	—	—	Did not play
2024-25	—	—	—	Did not play
2025-26	UTA	—	23	11	32.3	12.9	52.9	50.0	19.5	26.1	4.9	1.5	8.5	9.1	113.3	122.6	-9.3	109.2	8.1	811

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }