CHA #0 マイルズ・ブリッジズMiles Bridges Miles Bridges

80 G

21.2

PPG7.5

RPG4.0

APG1.2

SPG0.7

BPG0.6

FG%46.4

3P%32.5

FT%75.3

GFC201cm/102kg6'7"/225lbUSAThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 80 games / 21.2 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 13.1Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 54.8%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 14.7%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 2.66km1.65mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.58 / Def 6.55 km/hOff 4.71 / Def 4.07 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim49Paint6Mid-range33P33FT10

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition18PnR9Iso / Post8Spot up40Cut / Screen9Putback6Other10

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested12Off. free8Def. contested20Def. free60

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"6190–198cm6'3"–6'6"19198–206cm6'6"–6'9"39206cm and up6'9" and up36

Offense

None

Defense

None

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

DScoringTop 69.7%(#281 of 403)

PTS / 100 possessions

D2P finishingTop 57.0%(#223 of 391)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

D3P finishingTop 67.8%(#215 of 317)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

DFT shootingTop 54.5%(#210 of 385)

FT%

On-ball

DPlaymakingTop 71.6%(#287 of 403)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

DHalf-court creationTop 73.1%(#227 of 312)

Frequency

Efficiency

CDrivingTop 28.1%(#89 of 317)

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

BBall securityTop 16.4%(#66 of 403)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

ACuttingTop 7.2%(#22 of 304)

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

CScreeningTop 39.2%(#158 of 403)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

CReboundingTop 37.5%(#150 of 403)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

ARebound conversionTop 7.4%(#30 of 403)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

CBox-outsTop 41.2%(#166 of 403)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

BOn-ball defenseTop 13.2%(#53 of 403)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

DRim protectionTop 51.0%(#182 of 357)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

FHustleTop 92.3%(#372 of 403)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2018-19	CHA	F	20	80	21.2	D	D	D	D	D	D	C	B	A	C	C	A	C	B	D	F
2019-20	CHA	F	21	65	30.7	C	E	E	C	D	C	C	D	E	E	C	B	D	B	C	E	SLSHC&S
2020-21	CHA	F	22	66	29.3	C	C	B	B	C	C	C	E	B	C	C	A	C	B	B	D	IRON
2021-22	CHA	F	23	80	35.5	B	C	E	C	C	B	A	D	B	C	C	B	C	B	C	E	SLSHPULLIRON
2022-23	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	CHA	F	25	69	37.4	B	D	D	C	C	C	B	C	B	D	C	A	C	B	D	D	SLSHPULL
2024-25	CHA	F	26	64	31.7	B	E	F	B	B	C	B	D	E	D	C	A	C	C	B	D	SLSHPULL
2025-26	CHA	F	27	77	31.0	B	D	E	C	C	D	B	B	B	C	C	C	C	C	C	E	SLSH

View

237 / 511(46.4%)Not shown on the chart: Beyond 30 ft: 8 (they are included in the table below)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	228	146	64.0%	62.9%	+1.1
Above the break 3 · Right wing	43	15	34.9%	35.2%	−0.3
Right corner 3 · Right	43	17	39.5%	37.8%	+1.8
Paint · Center	42	14	33.3%	39.2%	−5.9
Above the break 3 · Left wing	40	13	32.5%	35.2%	−2.7
Left corner 3 · Left	35	13	37.1%	38.6%	−1.5
Above the break 3 · Center	30	7	23.3%	34.2%	−10.8
Mid-range · Right	12	4	33.3%	41.2%	−7.9
Backcourt	8	0	0.0%	3.0%	−3.0
Paint · Right	8	4	50.0%	41.1%	+8.9
Mid-range · Center	7	1	14.3%	41.4%	−27.1
Mid-range · Left wing	5	1	20.0%	40.1%	−20.1
Mid-range · Left	4	1	25.0%	39.6%	−14.6
Mid-range · Right wing	4	1	25.0%	40.5%	−15.5
Paint · Left	2	0	0.0%	39.8%	−39.8

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2018-19	CHA	F	20	80	25	21.2	3.0	6.4	46.4	2.2	3.9	55.3	0.8	2.5	32.5	0.7	1.0	75.3	0.8	3.2	4.0	1.2	0.7	0.6	0.6	1.4	7.5
2019-20	CHA	F	21	65	64	30.7	4.9	11.6	42.4	3.4	7.0	48.6	1.5	4.6	33.0	1.6	2.0	80.9	1.4	4.2	5.6	1.8	0.6	0.7	1.5	2.0	13.0
2020-21	CHA	F	22	66	19	29.3	4.7	9.4	50.3	3.0	5.0	59.3	1.8	4.4	40.0	1.5	1.7	86.7	1.2	4.8	6.0	2.2	0.7	0.8	1.6	2.2	12.7
2021-22	CHA	F	23	80	80	35.5	7.5	15.2	49.1	5.5	9.4	59.0	1.9	5.8	33.1	3.3	4.2	80.2	1.1	5.9	7.0	3.8	0.9	0.8	1.9	2.4	20.2
2022-23	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	CHA	F	25	69	67	37.4	8.1	17.5	46.2	5.8	11.0	52.9	2.3	6.5	34.9	2.5	3.1	82.5	1.0	6.3	7.3	3.3	0.9	0.5	2.0	1.7	21.0
2024-25	CHA	F	26	64	64	31.7	7.3	17.0	43.1	5.1	10.0	51.3	2.2	7.0	31.3	3.5	4.0	87.0	1.1	6.4	7.5	3.9	0.7	0.7	2.1	1.5	20.3
2025-26	CHA	F	27	77	77	31.0	6.2	13.5	46.0	4.3	7.8	55.4	1.9	5.8	33.3	2.7	3.3	82.2	1.0	4.9	5.8	3.2	0.6	0.4	1.4	1.7	17.1

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G
2018-19	CHA	F	20	Missed the playoffs
2019-20	CHA	F	21	Missed the playoffs
2020-21	CHA	F	22	Lost in the play-in
2021-22	CHA	F	23	Lost in the play-in
2022-23	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	CHA	F	25	Missed the playoffs
2024-25	CHA	F	26	Missed the playoffs
2025-26	CHA	F	27	Lost in the play-in

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2018-19	CHA	F	20	80	21.2	13.1	54.8	52.7	14.7	8.1	9.1	3.7	14.8	7.3	107.8	111.5	-3.7	101.3	8.5	3,582
2019-20	CHA	F	21	65	30.7	12.1	52.0	48.9	19.6	9.2	8.8	4.2	13.8	9.3	104.4	114.0	-9.7	97.2	8.2	4,036
2020-21	CHA	F	22	66	29.3	14.6	62.5	59.6	17.0	11.3	10.0	4.1	15.8	11.5	110.4	110.1	0.3	100.8	10.3	4,047
2021-22	CHA	F	23	80	35.5	17.9	59.3	55.4	22.4	15.3	9.4	3.0	15.8	8.3	114.5	112.4	2.1	101.0	12.0	5,975
2022-23	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	CHA	F	25	69	37.4	15.4	55.6	52.7	24.2	14.6	9.9	2.7	17.6	8.3	108.0	120.1	-12.1	98.5	11.1	5,298
2024-25	CHA	F	26	64	31.7	17.6	54.1	49.5	27.3	20.3	11.0	3.3	18.9	8.6	108.2	113.6	-5.5	100.6	13.5	4,239
2025-26	CHA	F	27	77	31.0	15.9	57.0	53.1	22.1	15.4	9.2	3.0	15.5	7.1	118.3	114.8	3.5	98.7	11.4	4,896

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }

See other players

Same team, 2018-19 ケンバ・ウォーカーKemba Walker CHA · G · 28

Played 82 games / 34.9 min per game

PER 21.5TS% 55.8%USG% 30.8%

Distance 4.10km2.55mi / gameSpeed Off 7.55 / Def 5.73 km/hOff 4.69 / Def 3.56 mph

Same team, 2017-18 ドワイト・ハワードDwight Howard CHA · C · 32

Played 81 games / 30.4 min per game

PER 20.5TS% 57.7%USG% 23.8%

Distance 3.30km2.05mi / gameSpeed Off 7.05 / Def 6.00 km/hOff 4.38 / Def 3.73 mph

Played 60 games / 23.6 min per game

PER 13.2TS% 54.7%USG% 13.5%

Distance 2.88km1.79mi / gameSpeed Off 7.10 / Def 6.57 km/hOff 4.41 / Def 4.08 mph

Played 55 games / 18.9 min per game

PER 13.0TS% 53.9%USG% 18.5%

Distance 2.19km1.36mi / gameSpeed Off 6.87 / Def 6.07 km/hOff 4.27 / Def 3.77 mph