UTA #8 ブライス・センサボーBrice Sensabaugh Brice Sensabaugh

32 G

18.3

PPG7.5

RPG3.2

APG1.7

SPG0.4

BPG0.2

FG%39.0

3P%29.6

FT%90.2

GFC196cm/107kg6'5"/235lbUSAThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 32 games / 18.3 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 8.5Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 51.1%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 20.1%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 2.16km1.34mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.21 / Def 6.78 km/hOff 4.48 / Def 4.21 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim11Paint22Mid-range103P42FT15

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition0PnR27Iso / Post6Spot up46Cut / Screen11Putback0Other11

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested4Off. free11Def. contested11Def. free74

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"10190–198cm6'3"–6'6"36198–206cm6'6"–6'9"38206cm and up6'9" and up16

Offense

Slasher

Defense

None

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

DScoringTop 50.6%(#209 of 413)

PTS / 100 possessions

C2P finishingTop 33.1%(#127 of 384)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

E3P finishingTop 87.8%(#296 of 337)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

BFT shootingTop 10.9%(#41 of 375)

FT%

On-ball

CPlaymakingTop 45.3%(#185 of 413)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

CHalf-court creationTop 42.1%(#128 of 304)

Frequency

Efficiency

DDrivingTop 62.2%(#201 of 323)

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

GBall securityTop 98.3%(#405 of 412)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

—CuttingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

DScreeningTop 55.9%(#231 of 413)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

CReboundingTop 39.6%(#161 of 413)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

BRebound conversionTop 18.9%(#78 of 413)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

EBox-outsTop 85.0%(#351 of 413)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

EOn-ball defenseTop 75.7%(#312 of 413)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

—Rim protectionNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

—

EHustleTop 86.7%(#358 of 413)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2023-24	UTA	F	20	32	18.3	D	C	E	B	C	C	D	G	—	D	C	B	E	E	—	E	SLSH
2024-25	UTA	F	21	71	20.2	B	C	A	B	D	C	C	G	F	E	D	C	D	E	E	C
2025-26	UTA	F	22	75	23.5	B	B	C	B	D	C	B	F	G	D	D	D	D	E	F	D	SLSHCHRG

View

85 / 218(39.0%)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Paint · Center	43	22	51.2%	43.4%	+7.8
Above the break 3 · Right wing	34	8	23.5%	36.3%	−12.7
Above the break 3 · Left wing	33	11	33.3%	35.9%	−2.6
Rim	22	13	59.1%	66.3%	−7.2
Left corner 3 · Left	20	7	35.0%	38.6%	−3.6
Above the break 3 · Center	14	3	21.4%	35.7%	−14.3
Right corner 3 · Right	14	5	35.7%	39.4%	−3.7
Mid-range · Right	8	3	37.5%	43.1%	−5.6
Paint · Left	6	2	33.3%	44.7%	−11.4
Paint · Right	6	2	33.3%	43.1%	−9.7
Mid-range · Center	6	3	50.0%	46.5%	+3.5
Mid-range · Left	6	4	66.7%	41.7%	+25.0
Mid-range · Left wing	3	1	33.3%	40.4%	−7.0
Mid-range · Right wing	3	1	33.3%	39.1%	−5.8

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2023-24	UTA	F	20	32	11	18.3	2.7	6.8	39.0	1.6	3.2	49.5	1.1	3.6	29.6	1.2	1.3	90.2	0.5	2.7	3.2	1.7	0.4	0.2	1.5	1.3	7.5
2024-25	UTA	F	21	71	15	20.2	3.9	8.4	45.9	1.7	3.2	52.0	2.2	5.2	42.2	0.9	1.0	89.0	0.6	2.4	3.0	1.5	0.6	0.1	1.5	1.6	10.9
2025-26	UTA	F	22	75	22	23.5	5.3	11.4	46.0	3.1	5.5	55.9	2.2	5.9	36.7	2.2	2.7	82.6	0.7	2.3	3.1	1.9	0.7	0.2	1.7	1.9	14.9

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G
2023-24	UTA	F	20	Missed the playoffs
2024-25	UTA	F	21	Missed the playoffs
2025-26	UTA	F	22	Missed the playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2023-24	UTA	F	20	32	18.3	8.5	51.1	46.8	20.1	13.4	8.8	2.7	15.1	13.9	109.3	123.5	-14.2	101.4	6.5	1,236
2024-25	UTA	F	21	71	20.2	13.3	61.2	59.0	20.8	11.7	6.9	2.8	11.0	12.7	109.9	119.5	-9.6	103.2	8.7	3,084
2025-26	UTA	F	22	75	23.5	14.3	59.0	55.4	24.4	12.4	6.3	3.0	9.7	10.3	111.4	120.8	-9.4	105.0	9.0	3,848

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }