NOP #2 イアン・クラークIan Clark Ian Clark

60 G

16.2

PPG6.7

RPG1.5

APG1.6

SPG0.4

BPG0.1

FG%39.4

3P%32.7

FT%89.2

GFC190cm/79kg6'3"/175lbUSAThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 60 games / 16.2 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 8.2Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 50.2%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 18.5%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 2.03km1.26mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.53 / Def 6.52 km/hOff 4.68 / Def 4.05 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim16Paint16Mid-range113P49FT8

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition21PnR20Iso / Post0Spot up27Cut / Screen18Putback0Other14

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested5Off. free10Def. contested11Def. free74

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"18190–198cm6'3"–6'6"39198–206cm6'6"–6'9"32206cm and up6'9" and up11

Offense

None

Defense

None

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

DScoringTop 56.8%(#229 of 403)

PTS / 100 possessions

C2P finishingTop 42.5%(#166 of 391)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

E3P finishingTop 81.4%(#258 of 317)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

BFT shootingTop 12.2%(#47 of 385)

FT%

On-ball

CPlaymakingTop 40.7%(#164 of 403)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

CHalf-court creationTop 42.6%(#133 of 312)

Frequency

Efficiency

DDrivingTop 65.3%(#207 of 317)

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

DBall securityTop 71.2%(#287 of 403)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

FCuttingTop 95.7%(#291 of 304)

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

DScreeningTop 63.5%(#256 of 403)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

FReboundingTop 93.9%(#378 of 403)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

DRebound conversionTop 55.1%(#222 of 403)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

EBox-outsTop 82.6%(#333 of 403)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

EOn-ball defenseTop 77.9%(#314 of 403)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

FRim protectionTop 96.6%(#345 of 357)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

FHustleTop 93.1%(#375 of 403)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2013-14	UTA	G	22	23	7.5	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2014-15	UTA/DEN	G	23	30	6.4	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2015-16	GSW	G	24	66	8.8	C	C	D	C	C	—	C	D	—		D	C
2016-17	GSW	G	25	77	14.8	C	B	C	D	C	D	D	C	C	D	E	C			—
2017-18	NOP	G	26	74	19.6	D	A	E	D	C	B	C	C	F	D	F	D	D	D	E	D
2018-19	NOP	G	27	60	16.2	D	C	E	B	C	C	D	D	F	D	F	D	E	E	F	F

View

151 / 383(39.4%)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Above the break 3 · Left wing	62	25	40.3%	35.2%	+5.1
Paint · Center	61	27	44.3%	39.2%	+5.1
Rim	55	32	58.2%	62.9%	−4.7
Above the break 3 · Right wing	52	13	25.0%	35.2%	−10.2
Above the break 3 · Center	38	9	23.7%	34.2%	−10.5
Right corner 3 · Right	26	10	38.5%	37.8%	+0.7
Left corner 3 · Left	23	8	34.8%	38.6%	−3.8
Mid-range · Left	15	5	33.3%	39.6%	−6.2
Mid-range · Right	14	8	57.1%	41.2%	+15.9
Mid-range · Center	11	3	27.3%	41.4%	−14.1
Paint · Right	7	2	28.6%	41.1%	−12.5
Mid-range · Left wing	7	3	42.9%	40.1%	+2.7
Mid-range · Right wing	7	3	42.9%	40.5%	+2.3
Paint · Left	5	3	60.0%	39.8%	+20.2

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2013-14	UTA	G	22	23	0	7.5	1.1	2.9	38.8	0.7	1.6	41.7	0.5	1.3	35.5	0.2	0.3	71.4	0.1	0.7	0.8	0.7	0.3	0.1	0.6	1.0	3.0
2014-15	UTA/DEN	G	23	30	0	6.4	0.6	1.8	34.5	0.3	0.8	36.0	0.3	1.0	33.3	0.3	0.3	100.0	0.1	0.4	0.5	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.7	1.9
	UTA			23	0	7.0	0.7	1.9	34.1	0.3	0.8	31.6	0.4	1.1	36.0	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.2	0.4	0.6	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.5	1.9
	DEN			7	0	4.4	0.6	1.6	36.4	0.4	0.9	50.0	0.1	0.7	20.0	0.6	0.6	100.0	0.0	0.4	0.4	0.3	0.4	0.1	0.3	1.1	1.9
2015-16	GSW	G	24	66	1	8.8	1.3	3.1	44.1	0.9	1.8	50.0	0.5	1.3	35.7	0.4	0.5	82.4	0.2	0.8	1.0	1.0	0.3	0.2	0.7	0.9	3.6
2016-17	GSW	G	25	77	0	14.8	2.7	5.6	48.7	1.9	3.5	55.6	0.8	2.1	37.4	0.6	0.8	75.9	0.3	1.3	1.6	1.2	0.5	0.1	0.7	1.0	6.8
2017-18	NOP	G	26	74	2	19.6	3.0	6.7	44.8	2.2	4.1	53.3	0.8	2.6	31.8	0.6	0.8	76.3	0.1	1.6	1.7	1.5	0.4	0.1	0.8	1.6	7.4
2018-19	NOP	G	27	60	6	16.2	2.5	6.4	39.4	1.4	3.0	47.0	1.1	3.4	32.7	0.6	0.6	89.2	0.2	1.3	1.5	1.6	0.4	0.1	1.0	1.6	6.7

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2013-14	UTA	G	22	Missed the playoffs
2014-15	UTA/DEN	G	23	Missed the playoffs
	UTA			23	0	7.0	0.7	1.9	34.1	0.3	0.8	31.6	0.4	1.1	36.0	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.2	0.4	0.6	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.5	1.9
	DEN			7	0	4.4	0.6	1.6	36.4	0.4	0.9	50.0	0.1	0.7	20.0	0.6	0.6	100.0	0.0	0.4	0.4	0.3	0.4	0.1	0.3	1.1	1.9
2015-16	GSW	G	24	16	0	9.6	1.6	3.3	49.1	1.3	2.2	57.1	0.4	1.1	33.3	0.5	0.6	80.0	0.1	0.9	1.1	1.0	0.5	0.0	0.6	1.1	4.1
2016-17	GSW	G	25	16	0	13.7	2.5	4.9	50.6	1.7	2.7	62.8	0.8	2.3	36.1	1.0	1.1	94.1	0.3	1.4	1.6	0.7	0.4	0.0	0.7	1.1	6.8
2017-18	NOP	G	26	9	0	21.1	3.1	7.3	42.4	2.0	4.2	47.4	1.1	3.1	35.7	0.4	0.4	100.0	0.2	0.9	1.1	1.2	0.9	0.2	1.0	2.2	7.8
2018-19	NOP	G	27	Missed the playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2013-14	UTA	G	22	23	7.5	9.2	48.5	47.0	21.2	14.7	5.4	1.7	9.0	14.1	98.8	90.6	8.2	96.5	5.7	339
2014-15	UTA/DEN	G	23	30	6.4	8.8	48.3	43.6	15.2	9.7	4.1	2.0	6.5	11.3	96.4	105.3	-9.0	97.4	4.2	387
2015-16	GSW	G	24	66	8.8	11.5	54.4	51.5	19.3	17.1	5.8	2.3	9.0	13.3	102.2	109.8	-7.6	99.6	7.4	1,205
2016-17	GSW	G	25	77	14.8	13.1	57.5	55.8	19.2	12.2	5.1	2.0	7.8	9.1	105.1	103.6	1.5	100.8	9.2	2,388
2017-18	NOP	G	26	74	19.7	9.4	52.9	51.1	16.8	10.7	4.3	0.7	7.4	8.4	107.1	106.0	1.0	102.1	6.2	3,090
2018-19	NOP	G	27	60	16.2	8.2	50.2	48.0	18.5	13.2	4.2	1.2	7.1	10.6	106.2	109.6	-3.4	106.2	5.2	2,159

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }

See other players

Same team, 2018-19 ジュルー・ホリデーJrue Holiday NOP · G · 28

Played 67 games / 35.9 min per game

PER 19.3TS% 55.5%USG% 25.0%

Distance 4.44km2.76mi / gameSpeed Off 7.93 / Def 6.07 km/hOff 4.93 / Def 3.77 mph

Same team, 2017-18 デマーカス・カズンズDeMarcus Cousins NOP · C · 27

Played 48 games / 36.2 min per game

PER 22.6TS% 58.3%USG% 31.8%

Distance 3.49km2.17mi / gameSpeed Off 6.07 / Def 5.54 km/hOff 3.77 / Def 3.44 mph

Played 79 games / 23.0 min per game

PER 11.9TS% 55.7%USG% 18.7%

Distance 2.91km1.81mi / gameSpeed Off 8.06 / Def 6.34 km/hOff 5.01 / Def 3.94 mph

Played 32 games / 18.3 min per game

PER 8.5TS% 51.1%USG% 20.1%

Distance 2.16km1.34mi / gameSpeed Off 7.21 / Def 6.78 km/hOff 4.48 / Def 4.21 mph