UTA #11 ダンテ・エクサムDante Exum Dante Exum

82 G

22.2

PPG4.8

RPG1.6

APG2.4

SPG0.5

BPG0.2

FG%34.9

3P%31.4

FT%62.5

GFC196cm/97kgThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle
2014-15	UTA	G	19	82	22.2	F	E	E	E	C	E	F	D	C		F	E
2015-16	—	G	—	—	—	Did not play
2016-17	UTA	G	21	66	18.6	D	D	E	C	C	C	D	E	C	D	E	D			D
2017-18	UTA	G	22	14	16.8	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2018-19	UTA	G	23	42	15.8	C	F	E	C	B	C	C	E	—	E	E	C	D	F	—	C
2019-20	UTA/CLE	G	24	35	13.9	E	D	C	D	C	C	B	E	—	E	D	B	E	D	C	D
2020-21	HOU	G	25	6	19.3	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2021-22	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2022-23	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	DAL	G	28	55	19.8	D	D	A	D	C	D	D	C	—	C	D	B	F	D	E	C
2024-25	DAL	G	29	20	18.6	C	D	B	D	B	C	D	C	—	C	F	D	F	D	—	B

View

145 / 416(34.9%)Not shown on the chart: Beyond 30 ft: 2 (they are included in the table below)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Above the break 3 · Right wing	77	25	32.5%	34.3%	−1.8
Above the break 3 · Left wing	64	18	28.1%	34.1%	−6.0
Rim	64	43	67.2%	60.1%	+7.1
Left corner 3 · Left	58	24	41.4%	38.0%	+3.4
Right corner 3 · Right	48	12	25.0%	39.2%	−14.2
Paint · Center	32	6	18.8%	38.1%	−19.3
Mid-range · Right wing	19	5	26.3%	38.7%	−12.4
Above the break 3 · Center	16	4	25.0%	33.8%	−8.8
Mid-range · Right	14	1	7.1%	39.6%	−32.4
Mid-range · Left	9	1	11.1%	39.2%	−28.1
Mid-range · Center	8	3	37.5%	43.1%	−5.6
Mid-range · Left wing	3	1	33.3%	39.2%	−5.9
Paint · Right	2	2	100.0%	39.7%	+60.3
Backcourt	1	0	0.0%	2.6%	−2.6
Paint · Left	1	0	0.0%	41.7%	−41.7

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored. The NBA only publishes shot coordinates from 1996-97 on.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2014-15	UTA	G	19	82	41	22.2	1.8	5.1	34.9	0.8	1.9	40.8	1.0	3.2	31.4	0.2	0.4	62.5	0.3	1.3	1.6	2.4	0.5	0.2	1.4	1.8	4.8
2015-16	—	G	—	Did not play
2016-17	UTA	G	21	66	26	18.6	2.3	5.5	42.7	1.7	3.2	51.9	0.7	2.3	29.5	0.9	1.1	79.5	0.5	1.5	2.0	1.7	0.3	0.2	1.2	2.2	6.2
2017-18	UTA	G	22	14	0	16.8	3.0	6.2	48.3	2.6	4.9	53.6	0.4	1.3	27.8	1.8	2.2	80.6	0.3	1.6	1.9	3.1	0.6	0.2	1.4	1.4	8.1
2018-19	UTA	G	23	42	1	15.8	2.4	5.7	41.9	2.0	4.3	46.4	0.4	1.5	29.0	1.6	2.0	79.1	0.4	1.2	1.6	2.6	0.3	0.1	1.2	1.6	6.9
2019-20	UTA/CLE	G	24	35	1	13.9	1.6	3.4	47.1	1.2	2.2	53.9	0.4	1.2	34.9	0.9	1.2	74.4	0.3	1.6	1.9	1.1	0.4	0.2	0.9	1.1	4.5
	UTA			11	0	7.5	0.9	2.1	43.5	0.7	1.5	47.1	0.2	0.5	33.3	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.3	0.8	1.1	0.6	0.1	0.2	0.9	0.7	2.2
	CLE			24	1	16.8	1.9	4.0	47.9	1.4	2.5	55.9	0.5	1.5	35.1	1.3	1.7	73.2	0.4	1.9	2.3	1.4	0.5	0.3	0.9	1.3	5.6
2020-21	HOU	G	25	6	3	19.3	1.7	4.3	38.5	1.3	2.5	53.3	0.3	1.8	18.2	0.2	0.3	50.0	0.3	2.5	2.8	2.2	0.7	0.3	1.2	1.5	3.8
2021-22	—	—	—	Did not play
2022-23	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	DAL	G	28	55	17	19.8	2.9	5.5	53.3	2.0	3.5	55.7	1.0	2.0	49.1	1.0	1.2	77.9	0.5	2.3	2.7	2.9	0.4	0.1	0.9	1.5	7.8
2024-25	DAL	G	29	20	13	18.6	3.2	6.7	47.8	2.1	4.1	50.6	1.2	2.7	43.4	1.2	1.6	74.2	0.2	1.5	1.7	2.8	0.6	0.2	1.1	1.7	8.7

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2014-15	UTA	G	19	Missed the playoffs
2015-16	—	G	—	Did not play
2016-17	UTA	G	21	7	0	12.0	1.6	3.9	40.7	1.0	2.1	46.7	0.6	1.7	33.3	0.9	0.9	100.0	0.3	0.6	0.9	1.3	0.7	0.0	0.4	1.4	4.6
2017-18	UTA	G	22	10	0	11.4	2.0	4.1	48.8	1.8	3.4	52.9	0.2	0.7	28.6	0.9	1.2	75.0	0.4	1.0	1.4	1.0	0.1	0.1	1.5	1.5	5.1
2018-19	UTA	G	23	Did not play
2019-20	UTA/CLE	G	24	Did not play
	UTA			11	0	7.5	0.9	2.1	43.5	0.7	1.5	47.1	0.2	0.5	33.3	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.3	0.8	1.1	0.6	0.1	0.2	0.9	0.7	2.2
	CLE			24	1	16.8	1.9	4.0	47.9	1.4	2.5	55.9	0.5	1.5	35.1	1.3	1.7	73.2	0.4	1.9	2.3	1.4	0.5	0.3	0.9	1.3	5.6
2020-21	HOU	G	25	Missed the playoffs
2021-22	—	—	—	Did not play
2022-23	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	DAL	G	28	21	0	6.9	0.8	2.1	36.4	0.4	1.1	37.5	0.3	1.0	35.0	0.2	0.3	66.7	0.1	0.7	0.8	0.6	0.1	0.0	0.2	0.4	2.0
2024-25	DAL	G	29	Lost in the play-in

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2014-15	UTA	G	19	82	22.2	5.7	45.7	44.8	13.7	16.9	3.7	1.6	5.7	15.8	102.0	99.3	2.7	91.0	3.7	3,446
2015-16	—	G	—	Did not play
2016-17	UTA	G	21	66	18.6	8.6	52.1	48.8	17.6	14.4	5.5	2.6	8.2	13.7	102.7	102.1	0.6	94.5	5.4	2,411
2017-18	UTA	G	22	14	16.8	16.7	56.6	51.1	22.3	27.0	5.3	1.8	8.3	12.1	106.5	98.4	8.1	101.7	11.7	493
2018-19	UTA	G	23	42	15.8	11.2	51.6	45.6	20.7	25.1	5.1	2.4	7.7	11.7	103.8	100.6	3.2	103.1	8.2	1,427
2019-20	UTA/CLE	G	24	35	13.9	10.3	57.6	53.4	14.5	12.4	6.6	2.4	10.9	14.8	98.2	107.1	-8.8	101.1	7.5	1,014
2020-21	HOU	G	25	6	19.4	5.9	42.8	42.3	11.9	15.5	6.9	1.5	12.9	14.9	99.6	96.0	3.6	102.7	5.8	247
2021-22	—	—	—	Did not play
2022-23	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	DAL	G	28	55	19.8	13.7	64.5	62.1	14.8	18.1	6.7	2.3	10.8	9.1	120.7	110.5	10.3	101.9	9.3	2,310
2024-25	DAL	G	29	20	18.6	13.6	58.9	56.3	19.3	22.0	4.2	1.0	7.4	9.7	109.3	115.2	-6.0	101.4	8.3	786

/* 押しても何も起きないタブの行（タブ・プルダウン・描き方）は出さない */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }