CLE #1 ダンテ・エクサムDante Exum Dante Exum

35 G

13.9

PPG4.5

RPG1.9

APG1.1

SPG0.4

BPG0.2

FG%47.1

3P%34.9

FT%74.4

GFC196cm/97kg6'5"/214lbAustraliaThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 35 games / 13.9 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 10.3Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 57.6%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 14.5%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 1.74km1.08mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.44 / Def 6.58 km/hOff 4.62 / Def 4.09 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim40Paint8Mid-range43P28FT20

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition26PnR43Iso / Post0Spot up31Cut / Screen0Putback0Other0

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested4Off. free15Def. contested9Def. free73

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"18190–198cm6'3"–6'6"41198–206cm6'6"–6'9"31206cm and up6'9" and up11

Offense

None

Defense

None

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

EScoringTop 77.8%(#315 of 405)

PTS / 100 possessions

D2P finishingTop 53.3%(#208 of 390)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

C3P finishingTop 46.3%(#150 of 324)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

DFT shootingTop 60.2%(#227 of 377)

FT%

On-ball

CPlaymakingTop 44.3%(#179 of 405)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

CHalf-court creationTop 30.6%(#92 of 301)

Frequency

Efficiency

BDrivingTop 19.7%(#62 of 315)

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

EBall securityTop 86.4%(#350 of 405)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

—CuttingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

EScreeningTop 89.1%(#361 of 405)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

DReboundingTop 65.6%(#263 of 405)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

BRebound conversionTop 24.2%(#98 of 405)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

EBox-outsTop 91.4%(#370 of 405)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

DOn-ball defenseTop 64.2%(#260 of 405)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

CRim protectionTop 39.9%(#144 of 361)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

DHustleTop 70.9%(#287 of 405)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2014-15	UTA	G	19	82	22.2	F	E	E	E	C	E	F	D	C		F	E
2015-16	—	G	—	—	—	Did not play
2016-17	UTA	G	21	66	18.6	D	D	E	C	C	C	D	E	C	D	E	D			D
2017-18	UTA	G	22	14	16.8	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2018-19	UTA	G	23	42	15.8	C	F	E	C	B	C	C	E	—	E	E	C	D	F	—	C	FDD&KHNDL
2019-20	UTA/CLE	G	24	35	13.9	E	D	C	D	C	C	B	E	—	E	D	B	E	D	C	D
2020-21	HOU	G	25	6	19.3	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2021-22	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2022-23	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	DAL	G	28	55	19.8	D	D	A	D	C	D	D	C	—	C	D	B	F	D	E	C	D&KHNDL
2024-25	DAL	G	29	20	18.6	C	D	B	D	B	C	D	C	—	C	F	D	F	D	—	B	D&KHNDL

View

56 / 119(47.1%)Not shown on the chart: Beyond 30 ft: 1 (they are included in the table below)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	52	32	61.5%	63.5%	−2.0
Paint · Center	20	5	25.0%	38.5%	−13.5
Above the break 3 · Right wing	15	7	46.7%	35.0%	+11.6
Above the break 3 · Left wing	10	3	30.0%	35.7%	−5.7
Left corner 3 · Left	8	2	25.0%	39.7%	−14.7
Right corner 3 · Right	5	1	20.0%	38.0%	−18.0
Above the break 3 · Center	4	2	50.0%	34.6%	+15.4
Mid-range · Right	2	2	100.0%	40.1%	+59.9
Backcourt	1	0	0.0%	1.7%	−1.7
Paint · Right	1	1	100.0%	39.4%	+60.6
Mid-range · Left	1	1	100.0%	40.5%	+59.5

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2014-15	UTA	G	19	82	41	22.2	1.8	5.1	34.9	0.8	1.9	40.8	1.0	3.2	31.4	0.2	0.4	62.5	0.3	1.3	1.6	2.4	0.5	0.2	1.4	1.8	4.8
2015-16	—	G	—	Did not play
2016-17	UTA	G	21	66	26	18.6	2.3	5.5	42.7	1.7	3.2	51.9	0.7	2.3	29.5	0.9	1.1	79.5	0.5	1.5	2.0	1.7	0.3	0.2	1.2	2.2	6.2
2017-18	UTA	G	22	14	0	16.8	3.0	6.2	48.3	2.6	4.9	53.6	0.4	1.3	27.8	1.8	2.2	80.6	0.3	1.6	1.9	3.1	0.6	0.2	1.4	1.4	8.1
2018-19	UTA	G	23	42	1	15.8	2.4	5.7	41.9	2.0	4.3	46.4	0.4	1.5	29.0	1.6	2.0	79.1	0.4	1.2	1.6	2.6	0.3	0.1	1.2	1.6	6.9
2019-20	UTA/CLE	G	24	35	1	13.9	1.6	3.4	47.1	1.2	2.2	53.9	0.4	1.2	34.9	0.9	1.2	74.4	0.3	1.6	1.9	1.1	0.4	0.2	0.9	1.1	4.5
	UTA			11	0	7.5	0.9	2.1	43.5	0.7	1.5	47.1	0.2	0.5	33.3	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.3	0.8	1.1	0.6	0.1	0.2	0.9	0.7	2.2
	CLE			24	1	16.8	1.9	4.0	47.9	1.4	2.5	55.9	0.5	1.5	35.1	1.3	1.7	73.2	0.4	1.9	2.3	1.4	0.5	0.3	0.9	1.3	5.6
2020-21	HOU	G	25	6	3	19.3	1.7	4.3	38.5	1.3	2.5	53.3	0.3	1.8	18.2	0.2	0.3	50.0	0.3	2.5	2.8	2.2	0.7	0.3	1.2	1.5	3.8
2021-22	—	—	—	Did not play
2022-23	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	DAL	G	28	55	17	19.8	2.9	5.5	53.3	2.0	3.5	55.7	1.0	2.0	49.1	1.0	1.2	77.9	0.5	2.3	2.7	2.9	0.4	0.1	0.9	1.5	7.8
2024-25	DAL	G	29	20	13	18.6	3.2	6.7	47.8	2.1	4.1	50.6	1.2	2.7	43.4	1.2	1.6	74.2	0.2	1.5	1.7	2.8	0.6	0.2	1.1	1.7	8.7

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2014-15	UTA	G	19	Missed the playoffs
2015-16	—	G	—	Did not play
2016-17	UTA	G	21	7	0	12.0	1.6	3.9	40.7	1.0	2.1	46.7	0.6	1.7	33.3	0.9	0.9	100.0	0.3	0.6	0.9	1.3	0.7	0.0	0.4	1.4	4.6
2017-18	UTA	G	22	10	0	11.4	2.0	4.1	48.8	1.8	3.4	52.9	0.2	0.7	28.6	0.9	1.2	75.0	0.4	1.0	1.4	1.0	0.1	0.1	1.5	1.5	5.1
2018-19	UTA	G	23	Did not play
2019-20	UTA/CLE	G	24	Did not play
	UTA			11	0	7.5	0.9	2.1	43.5	0.7	1.5	47.1	0.2	0.5	33.3	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.3	0.8	1.1	0.6	0.1	0.2	0.9	0.7	2.2
	CLE			24	1	16.8	1.9	4.0	47.9	1.4	2.5	55.9	0.5	1.5	35.1	1.3	1.7	73.2	0.4	1.9	2.3	1.4	0.5	0.3	0.9	1.3	5.6
2020-21	HOU	G	25	Missed the playoffs
2021-22	—	—	—	Did not play
2022-23	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	DAL	G	28	21	0	6.9	0.8	2.1	36.4	0.4	1.1	37.5	0.3	1.0	35.0	0.2	0.3	66.7	0.1	0.7	0.8	0.6	0.1	0.0	0.2	0.4	2.0
2024-25	DAL	G	29	Lost in the play-in

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2014-15	UTA	G	19	82	22.2	5.7	45.7	44.8	13.7	16.9	3.7	1.6	5.7	15.8	102.0	99.3	2.7	91.0	3.7	3,446
2015-16	—	G	—	Did not play
2016-17	UTA	G	21	66	18.6	8.6	52.1	48.8	17.6	14.4	5.5	2.6	8.2	13.7	102.7	102.1	0.6	94.5	5.4	2,411
2017-18	UTA	G	22	14	16.8	16.7	56.6	51.1	22.3	27.0	5.3	1.8	8.3	12.1	106.5	98.4	8.1	101.7	11.7	493
2018-19	UTA	G	23	42	15.8	11.2	51.6	45.6	20.7	25.1	5.1	2.4	7.7	11.7	103.8	100.6	3.2	103.1	8.2	1,427
2019-20	UTA/CLE	G	24	35	13.9	10.3	57.6	53.4	14.5	12.4	6.6	2.4	10.9	14.8	98.2	107.1	-8.8	101.1	7.5	1,014
2020-21	HOU	G	25	6	19.4	5.9	42.8	42.3	11.9	15.5	6.9	1.5	12.9	14.9	99.6	96.0	3.6	102.7	5.8	247
2021-22	—	—	—	Did not play
2022-23	—	—	—	Did not play
2023-24	DAL	G	28	55	19.8	13.7	64.5	62.1	14.8	18.1	6.7	2.3	10.8	9.1	120.7	110.5	10.3	101.9	9.3	2,310
2024-25	DAL	G	29	20	18.6	13.6	58.9	56.3	19.3	22.0	4.2	1.0	7.4	9.7	109.3	115.2	-6.0	101.4	8.3	786

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }

See other players

Same team, 2019-20 コリン・セクストンCollin Sexton CLE · G · 21

Played 65 games / 33.0 min per game

PER 16.2TS% 56.0%USG% 26.4%

Distance 3.89km2.42mi / gameSpeed Off 7.21 / Def 6.04 km/hOff 4.48 / Def 3.75 mph

Same team, 2018-19 ジェディ・オスマンCedi Osman CLE · F · 23

Played 76 games / 32.2 min per game

PER 11.5TS% 53.6%USG% 18.2%

Distance 3.75km2.33mi / gameSpeed Off 7.03 / Def 6.21 km/hOff 4.37 / Def 3.86 mph

Played 36 games / 15.5 min per game

PER 8.4TS% 50.9%USG% 14.6%

Distance 1.82km1.13mi / gameSpeed Off 7.76 / Def 5.97 km/hOff 4.82 / Def 3.71 mph

Played 47 games / 16.0 min per game

PER 10.8TS% 55.8%USG% 17.5%

Distance 2.01km1.25mi / gameSpeed Off 7.47 / Def 6.58 km/hOff 4.64 / Def 4.09 mph