UTA #21 ハッサン・ホワイトサイドHassan Whiteside Hassan Whiteside

65 G

17.9

PPG8.2

RPG7.6

APG0.4

SPG0.3

BPG1.6

FG%65.2

3P%—

FT%62.3

GFC213cm/120kg7'0"/265lbUSAThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 65 games / 17.9 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 23.1Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 66.2%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 16.4%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 2.03km1.26mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 6.55 / Def 6.15 km/hOff 4.07 / Def 3.82 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim63Paint17Mid-range13P0FT20

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition6PnR21Iso / Post10Spot up3Cut / Screen20Putback31Other10

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested27Off. free6Def. contested20Def. free47

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"5190–198cm6'3"–6'6"14198–206cm6'6"–6'9"25206cm and up6'9" and up57

Offense

None

Defense

None

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

CScoringTop 36.4%(#155 of 426)

PTS / 100 possessions

A2P finishingTop 6.7%(#27 of 402)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

—3P finishingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

FFT shootingTop 94.9%(#373 of 393)

FT%

On-ball

GPlaymakingTop 99.1%(#422 of 426)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

—Half-court creationNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Frequency

—

Efficiency

—

—DrivingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

—

FBall securityTop 96.2%(#410 of 426)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

ACuttingTop 7.8%(#24 of 309)

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

AScreeningTop 2.6%(#11 of 426)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

SReboundingTop 0.8%(#3 of 426)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

CRebound conversionTop 37.8%(#161 of 426)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

BBox-outsTop 14.1%(#60 of 426)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

GOn-ball defenseTop 98.6%(#420 of 426)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

ARim protectionTop 4.2%(#16 of 379)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

BHustleTop 14.0%(#59 of 426)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags	Awards
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags	Awards
2010-11	SAC	C	21	1	2.0	No grade — below the minutes cutoff																	—
2011-12	SAC	C	22	18	6.1	No grade — below the minutes cutoff																	—
2012-13	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play																	—
2013-14	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play																	—
2014-15	MIA	C	25	48	23.8	B	S	—	F	G	—	—	D	B		S	B						—
2015-16	MIA	C	26	73	29.1	B	S	—	E	G	D	—	G	S		S	A						DEF2
2016-17	MIA	C	27	77	32.6	B	B	—	F	F	D	D	G	A	B	S	A			A			—
2017-18	MIA	C	28	54	25.3	B	C	—	E	E	E	—	F	B	B	S	A	B	G	A	E	POSTID	—
2018-19	MIA	C	29	72	23.3	B	B	—	G	F	F	—	E	C	B	S	A	C	D	S	F	ID	—
2019-20	POR	C	30	67	30.0	B	A	—	E	F	G	—	E	A	A	S	B	C	G	S	E	ID	—
2020-21	SAC	C	31	36	15.2	B	B	—	G	E	—	—	E	D	B	A	C	A	G	B	C	POST	—
2021-22	UTA	C	32	65	17.9	C	A	—	F	G	—	—	F	A	A	S	C	B	G	A	B		—

View

215 / 330(65.2%)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	215	169	78.6%	65.3%	+13.3
Paint · Center	95	42	44.2%	42.0%	+2.2
Paint · Right	5	1	20.0%	42.7%	−22.7
Mid-range · Right	5	1	20.0%	41.7%	−21.7
Paint · Left	3	1	33.3%	43.2%	−9.9
Mid-range · Left	3	1	33.3%	40.3%	−7.0
Mid-range · Right wing	2	0	0.0%	39.0%	−39.0
Mid-range · Center	1	0	0.0%	44.1%	−44.1
Mid-range · Left wing	1	0	0.0%	41.1%	−41.1

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS	Awards
2010-11	SAC	C	21	1	0	2.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	—
2011-12	SAC	C	22	18	0	6.1	0.7	1.5	44.4	0.7	1.5	44.4	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.7	41.7	0.9	1.3	2.2	0.0	0.2	0.8	0.3	0.7	1.6	—
2012-13	—	—	—	Did not play																								—
2013-14	—	—	—	Did not play																								—
2014-15	MIA	C	25	48	32	23.8	5.1	8.1	62.8	5.1	8.1	62.8	0.0	0.0	—	1.6	3.3	50.0	3.0	7.0	10.0	0.1	0.6	2.6	1.2	2.7	11.8	—
2015-16	MIA	C	26	73	43	29.1	5.7	9.3	60.6	5.7	9.3	60.6	0.0	0.0	—	2.9	4.5	65.0	3.3	8.6	11.8	0.4	0.6	3.7	1.9	2.8	14.2	DEF2
2016-17	MIA	C	27	77	77	32.6	7.0	12.6	55.7	7.0	12.6	55.7	0.0	0.0	—	2.9	4.6	62.8	3.8	10.3	14.1	0.7	0.7	2.1	2.0	2.9	17.0	—
2017-18	MIA	C	28	54	54	25.3	5.8	10.7	54.0	5.7	10.7	53.8	0.0	0.0	100.0	2.4	3.4	70.3	3.2	8.2	11.4	1.0	0.7	1.7	1.7	2.4	14.0	—
2018-19	MIA	C	29	72	53	23.3	5.4	9.4	57.1	5.4	9.2	58.1	0.0	0.2	12.5	1.5	3.4	44.9	3.6	7.8	11.3	0.8	0.6	1.9	1.3	2.7	12.3	—
2019-20	POR	C	30	67	61	30.0	6.5	10.5	62.1	6.4	10.4	62.2	0.1	0.1	57.1	2.4	3.6	68.6	3.9	9.7	13.5	1.2	0.4	2.9	1.8	2.9	15.5	—
2020-21	SAC	C	31	36	4	15.2	3.5	6.2	56.3	3.5	6.2	56.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.1	2.2	51.9	1.7	4.3	6.0	0.6	0.3	1.3	1.1	2.0	8.1	—
2021-22	UTA	C	32	65	8	17.9	3.3	5.1	65.2	3.3	5.1	65.2	0.0	0.0	—	1.6	2.6	62.3	2.6	5.0	7.6	0.4	0.3	1.6	0.8	2.8	8.2	—

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS	Awards
2010-11	SAC	C	21	Missed the playoffs																								—
2011-12	SAC	C	22	Missed the playoffs																								—
2012-13	—	—	—	Did not play																								—
2013-14	—	—	—	Did not play																								—
2014-15	MIA	C	25	Missed the playoffs																								—
2015-16	MIA	C	26	10	10	29.1	4.7	6.9	68.1	4.7	6.9	68.1	0.0	0.0	—	2.6	4.4	59.1	2.6	8.3	10.9	0.3	0.8	2.8	1.3	3.4	12.0	—
2016-17	MIA	C	27	Missed the playoffs																								—
2017-18	MIA	C	28	5	5	15.4	1.8	4.0	45.0	1.8	4.0	45.0	0.0	0.0	—	1.6	2.6	61.5	2.0	4.0	6.0	0.2	0.0	1.2	2.4	3.2	5.2	—
2018-19	MIA	C	29	Missed the playoffs																								—
2019-20	POR	C	30	5	3	21.2	2.6	4.8	54.2	2.4	4.6	52.2	0.2	0.2	100.0	1.4	2.8	50.0	1.4	5.6	7.0	0.4	0.2	2.0	1.2	3.4	6.8	—
2020-21	SAC	C	31	Missed the playoffs																								—
2021-22	UTA	C	32	6	0	10.8	0.8	2.0	41.7	0.8	2.0	41.7	0.0	0.0	—	0.2	0.7	25.0	1.3	3.8	5.2	0.0	0.3	1.3	0.0	1.5	1.8	—

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS	Awards
2010-11	SAC	C	21	1	1.7	-17.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	133.3	-133.3	82.6	-200.0	3	—
2011-12	SAC	C	22	18	6.0	16.2	44.9	44.4	15.0	0.0	16.1	14.4	17.6	13.2	100.0	93.8	6.2	98.1	9.1	219	—
2012-13	—	—	—	Did not play																	—
2013-14	—	—	—	Did not play																	—
2014-15	MIA	C	25	48	23.8	26.4	61.9	62.8	20.2	0.9	21.6	13.4	29.3	11.2	104.7	106.8	-2.1	93.1	17.3	2,210	—
2015-16	MIA	C	26	73	29.1	25.9	62.9	60.6	20.1	2.2	20.2	11.6	28.2	13.9	105.5	103.5	1.9	94.0	17.2	4,164	DEF2
2016-17	MIA	C	27	77	32.6	22.7	57.9	55.7	22.3	3.7	21.4	11.5	31.3	11.6	108.7	106.6	2.0	95.6	16.3	5,002	—
2017-18	MIA	C	28	54	25.3	24.2	57.3	54.2	23.5	6.8	21.8	12.1	31.7	11.5	102.1	105.0	-2.8	98.2	17.6	2,792	—
2018-19	MIA	C	29	72	23.3	23.5	56.4	57.2	21.5	5.4	22.2	13.9	30.5	10.4	107.0	106.2	0.7	99.3	16.2	3,462	—
2019-20	POR	C	30	67	30.0	25.1	64.4	62.4	19.2	5.8	21.1	12.3	29.4	12.0	114.8	112.0	2.7	101.1	15.9	4,228	—
2020-21	SAC	C	31	36	15.2	19.3	56.6	56.3	22.7	5.8	19.0	10.9	26.9	12.5	106.3	114.5	-8.1	102.9	12.3	1,166	—
2021-22	UTA	C	32	65	17.9	23.1	66.2	65.2	16.4	3.1	20.9	14.2	27.5	11.0	119.2	109.0	10.1	99.7	13.2	2,408	—

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }

See other players

Same team, 2021-22 ドノバン・ミッチェルDonovan Mitchell UTA · G · 25

Played 67 games / 33.8 min per game

PER 21.5TS% 57.2%USG% 32.2%

Distance 3.64km2.26mi / gameSpeed Off 6.66 / Def 5.42 km/hOff 4.14 / Def 3.37 mph

Same team, 2020-21 ボヤン・ボグダノビッチBojan Bogdanovic UTA · F · 31

Played 72 games / 30.8 min per game

PER 14.0TS% 58.8%USG% 22.5%

Distance 3.64km2.26mi / gameSpeed Off 7.27 / Def 6.15 km/hOff 4.52 / Def 3.82 mph

Played 74 games / 15.8 min per game

PER 22.7TS% 65.1%USG% 21.4%

Distance 1.79km1.11mi / gameSpeed Off 6.97 / Def 5.94 km/hOff 4.33 / Def 3.69 mph

Played 61 games / 12.0 min per game

PER 17.8TS% 64.4%USG% 12.6%

Distance 1.40km0.87mi / gameSpeed Off 7.23 / Def 6.81 km/hOff 4.49 / Def 4.23 mph