SAC サクラメント・キングスSacramento Kings 2010-11

Record: 24W58L
Conference: West 14
Playoffs: Missed the playoffs
League: 25

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2010-11 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

141211109923

Points

131412822

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#15	デマーカス・カズンズDeMarcus Cousins	C	20	81	62	28.5	5.3	12.4	43.0	5.3	12.2	43.5	0.0	0.2	16.7	3.4	5.0	68.7	2.7	6.0	8.6	2.5	1.0	0.8	3.3	4.1	14.1
#10	サミュエル・ダレンバートSamuel Dalembert	C	30	80	46	24.2	3.4	7.1	47.3	3.4	7.1	47.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.4	1.9	73.0	2.7	5.6	8.2	0.8	0.5	1.5	1.7	2.8	8.1
#19	ベイノ・ウードリックBeno Udrih	G	28	79	64	34.6	5.2	10.4	50.0	4.4	8.1	54.0	0.8	2.3	35.7	2.5	2.9	86.4	0.5	2.8	3.4	4.9	1.2	0.1	1.8	2.3	13.7
#34	ジェイソン・トンプソンJason Thompson	F	24	75	39	23.3	3.6	7.1	50.7	3.6	7.1	51.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.6	2.7	60.5	1.9	4.1	6.1	1.2	0.4	0.6	1.3	2.8	8.8
#18	オムリ・キャスピーOmri Casspi	F	22	71	27	24.0	3.2	7.7	41.2	1.9	4.2	44.5	1.3	3.5	37.2	1.0	1.4	67.3	1.0	3.3	4.3	1.0	0.8	0.2	1.0	1.6	8.6
#20	ドンテ・グリーンDonte Greene	F	22	69	21	16.3	2.3	5.6	40.4	1.6	3.4	47.8	0.7	2.2	29.2	0.6	0.9	66.2	0.7	1.4	2.1	0.7	0.5	0.3	0.9	1.3	5.8
#5	プー・ジェターPooh Jeter	G	27	62	1	13.8	1.7	4.2	40.9	1.6	3.7	43.7	0.1	0.5	20.0	0.6	0.7	90.2	0.1	1.0	1.1	2.6	0.5	0.0	0.8	0.9	4.1
#41	ダーネル・ジャクソンDarnell Jackson	F	25	59	2	8.2	1.3	2.7	48.7	1.3	2.5	50.3	0.1	0.2	27.3	0.5	0.8	61.2	0.8	0.8	1.6	0.2	0.2	0.1	0.4	1.0	3.2
#32	フランシスコ・ガルシアFrancisco Garcia	F/G	29	58	34	23.9	3.6	8.2	43.6	2.2	4.3	50.2	1.4	3.9	36.2	1.1	1.3	85.5	0.4	1.9	2.3	1.2	0.9	0.8	0.8	2.2	9.7
#13	タイリーク・エバンスTyreke Evans	G	21	57	53	37.0	6.7	16.4	40.9	5.9	13.8	43.2	0.8	2.6	29.1	3.6	4.7	77.1	0.8	4.0	4.8	5.6	1.5	0.5	3.2	2.5	17.8
#24	カール・ランドリーCarl Landry	F	27	53	16	26.5	4.5	9.1	49.2	4.5	9.1	49.5	0.0	0.1	0.0	2.9	4.1	72.1	2.4	2.4	4.8	0.9	0.6	0.4	1.5	2.4	11.9
#9	ルーサー・ヘッドLuther Head	—	28	36	14	16.3	1.9	4.6	41.5	1.2	2.8	43.0	0.7	1.8	39.1	1.1	1.4	78.0	0.4	1.2	1.7	1.9	0.3	0.3	0.9	1.2	5.6
#23	マーカス・ソーントンMarcus Thornton	G	23	27	23	38.1	7.9	17.5	45.0	5.9	12.1	49.1	2.0	5.4	36.1	3.5	4.4	80.5	1.3	3.4	4.7	3.4	1.7	0.2	2.1	2.2	21.3
#3	ジャーメイン・テイラーJermaine Taylor	—	24	26	8	15.6	3.0	6.3	47.6	2.5	4.8	53.2	0.5	1.5	30.0	0.6	0.8	72.7	1.0	1.1	2.0	1.2	0.5	0.1	1.5	1.3	7.1
#3	アントワン・ライトAntoine Wright	—	26	7	0	4.4	0.1	1.1	12.5	0.1	0.6	25.0	0.0	0.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.1	0.4	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.4	0.3
#33	ハッサン・ホワイトサイドHassan Whiteside	C	21	1	0	2.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0

Points per game: 99.4 #15
Points allowed per game: 104.7 #25
Offensive rating: 102.9 #25
Defensive rating: 108.4 #20
Net rating: -5.5 #25
eFG%: 48.0% #26
Turnover rate: 16.7% #28
Pace: 95.8 #5
Rebounds per game: 43.9 #4
Assists per game: 20.4 #23
Steals per game: 7.4 #12
Blocks per game: 4.8 #15

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: −3.4All-time 765/892
Defense: −2.1All-time 675/892
Diff: −5.5All-time 756/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off26/30E

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def26/30E

Off28/30F

BallKeep it / Take it

Def13/30C

Off2/30A

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def14/30C

Off22/30D

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def17/30D

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	48.0%	26/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	51.3%	26/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	16.7%	28/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	15.2%	13/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	33.4%	2/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	29.8%	14/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	28.4%	22/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	30.5%	17/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionPlayoff lineLost above the line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	SAC	22	60	.268	14	—	28	27	29	29	13	21	20	20	20
2024-25	SAC	40	42	.488	9	Lost in the play-in	10	19	16	15	5	16	13	23	24
2023-24	SAC	46	36	.561	9	Lost in the play-in	9	17	17	14	12	12	7	12	28
2022-23	SAC	48	34	.585	3	Lost in round 1	1	25	8	2	9	20	3	20	29
2021-22	SAC	30	52	.366	12	—	16	29	25	22	17	26	20	18	18
2020-21	SAC	31	41	.431	12	—	11	28	24	9	11	30	12	16	13
2019-20	SAC	31	41	.431	12	—	22	16	21	10	12	27	19	14	25
2018-19	SAC	39	43	.476	9	—	9	26	19	16	7	14	13	6	24
2017-18	SAC	27	55	.329	12	—	30	14	28	27	9	28	24	11	25
2016-17	SAC	32	50	.390	12	—	24	18	25	13	21	28	15	17	25
2015-16	SAC	33	49	.402	10	—	3	30	21	10	28	11	3	5	20
2014-15	SAC	29	53	.354	13	—	14	27	25	20	27	9	26	25	27
2013-14	SAC	28	54	.341	13	—	17	24	22	23	22	9	30	21	27
2012-13	SAC	28	54	.341	13	—	10	30	27	16	13	25	25	11	27
2011-12	SAC	22	44	.333	14	—	6	30	27	27	13	10	26	5	17
2010-11	SAC	24	58	.293	14	—	14	24	25	26	28	4	23	12	15
2009-10	SAC	25	57	.305	14	—	18	25	25	22	23	10	20	21	23
2008-09	SAC	17	65	.207	15	—	12	29	29	22	26	29	27	23	24
2007-08	SAC	38	44	.463	11	—	8	24	20	11	30	27	29	7	24
2006-07	SAC	33	49	.402	11	—	8	24	19	18	10	30	22	3	28
2005-06	SAC	44	38	.537	8	Lost in round 1	10	17	12	14	19	18	5	8	26
2004-05	SAC	50	32	.610	6	Lost in round 1	2	26	9	4	1	11	1	7	24
2003-04	SAC	55	27	.671	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	24	5	1	6	21	1	7	25
2002-03	SAC	59	23	.720	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	3	16	2	2	12	3	3	2	10
2001-02	SAC	61	21	.744	1	Lost in the conf finals	2	19	1	6	8	2	4	3	21
2000-01	SAC	55	27	.671	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	1	13	2	9	13	3	10	1	13
1999-00	SAC	44	38	.537	8	Lost in round 1	1	25	8	12	22	4	5	2	21
1998-99	SAC	27	23	.540	6	Lost in round 1	1	29	17	11	28	2	4	6	18
1997-98	SAC	27	55	.329	9	—	22	23	23	21	17	14	12	27	14
1996-97	SAC	34	48	.415	9	—	16	23	21	19	20	11	14	27	18
1995-96	SAC	39	43	.476	8	Lost in round 1	14	20	19	21	27	10	16	17	11
1994-95	SAC	39	43	.476	9	—	19	8	16	17	26	14	18	17	8
1993-94	SAC	28	54	.341	10	—	13	25	21	23	16	16	15	21	23
1992-93	SAC	25	57	.305	11	—	6	26	22	18	19	23	13	7	24
1991-92	SAC	29	53	.354	10	—	15	24	23	17	21	23	18	11	2
1990-91	SAC	25	57	.305	13	—	27	8	26	24	8	25	17	23	5
1989-90	SAC	23	59	.280	12	—	23	13	23	20	9	24	13	24	15
1988-89	SAC	27	55	.329	10	—	19	17	20	20	14	14	22	22	17
1987-88	SAC	24	58	.293	10	—	12	21	20	17	19	4	11	23	7
1986-87	SAC	29	53	.354	10	—	10	19	18	16	12	4	9	23	15
1985-86	SAC	37	45	.451	7	Lost in round 1	15	14	18	10	19	15	5	23	14
1984-85	KCK	31	51	.378	9	—	5	21	17	4	20	16	2	15	21
1983-84	KCK	38	44	.463	7	Lost in round 1	12	15	16	17	13	16	5	8	14
1982-83	KCK	45	37	.549	6	—	4	15	11	4	21	10	9	8	14
1981-82	KCK	30	52	.366	9	—	13	17	19	—	17	21	12	7	14
1980-81	KCK	40	42	.488	5	Lost in the conf finals	14	10	12	—	7	16	4	13	16
1979-80	KCK	47	35	.573	5	Lost in round 1	15	4	7	—	3	15	12	5	16
1978-79	KCK	48	34	.585	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	6	10	5	—	13	17	7	5	15
1977-78	KCK	31	51	.378	10	—	9	19	17	—	15	12	12	12	16
1976-77	KCK	40	42	.488	7	—	9	13	10	—	4	13	11	8	15
1975-76	KCK	31	51	.378	8	—	12	13	16	—	5	9	9	8	13
1974-75	KCK	44	38	.537	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	11	7	9	—	4	13	14	8	11
1973-74	KCK	33	49	.402	7	—	12	8	14	—	12	16	17	1	8
1972-73	KCK	36	46	.439	7	—	8	11	13	—	—	—	6	—	—
1971-72	CIN	30	52	.366	5	—	12	13	13	—	—	—	7	—	—
1970-71	CIN	33	49	.402	6	—	3	16	14	—	—	—	8	—	—
1969-70	CIN	36	46	.439	5	—	7	12	11	—	—	—	10	—	—
1968-69	CIN	41	41	.500	5	—	4	11	8	—	—	—	4	—	—
1967-68	CIN	39	43	.476	5	—	7	7	8	—	—	—	2	—	—
1966-67	CIN	39	42	.481	3	Lost in the div semifinals	5	6	5	—	—	—	5	—	—
1965-66	CIN	45	35	.563	3	Lost in the div semifinals	3	5	4	—	—	—	6	—	—
1964-65	CIN	48	32	.600	2	Lost in the div semifinals	1	5	3	—	—	—	1	—	—
1963-64	CIN	55	25	.688	2	Lost in the div finals	1	5	3	—	—	—	1	—	—
1962-63	CIN	42	38	.525	3	Lost in the div finals	2	7	5	—	—	—	2	—	—
1961-62	CIN	43	37	.538	2	Lost in the div semifinals	2	7	5	—	—	—	1	—	—
1960-61	CIN	33	46	.418	4	—	6	8	7	—	—	—	2	—	—
1959-60	CIN	19	56	.253	4	—	7	7	8	—	—	—	4	—	—
1958-59	CIN	19	53	.264	4	—	8	8	8	—	—	—	6	—	—
1957-58	CIN	33	39	.458	2	Lost in the div semifinals	8	1	6	—	—	—	1	—	—
1956-57	ROC	31	41	.431	4	—	8	1	7	—	—	—	6	—	—
1955-56	ROC	31	41	.431	5	—	7	4	8	—	—	—	3	—	—
1954-55	ROC	29	43	.403	3	Lost in the div semifinals	7	4	7	—	—	—	6	—	—
1953-54	ROC	44	28	.611	2	Lost in the div finals	4	3	3	—	—	—	6	—	—
1952-53	ROC	44	26	.629	2	Lost in the div semifinals	2	7	4	—	—	—	4	—	—
1951-52	ROC	41	25	.621	1	Lost in the div finals	4	5	4	—	—	—	2	—	—
1950-51	ROC	41	27	.603	2	Champion	5	3	3	—	—	—	9	—	—
1949-50	ROC	51	17	.750	1	Lost in round 1	6	1	3	—	—	—	8	—	—
1948-49	ROC	45	15	.750	1	Lost in the div finals	1	2	2	—	—	—	2	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

SAC サクラメント・キングスSacramento Kings 2010-11

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2010-11 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

SAC サクラメント・キングスSacramento Kings 2010-11

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2010-11 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary