MIA #24 ヘイウッド・ハイスミスHaywood Highsmith Haywood Highsmith

74 G

24.6

PPG6.5

RPG3.4

APG1.5

SPG0.9

BPG0.5

FG%45.8

3P%38.2

FT%72.1

GFC196cm/100kg6'5"/220lbUSAThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 74 games / 24.6 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 10.0Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 58.3%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 11.1%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 3.20km1.99mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.63 / Def 7.00 km/hOff 4.74 / Def 4.35 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim26Paint10Mid-range23P56FT7

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition20PnR4Iso / Post0Spot up52Cut / Screen12Putback7Other5

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested15Off. free14Def. contested12Def. free60

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"13190–198cm6'3"–6'6"33198–206cm6'6"–6'9"36206cm and up6'9" and up19

Offense

None

Defense

None

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

FScoringTop 92.3%(#397 of 430)

PTS / 100 possessions

C2P finishingTop 44.9%(#182 of 405)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

C3P finishingTop 35.0%(#124 of 354)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

DFT shootingTop 68.7%(#274 of 399)

FT%

On-ball

EPlaymakingTop 77.1%(#329 of 430)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

—Half-court creationNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Frequency

—

Efficiency

—

FDrivingTop 95.1%(#333 of 350)

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

BBall securityTop 23.0%(#99 of 430)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

ECuttingTop 77.4%(#233 of 301)

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

CScreeningTop 39.1%(#168 of 430)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

DReboundingTop 61.4%(#260 of 430)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

DRebound conversionTop 74.0%(#318 of 430)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

CBox-outsTop 39.3%(#169 of 430)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

AOn-ball defenseTop 4.4%(#19 of 430)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

CRim protectionTop 42.9%(#161 of 375)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

EHustleTop 78.3%(#336 of 430)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2018-19	PHI	F	22	5	8.0	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2019-20	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2020-21	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2021-22	MIA	F	25	19	8.6	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2022-23	MIA	F	26	54	17.9	F	D	D	F	E	—	F	E	F	C	C	C	C	A	C	E
2023-24	MIA	F	27	66	20.7	E	C	C	E	E	—	F	B	D	D	D	C	C	S	B	D	ACE
2024-25	MIA	F	28	74	24.6	F	C	C	D	E	—	F	B	E	C	D	D	C	A	C	E
2025-26	PHX	F	29	7	13.0	No grade — below the minutes cutoff

View

179 / 391(45.8%)Not shown on the chart: Beyond 30 ft: 1 (they are included in the table below)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	93	62	66.7%	66.4%	+0.3
Above the break 3 · Left wing	61	19	31.1%	35.7%	−4.6
Left corner 3 · Left	59	26	44.1%	38.6%	+5.5
Right corner 3 · Right	53	24	45.3%	39.0%	+6.3
Above the break 3 · Right wing	51	19	37.3%	35.2%	+2.1
Paint · Center	51	23	45.1%	43.9%	+1.2
Above the break 3 · Center	9	1	11.1%	34.9%	−23.8
Mid-range · Right	7	4	57.1%	43.8%	+13.3
Mid-range · Left	5	1	20.0%	42.3%	−22.3
Paint · Right	1	0	0.0%	44.4%	−44.4
Mid-range · Right wing	1	0	0.0%	38.7%	−38.7

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2018-19	PHI	F	22	5	0	8.0	0.8	2.0	40.0	0.6	1.0	60.0	0.2	1.0	20.0	0.0	0.4	0.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.4	0.2	0.0	0.2	0.2	1.8
2019-20	—	—	—	Did not play
2020-21	—	—	—	Did not play
2021-22	MIA	F	25	19	1	8.6	0.8	2.4	34.8	0.4	0.9	38.9	0.5	1.5	32.1	0.1	0.3	40.0	0.5	0.8	1.4	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.2	0.7	2.3
2022-23	MIA	F	26	54	11	17.9	1.7	4.0	43.1	1.0	2.0	52.3	0.7	2.0	33.9	0.2	0.5	46.4	1.1	2.4	3.5	0.8	0.7	0.3	0.8	1.5	4.4
2023-24	MIA	F	27	66	26	20.7	2.3	5.0	46.5	1.2	2.1	56.2	1.2	2.9	39.6	0.3	0.5	63.9	1.0	2.2	3.2	1.1	0.8	0.5	0.5	1.8	6.1
2024-25	MIA	F	28	74	42	24.6	2.4	5.3	45.8	1.2	2.1	57.0	1.2	3.1	38.2	0.4	0.6	72.1	1.0	2.4	3.4	1.5	0.9	0.5	0.7	2.2	6.5
2025-26	PHX	F	29	7	0	13.0	1.7	3.3	52.2	0.6	1.3	44.4	1.1	2.0	57.1	0.9	1.0	85.7	0.9	1.0	1.9	1.0	0.6	0.0	0.0	1.3	5.4

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2018-19	PHI	F	22	Did not play
2019-20	—	—	—	Did not play
2020-21	—	—	—	Did not play
2021-22	MIA	F	25	8	0	3.9	0.4	0.9	42.9	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.4	0.6	60.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.4	0.6	0.4	0.0	0.0	0.4	0.3	1.1
2022-23	MIA	F	26	18	0	8.9	1.3	2.2	61.5	0.9	1.3	69.6	0.4	0.9	50.0	0.2	0.3	80.0	0.6	0.8	1.3	0.3	0.6	0.1	0.1	1.1	3.3
2023-24	MIA	F	27	5	0	25.2	2.0	5.6	35.7	1.4	2.4	58.3	0.6	3.2	18.8	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.4	2.4	2.8	1.6	0.2	0.2	0.8	2.8	4.8
2024-25	MIA	F	28	4	0	21.0	2.8	4.8	57.9	1.0	1.0	100.0	1.8	3.8	46.7	0.0	0.0	—	1.0	2.3	3.3	1.0	0.8	0.5	1.0	2.8	7.3
2025-26	PHX	F	29	2	0	5.5	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.5	1.0	1.5	0.5	0.0	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2018-19	PHI	F	22	5	8.0	4.5	41.4	45.0	11.5	6.7	6.0	0.0	14.3	7.1	103.4	131.0	-27.6	105.6	3.8	88
2019-20	—	—	—	Did not play
2020-21	—	—	—	Did not play
2021-22	MIA	F	25	19	8.6	7.0	44.6	44.6	13.1	5.2	7.6	5.6	9.7	5.3	105.6	114.0	-8.5	101.5	3.6	342
2022-23	MIA	F	26	54	18.0	8.5	51.7	51.6	12.1	6.5	9.4	5.5	13.5	14.2	104.8	110.0	-5.2	98.3	5.8	1,985
2023-24	MIA	F	27	66	20.7	11.2	58.7	58.1	12.1	7.4	7.8	4.8	10.7	7.6	110.1	109.0	1.1	97.7	6.7	2,769
2024-25	MIA	F	28	74	24.6	10.0	58.3	57.2	11.1	8.4	6.9	4.0	9.8	9.4	111.8	110.4	1.4	97.3	5.7	3,691
2025-26	PHX	F	29	7	13.0	17.7	72.9	69.6	12.1	11.9	7.2	6.2	8.4	0.0	117.8	116.1	1.7	93.6	10.7	180

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }

See other players

Same team, 2024-25 タイラー・ヒーローTyler Herro MIA · G · 25

Played 77 games / 35.4 min per game

PER 19.6TS% 60.5%USG% 27.1%

Distance 4.47km2.78mi / gameSpeed Off 7.81 / Def 6.34 km/hOff 4.85 / Def 3.94 mph

Same team, 2023-24 ジミー・バトラーJimmy Butler III MIA · F · 34

Played 60 games / 34.0 min per game

PER 22.0TS% 62.6%USG% 23.5%

Distance 3.99km2.48mi / gameSpeed Off 6.94 / Def 6.21 km/hOff 4.31 / Def 3.86 mph

Played 64 games / 27.2 min per game

PER 11.9TS% 60.1%USG% 14.4%

Distance 3.59km2.23mi / gameSpeed Off 7.76 / Def 7.03 km/hOff 4.82 / Def 4.37 mph

Played 58 games / 16.0 min per game

PER 12.2TS% 63.7%USG% 12.7%

Distance 1.95km1.21mi / gameSpeed Off 7.27 / Def 6.41 km/hOff 4.52 / Def 3.98 mph