MIA #24 ヘイウッド・ハイスミスHaywood Highsmith Haywood Highsmith

54 G

17.9

PPG4.4

RPG3.5

APG0.8

SPG0.7

BPG0.3

FG%43.1

3P%33.9

FT%46.4

GFC196cm/100kg6'5"/220lbUSAThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 54 games / 17.9 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 8.5Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 51.7%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 12.1%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 2.29km1.42mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.53 / Def 6.68 km/hOff 4.68 / Def 4.15 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim35Paint9Mid-range43P47FT6

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition17PnR6Iso / Post0Spot up40Cut / Screen19Putback11Other6

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested14Off. free17Def. contested14Def. free55

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"9190–198cm6'3"–6'6"36198–206cm6'6"–6'9"31206cm and up6'9" and up24

Offense

None

Defense

None

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

FScoringTop 94.6%(#385 of 407)

PTS / 100 possessions

D2P finishingTop 66.2%(#255 of 385)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

D3P finishingTop 62.7%(#210 of 335)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

FFT shootingTop 95.8%(#367 of 383)

FT%

On-ball

EPlaymakingTop 86.0%(#349 of 407)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

—Half-court creationNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Frequency

—

Efficiency

—

FDrivingTop 97.8%(#313 of 320)

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

EBall securityTop 75.7%(#308 of 407)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

FCuttingTop 94.9%(#282 of 297)

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

CScreeningTop 41.5%(#169 of 407)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

CReboundingTop 35.1%(#142 of 407)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

CRebound conversionTop 37.8%(#154 of 407)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

CBox-outsTop 34.9%(#142 of 407)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

AOn-ball defenseTop 3.9%(#16 of 407)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

CRim protectionTop 33.7%(#126 of 374)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

EHustleTop 76.9%(#313 of 407)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2018-19	PHI	F	22	5	8.0	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2019-20	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2020-21	—	—	—	—	—	Did not play
2021-22	MIA	F	25	19	8.6	No grade — below the minutes cutoff
2022-23	MIA	F	26	54	17.9	F	D	D	F	E	—	F	E	F	C	C	C	C	A	C	E
2023-24	MIA	F	27	66	20.7	E	C	C	E	E	—	F	B	D	D	D	C	C	S	B	D	ACE
2024-25	MIA	F	28	74	24.6	F	C	C	D	E	—	F	B	E	C	D	D	C	A	C	E
2025-26	PHX	F	29	7	13.0	No grade — below the minutes cutoff

View

93 / 216(43.1%)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	60	41	68.3%	66.6%	+1.7
Above the break 3 · Right wing	28	12	42.9%	35.6%	+7.2
Right corner 3 · Right	28	8	28.6%	38.5%	−10.0
Paint · Center	27	10	37.0%	43.3%	−6.3
Above the break 3 · Left wing	23	5	21.7%	35.9%	−14.1
Left corner 3 · Left	22	9	40.9%	38.5%	+2.4
Above the break 3 · Center	8	3	37.5%	34.6%	+2.9
Mid-range · Right	8	2	25.0%	42.6%	−17.6
Mid-range · Left	7	2	28.6%	42.0%	−13.4
Paint · Left	2	0	0.0%	44.3%	−44.3
Mid-range · Center	1	0	0.0%	45.2%	−45.2
Mid-range · Left wing	1	0	0.0%	40.9%	−40.9
Mid-range · Right wing	1	1	100.0%	42.3%	+57.7

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2018-19	PHI	F	22	5	0	8.0	0.8	2.0	40.0	0.6	1.0	60.0	0.2	1.0	20.0	0.0	0.4	0.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.4	0.2	0.0	0.2	0.2	1.8
2019-20	—	—	—	Did not play
2020-21	—	—	—	Did not play
2021-22	MIA	F	25	19	1	8.6	0.8	2.4	34.8	0.4	0.9	38.9	0.5	1.5	32.1	0.1	0.3	40.0	0.5	0.8	1.4	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.2	0.7	2.3
2022-23	MIA	F	26	54	11	17.9	1.7	4.0	43.1	1.0	2.0	52.3	0.7	2.0	33.9	0.2	0.5	46.4	1.1	2.4	3.5	0.8	0.7	0.3	0.8	1.5	4.4
2023-24	MIA	F	27	66	26	20.7	2.3	5.0	46.5	1.2	2.1	56.2	1.2	2.9	39.6	0.3	0.5	63.9	1.0	2.2	3.2	1.1	0.8	0.5	0.5	1.8	6.1
2024-25	MIA	F	28	74	42	24.6	2.4	5.3	45.8	1.2	2.1	57.0	1.2	3.1	38.2	0.4	0.6	72.1	1.0	2.4	3.4	1.5	0.9	0.5	0.7	2.2	6.5
2025-26	PHX	F	29	7	0	13.0	1.7	3.3	52.2	0.6	1.3	44.4	1.1	2.0	57.1	0.9	1.0	85.7	0.9	1.0	1.9	1.0	0.6	0.0	0.0	1.3	5.4

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2018-19	PHI	F	22	Did not play
2019-20	—	—	—	Did not play
2020-21	—	—	—	Did not play
2021-22	MIA	F	25	8	0	3.9	0.4	0.9	42.9	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.4	0.6	60.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.4	0.6	0.4	0.0	0.0	0.4	0.3	1.1
2022-23	MIA	F	26	18	0	8.9	1.3	2.2	61.5	0.9	1.3	69.6	0.4	0.9	50.0	0.2	0.3	80.0	0.6	0.8	1.3	0.3	0.6	0.1	0.1	1.1	3.3
2023-24	MIA	F	27	5	0	25.2	2.0	5.6	35.7	1.4	2.4	58.3	0.6	3.2	18.8	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.4	2.4	2.8	1.6	0.2	0.2	0.8	2.8	4.8
2024-25	MIA	F	28	4	0	21.0	2.8	4.8	57.9	1.0	1.0	100.0	1.8	3.8	46.7	0.0	0.0	—	1.0	2.3	3.3	1.0	0.8	0.5	1.0	2.8	7.3
2025-26	PHX	F	29	2	0	5.5	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.5	1.0	1.5	0.5	0.0	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2018-19	PHI	F	22	5	8.0	4.5	41.4	45.0	11.5	6.7	6.0	0.0	14.3	7.1	103.4	131.0	-27.6	105.6	3.8	88
2019-20	—	—	—	Did not play
2020-21	—	—	—	Did not play
2021-22	MIA	F	25	19	8.6	7.0	44.6	44.6	13.1	5.2	7.6	5.6	9.7	5.3	105.6	114.0	-8.5	101.5	3.6	342
2022-23	MIA	F	26	54	18.0	8.5	51.7	51.6	12.1	6.5	9.4	5.5	13.5	14.2	104.8	110.0	-5.2	98.3	5.8	1,985
2023-24	MIA	F	27	66	20.7	11.2	58.7	58.1	12.1	7.4	7.8	4.8	10.7	7.6	110.1	109.0	1.1	97.7	6.7	2,769
2024-25	MIA	F	28	74	24.6	10.0	58.3	57.2	11.1	8.4	6.9	4.0	9.8	9.4	111.8	110.4	1.4	97.3	5.7	3,691
2025-26	PHX	F	29	7	13.0	17.7	72.9	69.6	12.1	11.9	7.2	6.2	8.4	0.0	117.8	116.1	1.7	93.6	10.7	180

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }

See other players

Same team, 2022-23 タイラー・ヒーローTyler Herro MIA · G · 23

Played 67 games / 34.9 min per game

PER 15.3TS% 56.6%USG% 25.0%

Distance 4.26km2.65mi / gameSpeed Off 7.45 / Def 6.28 km/hOff 4.63 / Def 3.90 mph

Same team, 2021-22 カイル・ラウリーKyle Lowry MIA · G · 35

Played 63 games / 33.9 min per game

PER 15.0TS% 60.0%USG% 17.8%

Distance 3.67km2.28mi / gameSpeed Off 6.65 / Def 5.47 km/hOff 4.13 / Def 3.40 mph

Played 69 games / 14.0 min per game

PER 7.0TS% 50.6%USG% 13.0%

Distance 1.77km1.10mi / gameSpeed Off 7.74 / Def 6.45 km/hOff 4.81 / Def 4.01 mph

Played 38 games / 14.1 min per game

PER 5.4TS% 46.9%USG% 11.5%

Distance 1.72km1.07mi / gameSpeed Off 7.48 / Def 6.34 km/hOff 4.65 / Def 3.94 mph