UTA #3 トレイ・バークTrey Burke Trey Burke

70 G

32.3

PPG12.8

RPG3.0

APG5.7

SPG0.6

BPG0.1

FG%38.0

3P%33.0

FT%90.3

GFC183cm/84kgThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle
2013-14	UTA	G	21	70	32.3	C	E	E	A	B	D	F	A	E		E	D
2014-15	UTA	G	22	76	30.1	C	F	E	D	B	D	E	A	E		E	F
2015-16	UTA	G	23	64	21.3	B	D	D	C	B	B	E	B	C		F	E
2016-17	WAS	G	24	57	12.3	C	C	B	D	B	C	E	D	—	E	G	D			—
2017-18	NYK	G	25	36	21.8	B	S	C	E	A	A	D	B	—	D	E	D	F	E	E	C
2018-19	NYK/DAL	G	26	58	19.4	B	D	C	B	B	A	B	A	—	D	F	E	F	B	D	D
2019-20	PHI/DAL	G	27	33	15.8	C	D	B	C	B	C	C	B	—	D	E	C	F	D	—	E
2020-21	DAL	G	28	62	14.7	C	C	D	B	C	B	C	B	—	C	G	C	E	D	E	E
2021-22	DAL	G	29	42	10.5	C	D	D	C	B	C	C	C	—	D	G	C	E	E	—	C

View

341 / 896(38.1%)Not shown on the chart: No location: 1 · Beyond 30 ft: 8 (they are included in the table below)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	153	75	49.0%	60.8%	−11.8
Above the break 3 · Left wing	116	36	31.0%	35.6%	−4.6
Above the break 3 · Center	93	29	31.2%	35.6%	−4.4
Above the break 3 · Right wing	83	31	37.3%	34.9%	+2.5
Paint · Center	78	28	35.9%	38.8%	−2.9
Mid-range · Right	69	21	30.4%	39.2%	−8.8
Mid-range · Left wing	63	27	42.9%	39.7%	+3.2
Mid-range · Right wing	63	27	42.9%	39.3%	+3.5
Mid-range · Left	55	23	41.8%	39.0%	+2.8
Mid-range · Center	54	20	37.0%	42.4%	−5.4
Left corner 3 · Left	24	8	33.3%	39.1%	−5.8
Paint · Left	15	5	33.3%	38.7%	−5.3
Right corner 3 · Right	15	7	46.7%	38.9%	+7.7
Paint · Right	11	4	36.4%	40.0%	−3.7
Backcourt	3	0	0.0%	3.6%	−3.6
Above the break 3 · Backcourt	1	0	0.0%	6.3%	−6.3

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored. The NBA only publishes shot coordinates from 1996-97 on.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2013-14	UTA	G	21	70	68	32.3	4.9	12.8	38.0	3.3	8.0	41.0	1.6	4.8	33.0	1.5	1.6	90.3	0.5	2.4	3.0	5.7	0.6	0.1	1.9	2.1	12.8
2014-15	UTA	G	22	76	43	30.1	4.9	13.2	36.8	3.2	8.1	40.0	1.6	5.1	31.8	1.4	1.9	75.2	0.4	2.3	2.7	4.3	0.9	0.2	1.6	1.6	12.8
2015-16	UTA	G	23	64	0	21.3	4.1	9.9	41.3	2.7	5.9	46.0	1.4	4.0	34.4	1.0	1.3	81.7	0.3	1.5	1.8	2.3	0.5	0.1	1.3	1.3	10.6
2016-17	WAS	G	24	57	0	12.3	2.0	4.5	45.5	1.5	3.2	45.9	0.5	1.2	44.3	0.4	0.5	75.9	0.1	0.7	0.8	1.8	0.2	0.1	0.8	0.9	5.0
2017-18	NYK	G	25	36	9	21.8	5.4	10.7	50.3	4.3	7.8	55.6	1.1	2.9	36.2	1.0	1.6	64.9	0.4	1.6	2.0	4.7	0.7	0.1	1.2	1.2	12.8
2018-19	NYK/DAL	G	26	58	8	19.4	4.1	9.4	43.1	3.1	6.7	46.3	1.0	2.7	35.2	1.8	2.1	83.1	0.5	1.2	1.7	2.7	0.6	0.1	0.8	1.0	10.9
	NYK			33	7	20.9	4.5	10.8	41.3	3.6	8.2	43.4	0.9	2.6	34.9	1.9	2.3	82.7	0.5	1.4	1.9	2.8	0.6	0.2	0.9	1.0	11.8
	DAL			25	1	17.4	3.5	7.6	46.3	2.5	4.7	53.0	1.0	2.9	35.6	1.6	2.0	83.7	0.5	1.0	1.5	2.6	0.5	0.1	0.8	1.0	9.7
2019-20	PHI/DAL	G	27	33	1	15.8	2.8	6.3	45.0	1.9	4.1	46.3	1.0	2.3	42.7	0.7	0.9	79.3	0.5	1.0	1.5	2.5	0.5	0.1	0.6	1.0	7.4
	PHI			25	0	13.2	2.4	5.1	46.5	1.7	3.6	48.3	0.6	1.5	42.1	0.5	0.7	72.2	0.6	0.8	1.4	2.1	0.3	0.0	0.5	0.8	5.9
	DAL			8	1	23.9	4.4	10.3	42.7	2.4	5.6	42.2	2.0	4.6	43.2	1.3	1.4	90.9	0.1	1.8	1.9	3.8	1.1	0.1	1.1	1.5	12.0
2020-21	DAL	G	28	62	1	14.7	2.4	5.7	42.8	1.5	3.0	49.2	0.9	2.6	35.4	0.8	0.9	89.5	0.2	0.7	0.9	1.3	0.6	0.1	0.5	1.0	6.6
2021-22	DAL	G	29	42	0	10.5	2.0	5.1	39.1	1.4	3.2	43.6	0.6	2.0	31.7	0.5	0.5	87.0	0.1	0.7	0.8	1.4	0.3	0.0	0.6	0.9	5.1

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2013-14	UTA	G	21	Missed the playoffs
2014-15	UTA	G	22	Missed the playoffs
2015-16	UTA	G	23	Missed the playoffs
2016-17	WAS	G	24	3	0	6.7	0.0	1.3	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.0
2017-18	NYK	G	25	Missed the playoffs
2018-19	NYK/DAL	G	26	Missed the playoffs
	NYK			33	7	20.9	4.5	10.8	41.3	3.6	8.2	43.4	0.9	2.6	34.9	1.9	2.3	82.7	0.5	1.4	1.9	2.8	0.6	0.2	0.9	1.0	11.8
	DAL			25	1	17.4	3.5	7.6	46.3	2.5	4.7	53.0	1.0	2.9	35.6	1.6	2.0	83.7	0.5	1.0	1.5	2.6	0.5	0.1	0.8	1.0	9.7
2019-20	DAL	G	27	6	3	26.0	5.0	9.8	50.8	3.7	7.0	52.4	1.3	2.8	47.1	1.0	1.7	60.0	0.3	2.8	3.2	2.0	1.3	0.3	1.0	2.3	12.3
2020-21	DAL	G	28	2	0	8.5	0.0	3.5	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	1.5	0.0	0.5	1.0	50.0	0.5	0.0	0.5	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.5
2021-22	DAL	G	29	10	0	3.7	1.1	2.2	50.0	0.7	1.2	58.3	0.4	1.0	40.0	0.6	0.6	100.0	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.4	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.3	3.2

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2013-14	UTA	G	21	70	32.3	12.5	47.3	44.2	21.6	28.0	4.8	1.7	8.1	8.9	105.3	111.2	-5.9	93.0	8.3	4,385
2014-15	UTA	G	22	76	30.1	12.6	45.5	43.0	23.2	24.5	4.5	1.4	7.7	8.2	103.6	105.3	-1.7	92.5	8.5	4,422
2015-16	UTA	G	23	64	21.3	14.0	50.7	48.3	24.2	20.1	4.1	1.3	7.0	8.9	102.3	102.6	-0.4	93.5	9.9	2,666
2016-17	WAS	G	24	57	12.3	10.8	53.2	51.6	20.0	23.0	3.4	1.0	5.7	11.6	98.6	108.8	-10.2	96.7	8.1	1,408
2017-18	NYK	G	25	36	21.8	20.9	56.3	55.2	24.9	32.9	4.5	1.7	7.4	6.9	111.1	115.3	-4.2	98.7	12.9	1,607
2018-19	NYK/DAL	G	26	58	19.4	16.5	52.4	48.2	24.2	22.9	4.1	2.3	5.9	6.1	107.0	108.4	-1.5	101.2	10.8	2,370
2019-20	PHI/DAL	G	27	33	15.8	15.6	54.8	52.6	19.6	23.4	4.8	3.0	6.6	6.4	113.7	111.7	2.0	99.0	10.2	1,074
2020-21	DAL	G	28	62	14.7	12.6	54.4	51.0	19.3	12.9	2.9	1.1	4.7	6.7	111.5	110.2	1.3	99.9	7.6	1,893
2021-22	DAL	G	29	42	10.5	9.9	47.5	45.1	25.0	21.9	3.7	0.9	6.4	8.4	103.6	104.2	-0.5	99.2	6.9	909

/* 押しても何も起きないタブの行（タブ・プルダウン・描き方）は出さない */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }