NYK #23 トレイ・バークTrey Burke Trey Burke

36 G

21.8

PPG12.8

RPG2.0

APG4.7

SPG0.7

BPG0.1

FG%50.3

3P%36.2

FT%64.9

GFC185cm/87kg6'1"/191lbUSAThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 36 games / 21.8 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 20.9Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 56.3%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 24.9%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 2.61km1.62mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.84 / Def 6.71 km/hOff 4.87 / Def 4.17 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim20Paint9Mid-range393P25FT8

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition15PnR44Iso / Post13Spot up14Cut / Screen3Putback0Other11

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested4Off. free14Def. contested9Def. free73

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"35190–198cm6'3"–6'6"37198–206cm6'6"–6'9"15206cm and up6'9" and up14

Offense

Defense

None

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

BScoringTop 8.4%(#33 of 392)

PTS / 100 possessions

S2P finishingTop 1.0%(#4 of 386)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

C3P finishingTop 39.5%(#117 of 296)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

EFT shootingTop 84.4%(#319 of 378)

FT%

On-ball

APlaymakingTop 3.3%(#13 of 392)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

AHalf-court creationTop 4.9%(#15 of 308)

Frequency

Efficiency

DDrivingTop 69.6%(#218 of 313)

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

BBall securityTop 9.7%(#38 of 392)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

—CuttingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

DScreeningTop 69.4%(#272 of 392)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

EReboundingTop 90.8%(#355 of 392)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

DRebound conversionTop 52.6%(#206 of 392)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

FBox-outsTop 96.2%(#377 of 392)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

EOn-ball defenseTop 77.0%(#302 of 392)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

ERim protectionTop 83.7%(#292 of 349)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

CHustleTop 45.4%(#178 of 392)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2013-14	UTA	G	21	70	32.3	C	E	E	A	B	D	F	A	E		E	D
2014-15	UTA	G	22	76	30.1	C	F	E	D	B	D	E	A	E		E	F
2015-16	UTA	G	23	64	21.3	B	D	D	C	B	B	E	B	C		F	E
2016-17	WAS	G	24	57	12.3	C	C	B	D	B	C	E	D	—	E	G	D			—
2017-18	NYK	G	25	36	21.8	B	S	C	E	A	A	D	B	—	D	E	D	F	E	E	C	MIDD&KPULLHNDL
2018-19	NYK/DAL	G	26	58	19.4	B	D	C	B	B	A	B	A	—	D	F	E	F	B	D	D	MIDPULLHNDL
2019-20	PHI/DAL	G	27	33	15.8	C	D	B	C	B	C	C	B	—	D	E	C	F	D	—	E	MIDHNDL
2020-21	DAL	G	28	62	14.7	C	C	D	B	C	B	C	B	—	C	G	C	E	D	E	E	MIDD&K
2021-22	DAL	G	29	42	10.5	C	D	D	C	B	C	C	C	—	D	G	C	E	E	—	C	MIDD&K

View

193 / 384(50.3%)Not shown on the chart: Beyond 30 ft: 4 (they are included in the table below)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	64	46	71.9%	63.1%	+8.8
Paint · Center	42	20	47.6%	38.4%	+9.2
Mid-range · Center	42	25	59.5%	42.4%	+17.2
Mid-range · Left wing	37	17	45.9%	39.6%	+6.3
Mid-range · Right wing	35	19	54.3%	39.1%	+15.2
Above the break 3 · Left wing	33	12	36.4%	35.6%	+0.8
Above the break 3 · Center	29	10	34.5%	36.0%	−1.5
Mid-range · Left	27	17	63.0%	40.2%	+22.7
Above the break 3 · Right wing	25	9	36.0%	35.5%	+0.5
Mid-range · Right	25	11	44.0%	40.9%	+3.1
Left corner 3 · Left	10	5	50.0%	38.4%	+11.6
Paint · Right	5	0	0.0%	40.5%	−40.5
Right corner 3 · Right	5	2	40.0%	40.4%	−0.4
Backcourt	3	0	0.0%	1.0%	−1.0
Paint · Left	2	0	0.0%	39.8%	−39.8

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2013-14	UTA	G	21	70	68	32.3	4.9	12.8	38.0	3.3	8.0	41.0	1.6	4.8	33.0	1.5	1.6	90.3	0.5	2.4	3.0	5.7	0.6	0.1	1.9	2.1	12.8
2014-15	UTA	G	22	76	43	30.1	4.9	13.2	36.8	3.2	8.1	40.0	1.6	5.1	31.8	1.4	1.9	75.2	0.4	2.3	2.7	4.3	0.9	0.2	1.6	1.6	12.8
2015-16	UTA	G	23	64	0	21.3	4.1	9.9	41.3	2.7	5.9	46.0	1.4	4.0	34.4	1.0	1.3	81.7	0.3	1.5	1.8	2.3	0.5	0.1	1.3	1.3	10.6
2016-17	WAS	G	24	57	0	12.3	2.0	4.5	45.5	1.5	3.2	45.9	0.5	1.2	44.3	0.4	0.5	75.9	0.1	0.7	0.8	1.8	0.2	0.1	0.8	0.9	5.0
2017-18	NYK	G	25	36	9	21.8	5.4	10.7	50.3	4.3	7.8	55.6	1.1	2.9	36.2	1.0	1.6	64.9	0.4	1.6	2.0	4.7	0.7	0.1	1.2	1.2	12.8
2018-19	NYK/DAL	G	26	58	8	19.4	4.1	9.4	43.1	3.1	6.7	46.3	1.0	2.7	35.2	1.8	2.1	83.1	0.5	1.2	1.7	2.7	0.6	0.1	0.8	1.0	10.9
	NYK			33	7	20.9	4.5	10.8	41.3	3.6	8.2	43.4	0.9	2.6	34.9	1.9	2.3	82.7	0.5	1.4	1.9	2.8	0.6	0.2	0.9	1.0	11.8
	DAL			25	1	17.4	3.5	7.6	46.3	2.5	4.7	53.0	1.0	2.9	35.6	1.6	2.0	83.7	0.5	1.0	1.5	2.6	0.5	0.1	0.8	1.0	9.7
2019-20	PHI/DAL	G	27	33	1	15.8	2.8	6.3	45.0	1.9	4.1	46.3	1.0	2.3	42.7	0.7	0.9	79.3	0.5	1.0	1.5	2.5	0.5	0.1	0.6	1.0	7.4
	PHI			25	0	13.2	2.4	5.1	46.5	1.7	3.6	48.3	0.6	1.5	42.1	0.5	0.7	72.2	0.6	0.8	1.4	2.1	0.3	0.0	0.5	0.8	5.9
	DAL			8	1	23.9	4.4	10.3	42.7	2.4	5.6	42.2	2.0	4.6	43.2	1.3	1.4	90.9	0.1	1.8	1.9	3.8	1.1	0.1	1.1	1.5	12.0
2020-21	DAL	G	28	62	1	14.7	2.4	5.7	42.8	1.5	3.0	49.2	0.9	2.6	35.4	0.8	0.9	89.5	0.2	0.7	0.9	1.3	0.6	0.1	0.5	1.0	6.6
2021-22	DAL	G	29	42	0	10.5	2.0	5.1	39.1	1.4	3.2	43.6	0.6	2.0	31.7	0.5	0.5	87.0	0.1	0.7	0.8	1.4	0.3	0.0	0.6	0.9	5.1

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2013-14	UTA	G	21	Missed the playoffs
2014-15	UTA	G	22	Missed the playoffs
2015-16	UTA	G	23	Missed the playoffs
2016-17	WAS	G	24	3	0	6.7	0.0	1.3	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.0
2017-18	NYK	G	25	Missed the playoffs
2018-19	NYK/DAL	G	26	Missed the playoffs
	NYK			33	7	20.9	4.5	10.8	41.3	3.6	8.2	43.4	0.9	2.6	34.9	1.9	2.3	82.7	0.5	1.4	1.9	2.8	0.6	0.2	0.9	1.0	11.8
	DAL			25	1	17.4	3.5	7.6	46.3	2.5	4.7	53.0	1.0	2.9	35.6	1.6	2.0	83.7	0.5	1.0	1.5	2.6	0.5	0.1	0.8	1.0	9.7
2019-20	DAL	G	27	6	3	26.0	5.0	9.8	50.8	3.7	7.0	52.4	1.3	2.8	47.1	1.0	1.7	60.0	0.3	2.8	3.2	2.0	1.3	0.3	1.0	2.3	12.3
2020-21	DAL	G	28	2	0	8.5	0.0	3.5	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	1.5	0.0	0.5	1.0	50.0	0.5	0.0	0.5	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.5
2021-22	DAL	G	29	10	0	3.7	1.1	2.2	50.0	0.7	1.2	58.3	0.4	1.0	40.0	0.6	0.6	100.0	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.4	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.3	3.2

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2013-14	UTA	G	21	70	32.3	12.5	47.3	44.2	21.6	28.0	4.8	1.7	8.1	8.9	105.3	111.2	-5.9	93.0	8.3	4,385
2014-15	UTA	G	22	76	30.1	12.6	45.5	43.0	23.2	24.5	4.5	1.4	7.7	8.2	103.6	105.3	-1.7	92.5	8.5	4,422
2015-16	UTA	G	23	64	21.3	14.0	50.7	48.3	24.2	20.1	4.1	1.3	7.0	8.9	102.3	102.6	-0.4	93.5	9.9	2,666
2016-17	WAS	G	24	57	12.3	10.8	53.2	51.6	20.0	23.0	3.4	1.0	5.7	11.6	98.6	108.8	-10.2	96.7	8.1	1,408
2017-18	NYK	G	25	36	21.8	20.9	56.3	55.2	24.9	32.9	4.5	1.7	7.4	6.9	111.1	115.3	-4.2	98.7	12.9	1,607
2018-19	NYK/DAL	G	26	58	19.4	16.5	52.4	48.2	24.2	22.9	4.1	2.3	5.9	6.1	107.0	108.4	-1.5	101.2	10.8	2,370
2019-20	PHI/DAL	G	27	33	15.8	15.6	54.8	52.6	19.6	23.4	4.8	3.0	6.6	6.4	113.7	111.7	2.0	99.0	10.2	1,074
2020-21	DAL	G	28	62	14.7	12.6	54.4	51.0	19.3	12.9	2.9	1.1	4.7	6.7	111.5	110.2	1.3	99.9	7.6	1,893
2021-22	DAL	G	29	42	10.5	9.9	47.5	45.1	25.0	21.9	3.7	0.9	6.4	8.4	103.6	104.2	-0.5	99.2	6.9	909

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }