UTA #24 ウォーカー・ケスラーWalker Kessler Walker Kessler

64 G

23.3

PPG8.1

RPG7.5

APG0.9

SPG0.5

BPG2.4

FG%65.4

3P%21.1

FT%60.2

GFC213cm/111kg7'0"/245lbUSAThe country the NBA has on file. It need not match where they were born or whom they play for.Read in the glossaryHow they entered the league: which round and overall pick, or that they went undrafted.Read in the glossary

Petal length = Where a player sits from the top of the qualified pool. Lower is better; last place is 100%.Read in the glossary / dashed ring = the Eight steps from S to G, decided purely by where a player ranks in the league that season.Read in the glossary boundary

Played 64 games / 23.3 min per game

An all-in-one metric of production per minute. The NBA does not publish it, so this site computes it.Read in the glossary 17.9Shooting efficiency with both threes and free throws built in — a truer picture than FG%.Read in the glossary 66.3%How much of the team's offense a player finishes while on the floor. Lead options run high.Read in the glossary 12.7%

Distance covered during a game, given per game (kilometers or miles, set on My page).Read in the glossary 2.93km1.82mi / gameAverage speed while on the floor, split between offense and defense.Read in the glossary Off 7.55 / Def 6.61 km/hOff 4.69 / Def 4.11 mph

A bar splitting scoring, play types, rebounding and defense into shares of 100%.Read in the glossaryWhere the points came from

020406080100

Rim80Paint7Mid-range03P2FT11

Play type mixHow the possessions ended

020406080100

Transition10PnR13Iso / Post3Spot up4Cut / Screen37Putback25Other8

Rebounding mixWhere they were won, and how

020406080100

Off. contested26Off. free8Def. contested24Def. free42

Defensive mixWhat size of opponent they guarded

020406080100

Under 190cmUnder 6'3"4190–198cm6'3"–6'6"14198–206cm6'6"–6'9"26206cm and up6'9" and up56

Offense

Roll Man

Defense

Inside Defender

Other

None

Breakdown

Shooting

DScoringTop 72.4%(#299 of 413)

PTS / 100 possessions

B2P finishingTop 15.6%(#60 of 384)

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

—3P finishingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

actual points ÷ expected points by zone

FFT shootingTop 96.3%(#361 of 375)

FT%

On-ball

FPlaymakingTop 94.2%(#388 of 413)

AST% (how many of the team's baskets you had a hand in)

—Half-court creationNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Frequency

—

Efficiency

—

—DrivingNot a mark against the player — there were too few attempts to rank them.Read in the glossary

Drives

Points per drive

Fouls drawn

—

DBall securityTop 55.3%(#228 of 412)

turnovers per 100 touches

Off-ball

CCuttingTop 25.5%(#65 of 255)

PPP on cuts and off-screen plays

BScreeningTop 16.2%(#67 of 413)

screen-assist points / 100 possessions

Rebounds

BReboundingTop 8.5%(#34 of 413)

REB% (offense and defense combined)

ERebound conversionTop 82.1%(#339 of 413)

the share of balls landing near you that you came down with

BBox-outsTop 12.6%(#52 of 413)

box-outs / 100 poss

Defense

EOn-ball defenseTop 90.0%(#371 of 413)

Deflections

3P contests

Ace suppression

SRim protectionTop 0.6%(#2 of 359)

Blocks

2P contests

Rim volume

Rim FG% suppressed

EHustleTop 83.8%(#346 of 413)

Charges drawn

Loose balls on defense

By season

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Shooting				On-ball				Off-ball		Rebounds			Defense			Tags
Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	Scoring	2P	3P	FT	AST	Hub	Drive	Care	Cut	Screen	REB	Conv	BOX	1on1	Rim	Hustle	Tags
2022-23	UTA	C	21	74	23.0	D	A	—	G	E	—	—	C	B	B	A	E	A	G	S	F	ROLLID
2023-24	UTA	C	22	64	23.3	D	B	—	F	F	—	—	D	C	B	B	E	B	E	S	E	ROLLID
2024-25	UTA	C	23	58	30.0	D	A	—	G	E	—	—	E	A	B	S	C	A	D	S	F	ROLL
2025-26	UTA	C	24	5	30.8	No grade — below the minutes cutoff

View

229 / 350(65.4%)

ColorZone FG% − league average (points)+7 or better+2.5−2.5−7−7 or worse

HatchingToo few shots to measure

SizeShots taken from that cell

Zone	Att	Made	FG%	League	Diff
Rim	282	208	73.8%	66.3%	+7.4
Paint · Center	45	17	37.8%	43.4%	−5.6
Left corner 3 · Left	12	2	16.7%	38.6%	−21.9
Right corner 3 · Right	7	2	28.6%	39.4%	−10.8
Mid-range · Left	3	0	0.0%	41.7%	−41.7
Paint · Left	1	0	0.0%	44.7%	−44.7

Each hexagon is about two feet across. Size is how many shots came from that cell, color is the gap to the league average (shrunk toward that zone's FG% before comparing). Hatched cells have too few shots to measure; free throws carry no coordinates, so they are left out. Zones with fewer than 10 attempts are left uncolored.

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
2022-23	UTA	C	21	74	40	23.0	4.0	5.6	72.0	4.0	5.6	72.3	0.0	0.0	33.3	1.1	2.1	51.6	3.1	5.3	8.4	0.9	0.4	2.3	0.8	2.3	9.2
2023-24	UTA	C	22	64	22	23.3	3.6	5.5	65.4	3.5	5.2	68.0	0.1	0.3	21.1	0.9	1.5	60.2	2.6	4.9	7.5	0.9	0.5	2.4	1.0	2.1	8.1
2024-25	UTA	C	23	58	58	30.0	4.8	7.2	66.3	4.7	6.6	70.6	0.1	0.6	17.6	1.4	2.6	52.0	4.6	7.6	12.2	1.7	0.6	2.4	1.5	2.2	11.1
2025-26	UTA	C	24	5	5	30.8	5.2	7.4	70.3	4.0	5.8	69.0	1.2	1.6	75.0	2.8	4.0	70.0	4.6	6.2	10.8	3.0	1.4	1.8	3.2	4.4	14.4

Playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G
2022-23	UTA	C	21	Missed the playoffs
2023-24	UTA	C	22	Missed the playoffs
2024-25	UTA	C	23	Missed the playoffs
2025-26	UTA	C	24	Missed the playoffs

Year	Team	POS	Age	G	MP	PER	TS%	eFG%	USG%	AST%	TRB%	ORB%	DRB%	TOV%	ORtg	DRtg	NetRtg	PACE	PIE	POSS
2022-23	UTA	C	21	74	23.0	21.6	70.2	72.1	13.0	5.7	17.0	13.3	20.5	9.6	115.7	112.7	3.0	101.5	12.8	3,585
2023-24	UTA	C	22	64	23.3	17.9	66.3	66.0	12.7	5.8	15.5	10.9	19.9	12.8	111.4	116.0	-4.5	100.8	10.9	3,132
2024-25	UTA	C	23	58	30.0	20.0	66.0	67.1	13.3	8.3	19.0	14.5	23.5	13.0	109.2	118.3	-9.1	100.8	12.7	3,656
2025-26	UTA	C	24	5	30.8	20.6	78.6	78.4	16.7	15.5	16.7	14.9	18.3	20.8	118.8	114.0	4.8	98.0	13.8	314

/* 切り替えられないのでタブの行とプルダウンは出さない。全面を縦に並べて全部読めるようにする。 `[hidden]` は行（移籍の内訳）にも付いているので、**面だけ**を狙う。 */ .ptabs, .facebar { display: none; } .ppanes > [data-pane][hidden] { display: block !important; }