CHA シャーロット・ボブキャッツCharlotte Bobcats 2009-10

Record: 44W38L
Conference: East 7
Playoffs: Lost in round 1
League: 15

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2009-10 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 10-4vs ORL#2
1. @−9
2. @−15
3. −4
4. −9

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

1615141319

Points

1812191216

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#32	ボリス・ディアウBoris Diaw	F	27	82	82	35.4	4.5	9.4	48.3	3.7	6.9	54.1	0.8	2.5	32.0	1.4	1.8	76.9	1.6	3.6	5.2	4.0	0.7	0.7	2.2	2.7	11.3
#20	レイモンド・フェルトンRaymond Felton	G	25	80	80	33.0	4.9	10.6	45.9	4.1	8.6	47.5	0.8	2.0	38.5	1.7	2.2	76.3	0.7	2.9	3.6	5.6	1.5	0.3	2.1	2.2	12.1
#14	DJ・オーガスティンD.J. Augustin	G	22	80	2	18.4	2.1	5.4	38.6	1.2	3.2	38.1	0.9	2.2	39.3	1.3	1.6	77.9	0.1	1.1	1.2	2.4	0.6	0.1	0.9	1.6	6.4
#3	ジェラルド・ウォレスGerald Wallace	F	27	76	76	41.0	6.0	12.4	48.4	5.3	10.6	50.3	0.7	1.8	37.1	5.6	7.2	77.6	2.0	8.1	10.0	2.1	1.5	1.1	2.3	2.6	18.2
#1	スティーブン・ジャクソンStephen Jackson	G/F	31	72	72	39.3	7.6	17.8	42.3	5.9	12.9	45.7	1.6	4.9	33.4	4.3	5.5	78.6	1.0	4.1	5.1	3.6	1.6	0.5	3.2	2.5	21.1
#23	スティーブン・グラハムStephen Graham	G/F	27	70	8	11.5	1.7	3.4	49.6	1.5	2.7	54.2	0.2	0.7	32.0	0.6	0.9	64.6	0.3	1.6	1.9	0.3	0.3	0.1	0.5	1.3	4.2
#13	ナジー・モハメドNazr Mohammed	C	32	58	29	17.0	3.3	5.9	55.3	3.3	5.9	55.3	0.0	0.0	—	1.4	2.2	64.8	2.0	3.3	5.2	0.5	0.3	0.7	0.9	1.8	7.9
#4	デリック・ブラウンDerrick Brown	F	22	57	0	9.4	1.2	2.6	46.3	1.2	2.5	47.1	0.0	0.1	28.6	0.8	1.3	66.7	0.5	0.8	1.4	0.3	0.4	0.2	0.3	0.9	3.3
#6	タイソン・チャンドラーTyson Chandler	C	27	51	27	22.8	2.1	3.7	57.4	2.1	3.7	57.4	0.0	0.0	—	2.3	3.1	73.2	2.2	4.0	6.3	0.3	0.3	1.1	1.8	2.7	6.5
#22	ロナルド・マレーFlip Murray	G	30	46	1	21.6	3.5	8.9	38.9	2.6	6.1	42.5	0.9	2.8	31.3	2.0	2.8	71.0	0.3	1.8	2.1	1.8	0.6	0.3	1.4	1.7	9.9
#15	ジェラルド・ヘンダーソンJr.Gerald Henderson	G	22	43	0	8.3	0.9	2.4	35.6	0.8	2.0	38.8	0.1	0.4	21.1	0.8	1.1	74.5	0.3	0.9	1.3	0.3	0.2	0.2	0.3	0.6	2.6
#42	テオ・ラトリフTheo Ratliff	C	36	28	26	22.3	1.9	4.1	46.6	1.9	4.1	46.6	0.0	0.0	—	1.3	1.6	78.3	1.6	2.6	4.2	0.6	0.3	1.5	0.9	2.1	5.1
#7	サガナ・ジョップDeSagana Diop	C	28	27	0	9.7	0.6	1.1	51.7	0.6	1.1	51.7	0.0	0.0	—	0.1	0.3	22.2	0.9	1.5	2.4	0.2	0.2	0.5	0.4	1.1	1.2
#12	タイラス・トーマスTyrus Thomas	F	23	25	0	21.7	3.8	8.6	44.2	3.8	8.5	44.6	0.0	0.1	0.0	2.5	3.4	72.9	1.6	4.5	6.1	0.9	0.9	1.5	1.6	2.6	10.1
#0	ラリー・ヒューズLarry Hughes	G	31	14	2	21.1	2.5	7.6	32.7	1.4	4.6	30.8	1.1	3.0	35.7	2.1	2.4	85.3	0.5	1.8	2.3	2.0	0.9	0.3	1.4	1.2	8.1
#2	エイシー・ローAcie Law	G	25	9	0	3.7	0.6	1.8	31.3	0.6	1.7	33.3	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.7	0.8	85.7	0.0	0.1	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.1	0.3	0.3	1.8
#10	ウラジミール・ラドマノビッチVladimir Radmanovic	F	29	8	0	16.6	1.8	5.3	33.3	0.9	2.5	35.0	0.9	2.8	31.8	0.5	0.8	66.7	1.0	2.6	3.6	0.9	0.4	0.1	0.6	2.3	4.9
#21	アレクシス・アジンサAlexis Ajinca	C	21	6	0	5.0	0.8	1.7	50.0	0.8	1.7	50.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.2	0.0	0.2	0.5	0.7	0.0	0.2	0.2	0.3	0.8	1.7
#19	ラジャ・ベルRaja Bell	—	33	5	5	31.4	4.8	11.0	43.6	3.0	6.2	48.4	1.8	4.8	37.5	0.6	0.6	100.0	1.0	3.2	4.2	2.0	0.8	0.4	1.0	2.6	12.0

Points per game: 95.3 #28
Points allowed per game: 93.8 #1
Offensive rating: 103.9 #24
Defensive rating: 102.0 #2
Net rating: +1.9 #15
eFG%: 49.0% #24
Turnover rate: 17.2% #30
Pace: 90.9 #26
Rebounds per game: 40.8 #22
Assists per game: 20.2 #22
Steals per game: 7.7 #8
Blocks per game: 5.4 #7

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: −2.7All-time 721/892
Defense: +4.6All-time 67/892
Diff: +1.9All-time 340/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off24/30E

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def12/30C

Off30/30G

BallKeep it / Take it

Def3/30A

Off8/30B

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def14/30C

Off2/30A

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def2/30A

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	49.0%	24/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	49.1%	12/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	17.2%	30/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	16.7%	3/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	31.5%	8/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	30.2%	14/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	34.6%	2/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	26.2%	2/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

Playoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	CHA	44	38	.537	9	Lost in the play-in	13	7	8	12	24	5	15	29	20
2024-25	CHA	19	63	.232	14	—	29	16	27	30	25	9	26	26	20
2023-24	CHA	21	61	.256	13	—	28	22	30	26	18	30	25	24	25
2022-23	CHA	27	55	.329	14	—	27	22	27	29	17	9	17	8	6
2021-22	CHA	43	39	.524	10	Lost in the play-in	4	25	16	7	10	12	1	5	10
2020-21	CHA	33	39	.458	10	Lost in the play-in	22	12	23	19	24	19	5	10	16
2019-20	CHA	23	42	.354	10	—	30	12	27	28	13	24	19	26	25
2018-19	CHA	39	43	.476	9	—	19	17	18	22	2	23	24	21	18
2017-18	CHA	36	46	.439	10	—	10	19	17	25	3	3	24	28	18
2016-17	CHA	36	46	.439	11	—	16	13	15	23	1	15	11	25	14
2015-16	CHA	48	34	.585	6	Lost in round 1	11	9	9	15	1	14	19	22	12
2014-15	CHA	33	49	.402	11	—	28	6	23	30	1	10	27	30	6
2013-14	CHA	43	39	.524	7	Lost in round 1	23	4	16	25	1	15	16	29	8
2012-13	CHA	21	61	.256	14	—	26	29	30	30	8	27	29	22	6
2011-12	CHA	7	59	.106	15	—	30	27	30	30	14	29	18	29	5
2010-11	CHA	34	48	.415	10	—	29	11	24	25	21	24	17	28	8
2009-10	CHA	44	38	.537	7	Lost in round 1	28	1	15	24	28	22	22	8	7
2008-09	CHA	35	47	.427	10	—	30	9	20	19	27	26	10	19	14
2007-08	CHA	32	50	.390	12	—	19	20	22	16	20	26	16	12	10
2006-07	CHA	33	49	.402	11	—	18	21	26	26	13	23	8	4	19
2005-06	CHA	26	56	.317	13	—	18	24	27	30	14	24	10	1	19
2004-05	CHA	18	64	.220	14	—	22	20	28	29	18	19	10	5	11
2001-02	CHA	44	38	.537	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	20	7	13	20	9	6	18	12	10
2000-01	CHA	46	36	.561	6	Lost in the conf semifinals	24	4	14	25	8	7	6	11	11
1999-00	CHA	49	33	.598	4	Lost in round 1	14	10	9	19	9	16	4	6	7
1998-99	CHA	26	24	.520	9	—	11	18	16	6	19	25	5	6	16
1997-98	CHA	51	31	.622	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	10	14	12	7	12	21	8	11	26
1996-97	CHA	54	28	.659	5	Lost in round 1	12	14	12	3	5	26	4	26	21
1995-96	CHA	41	41	.500	9	—	8	24	17	8	10	24	11	24	29
1994-95	CHA	50	32	.610	4	Lost in round 1	15	6	9	6	4	24	5	22	13
1993-94	CHA	41	41	.500	9	—	4	24	17	6	10	15	2	13	18
1992-93	CHA	44	38	.537	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	24	15	9	15	10	4	21	8
1991-92	CHA	31	51	.378	11	—	6	26	20	14	14	16	2	3	27
1990-91	CHA	26	56	.317	11	—	20	22	24	18	10	27	15	7	26
1989-90	CHA	19	63	.232	14	—	25	21	24	23	5	27	11	7	27
1988-89	CHA	20	62	.244	12	—	22	21	23	23	8	25	1	17	25

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

CHA シャーロット・ボブキャッツCharlotte Bobcats 2009-10

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2009-10 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

CHA シャーロット・ボブキャッツCharlotte Bobcats 2009-10

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2009-10 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary