CHA シャーロット・ボブキャッツCharlotte Bobcats 2010-11

Record: 34W48L
Conference: East 10
Playoffs: Missed the playoffs
League: 22

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2010-11 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

14141299822

Points

12151610919

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#32	ボリス・ディアウBoris Diaw	F	28	82	82	33.9	4.6	9.4	49.2	3.7	6.7	55.3	1.0	2.8	34.5	1.0	1.5	68.3	1.3	3.8	5.0	4.1	0.9	0.6	2.0	2.3	11.3
#14	DJ・オーガスティンD.J. Augustin	G	23	82	82	33.6	4.9	11.7	41.6	3.5	7.6	46.1	1.4	4.1	33.3	3.3	3.6	90.6	0.5	2.3	2.7	6.1	0.7	0.0	1.9	1.9	14.4
#2	ショーン・リビングストンShaun Livingston	G	25	73	0	17.3	2.5	5.4	46.6	2.5	5.4	46.8	0.0	0.1	25.0	1.5	1.7	86.4	0.4	1.6	2.0	2.2	0.6	0.4	1.2	1.5	6.6
#15	ジェラルド・ヘンダーソンJr.Gerald Henderson	G	23	68	30	24.4	3.8	8.4	45.4	3.7	7.9	47.2	0.1	0.5	19.4	1.9	2.4	78.5	0.7	2.3	3.0	1.5	0.7	0.5	0.9	1.7	9.6
#1	スティーブン・ジャクソンStephen Jackson	G	32	67	67	35.9	6.5	15.8	41.1	4.7	10.4	44.9	1.8	5.4	33.7	3.7	4.6	81.6	0.8	3.7	4.5	3.6	1.2	0.4	3.1	2.4	18.5
#54	クワミ・ブラウンKwame Brown	C	28	66	50	26.0	2.9	5.7	51.7	2.9	5.7	51.7	0.0	0.0	—	2.1	3.5	58.9	2.2	4.6	6.8	0.7	0.4	0.6	1.0	2.6	7.9
#33	マット・キャロルMatt Carroll	G	30	54	1	10.8	1.6	3.7	44.7	1.3	2.8	47.1	0.3	0.9	37.0	0.7	1.0	76.9	0.2	1.0	1.3	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.4	0.8	4.4
#5	ドミニク・マグワイアDominic McGuire	F	25	52	8	14.6	1.4	3.5	39.6	1.4	3.5	40.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.6	0.8	76.9	1.2	2.6	3.8	0.8	0.2	0.6	0.5	1.8	3.3
#13	ナジー・モハメドNazr Mohammed	C	33	51	30	16.7	3.1	6.2	50.2	3.1	6.2	50.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	1.7	59.1	1.8	3.1	4.9	0.3	0.3	0.9	1.0	2.4	7.3
#3	ジェラルド・ウォレスGerald Wallace	F	28	48	48	39.0	5.3	12.1	43.3	4.5	9.9	45.6	0.7	2.2	33.0	4.4	5.9	73.9	1.5	6.7	8.2	2.4	1.2	1.0	2.1	2.5	15.6
#12	タイラス・トーマスTyrus Thomas	F	24	41	2	21.0	3.8	8.1	47.1	3.8	8.0	47.6	0.0	0.1	0.0	2.6	3.3	78.7	1.6	3.9	5.5	0.7	0.7	1.6	1.6	2.8	10.2
#4	デリック・ブラウンDerrick Brown	F	23	41	1	11.9	1.5	2.8	54.9	1.5	2.6	56.1	0.0	0.1	33.3	0.6	1.1	53.2	0.8	1.3	2.0	0.7	0.4	0.2	0.7	1.2	3.7
#21	エドアルド・ナヘラEduardo Najera	F	34	31	0	12.0	0.8	2.3	36.1	0.5	1.2	39.5	0.4	1.1	32.4	0.2	0.4	54.5	0.5	1.0	1.4	0.6	0.4	0.2	0.4	1.7	2.2
#8	DJ・ホワイトDJ White	F	24	24	0	19.4	3.4	6.4	52.6	3.4	6.3	53.3	0.0	0.1	0.0	1.7	2.3	75.9	1.3	3.1	4.4	0.6	0.3	0.5	0.3	1.9	8.5
#44	ダンテ・カニンガムDante Cunningham	F	23	22	9	24.0	4.2	8.2	50.8	4.1	7.8	52.9	0.0	0.4	11.1	0.6	0.8	76.5	1.0	3.0	4.0	0.6	0.7	0.5	0.8	1.7	9.0
#7	サガナ・ジョップDeSagana Diop	C	29	16	0	11.3	0.5	1.5	33.3	0.5	1.5	33.3	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.7	36.4	0.8	1.8	2.5	0.4	0.3	0.9	0.7	1.6	1.3
#41	ギャレット・テンプルGarrett Temple	G	24	12	0	10.5	1.0	3.5	28.6	0.4	1.3	31.3	0.6	2.2	26.9	0.6	0.9	63.6	0.0	1.3	1.3	2.0	0.8	0.3	1.7	1.2	3.2
#10	ジョエル・プリジビラJoel Przybilla	C	31	5	0	14.8	0.8	2.0	40.0	0.8	2.0	40.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.2	0.8	25.0	1.8	3.0	4.8	0.0	0.0	0.2	1.4	3.2	1.8

Points per game: 93.3 #29
Points allowed per game: 97.3 #11
Offensive rating: 102.8 #26
Defensive rating: 107.0 #17
Net rating: -4.2 #24
eFG%: 48.2% #25
Turnover rate: 16.0% #24
Pace: 90.3 #26
Rebounds per game: 40.1 #24
Assists per game: 21.1 #18
Steals per game: 6.4 #28
Blocks per game: 5.3 #8

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: −3.5All-time 776/892
Defense: −0.7All-time 522/892
Diff: −4.2All-time 713/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off25/30E

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def16/30D

Off26/30E

BallKeep it / Take it

Def23/30E

Off17/30D

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def12/30C

Off6/30B

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def10/30C

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	48.2%	25/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	50.0%	16/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	16.0%	26/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	14.5%	23/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	29.8%	17/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	29.5%	12/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	31.4%	6/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	29.4%	10/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

Playoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	CHA	44	38	.537	9	Lost in the play-in	13	7	8	12	24	5	15	29	20
2024-25	CHA	19	63	.232	14	—	29	16	27	30	25	9	26	26	20
2023-24	CHA	21	61	.256	13	—	28	22	30	26	18	30	25	24	25
2022-23	CHA	27	55	.329	14	—	27	22	27	29	17	9	17	8	6
2021-22	CHA	43	39	.524	10	Lost in the play-in	4	25	16	7	10	12	1	5	10
2020-21	CHA	33	39	.458	10	Lost in the play-in	22	12	23	19	24	19	5	10	16
2019-20	CHA	23	42	.354	10	—	30	12	27	28	13	24	19	26	25
2018-19	CHA	39	43	.476	9	—	19	17	18	22	2	23	24	21	18
2017-18	CHA	36	46	.439	10	—	10	19	17	25	3	3	24	28	18
2016-17	CHA	36	46	.439	11	—	16	13	15	23	1	15	11	25	14
2015-16	CHA	48	34	.585	6	Lost in round 1	11	9	9	15	1	14	19	22	12
2014-15	CHA	33	49	.402	11	—	28	6	23	30	1	10	27	30	6
2013-14	CHA	43	39	.524	7	Lost in round 1	23	4	16	25	1	15	16	29	8
2012-13	CHA	21	61	.256	14	—	26	29	30	30	8	27	29	22	6
2011-12	CHA	7	59	.106	15	—	30	27	30	30	14	29	18	29	5
2010-11	CHA	34	48	.415	10	—	29	11	24	25	21	24	17	28	8
2009-10	CHA	44	38	.537	7	Lost in round 1	28	1	15	24	28	22	22	8	7
2008-09	CHA	35	47	.427	10	—	30	9	20	19	27	26	10	19	14
2007-08	CHA	32	50	.390	12	—	19	20	22	16	20	26	16	12	10
2006-07	CHA	33	49	.402	11	—	18	21	26	26	13	23	8	4	19
2005-06	CHA	26	56	.317	13	—	18	24	27	30	14	24	10	1	19
2004-05	CHA	18	64	.220	14	—	22	20	28	29	18	19	10	5	11
2001-02	CHA	44	38	.537	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	20	7	13	20	9	6	18	12	10
2000-01	CHA	46	36	.561	6	Lost in the conf semifinals	24	4	14	25	8	7	6	11	11
1999-00	CHA	49	33	.598	4	Lost in round 1	14	10	9	19	9	16	4	6	7
1998-99	CHA	26	24	.520	9	—	11	18	16	6	19	25	5	6	16
1997-98	CHA	51	31	.622	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	10	14	12	7	12	21	8	11	26
1996-97	CHA	54	28	.659	5	Lost in round 1	12	14	12	3	5	26	4	26	21
1995-96	CHA	41	41	.500	9	—	8	24	17	8	10	24	11	24	29
1994-95	CHA	50	32	.610	4	Lost in round 1	15	6	9	6	4	24	5	22	13
1993-94	CHA	41	41	.500	9	—	4	24	17	6	10	15	2	13	18
1992-93	CHA	44	38	.537	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	24	15	9	15	10	4	21	8
1991-92	CHA	31	51	.378	11	—	6	26	20	14	14	16	2	3	27
1990-91	CHA	26	56	.317	11	—	20	22	24	18	10	27	15	7	26
1989-90	CHA	19	63	.232	14	—	25	21	24	23	5	27	11	7	27
1988-89	CHA	20	62	.244	12	—	22	21	23	23	8	25	1	17	25

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

CHA シャーロット・ボブキャッツCharlotte Bobcats 2010-11

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2010-11 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

CHA シャーロット・ボブキャッツCharlotte Bobcats 2010-11

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2010-11 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary