LAC ロサンゼルス・クリッパーズLos Angeles Clippers 2000-01

Record: 31W51L
Conference: West 12
Playoffs: Missed the playoffs
League: 22

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2000-01 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

141411111118

Points

1714111099815

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#34	マイケル・オロウォカンディMichael Olowokandi	C	25	82	82	25.9	3.8	8.6	43.5	3.8	8.6	43.5	0.0	0.0	—	1.0	1.9	54.5	2.0	4.4	6.4	0.6	0.4	1.3	2.1	3.0	8.5
#45	ショーン・ルークスSean Rooks	C	31	82	0	18.9	2.1	4.8	42.8	2.0	4.8	42.7	0.0	0.0	50.0	1.3	1.7	74.8	1.1	2.6	3.7	0.9	0.4	0.8	0.9	2.4	5.4
#5	ジェフ・マクイニスJeff McInnis	G	26	81	81	35.0	5.3	11.5	46.3	4.7	9.7	48.2	0.6	1.8	36.1	1.6	2.0	80.7	0.5	2.2	2.7	5.5	0.9	0.1	1.4	2.5	12.9
#52	エリック・パイカウスキーEric Piatkowski	G/F	30	81	40	26.5	3.6	8.3	43.3	2.1	4.6	45.6	1.5	3.7	40.4	2.0	2.2	87.3	0.7	2.3	3.0	1.2	0.6	0.2	0.9	1.5	10.6
#21	ダリアス・マイルズDarius Miles	F/G	19	81	21	26.3	3.9	7.8	50.5	3.9	7.5	51.9	0.0	0.2	5.3	1.5	2.9	52.1	1.6	4.3	5.9	1.2	0.6	1.5	1.8	2.4	9.4
#7	ラマー・オドムLamar Odom	F	21	76	74	37.3	6.3	13.8	46.0	5.3	10.4	50.6	1.1	3.3	31.6	3.4	5.1	67.9	1.4	6.3	7.8	5.2	1.0	1.6	3.5	3.1	17.2
#3	クエンティン・リチャードソンQuentin Richardson	G	20	76	28	17.9	3.1	6.9	44.2	2.4	4.9	48.7	0.7	2.0	33.1	1.3	2.1	62.7	1.4	2.0	3.4	0.8	0.6	0.1	0.8	1.3	8.1
#1	キーオン・ドゥーリングKeyon Dooling	G	20	76	1	16.3	1.9	4.8	40.9	1.6	3.7	42.6	0.4	1.1	35.0	1.6	2.4	69.8	0.1	1.1	1.2	2.3	0.5	0.1	1.2	1.4	5.9
#50	コーリー・マゲッティCorey Maggette	—	21	69	9	19.7	3.3	7.1	46.2	3.0	6.2	48.3	0.2	0.8	30.4	3.2	4.2	77.4	1.3	2.9	4.2	1.2	0.5	0.1	1.5	2.0	10.0
#44	チェロキー・パークスCherokee Parks	F/C	28	52	31	16.8	2.2	4.5	49.2	2.2	4.4	50.4	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.4	0.5	70.4	1.1	2.5	3.6	0.8	0.4	0.5	0.6	2.0	4.8
#32	ブライアン・スキナーBrian Skinner	F/C	24	39	23	15.0	1.6	4.1	39.8	1.6	4.1	39.8	0.0	0.0	—	0.8	1.5	54.2	1.4	2.9	4.3	0.5	0.4	0.3	0.8	1.6	4.1
#30	デレック・ストロングDerek Strong	F	32	28	8	17.5	1.6	4.2	38.5	1.6	4.1	38.8	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	1.3	75.7	1.2	2.6	3.9	0.3	0.5	0.0	0.8	1.1	4.2
#8	タイロン・ネスビーTyrone Nesby	F/G	25	14	12	23.8	2.9	8.8	32.5	2.1	5.5	39.0	0.7	3.3	21.7	1.3	1.6	78.3	1.1	1.9	3.0	0.8	0.7	0.3	0.7	2.0	7.7
#11	アール・ボイキンスEarl Boykins	—	24	10	0	14.9	2.5	6.3	39.7	2.4	5.5	43.6	0.1	0.8	12.5	1.4	1.7	82.4	0.4	0.7	1.1	3.2	0.5	0.0	0.9	0.9	6.5
#25	ゼンドン・ハミルトンZendon Hamilton	F/C	25	3	0	6.3	0.7	3.0	22.2	0.7	3.0	22.2	0.0	0.0	—	1.7	2.7	62.5	1.0	1.7	2.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.7	1.3	3.0
#33	キース・クロッスKeith Closs	C	24	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Points per game: 92.5 #21
Points allowed per game: 95.3 #11
Offensive rating: 100.3 #15
Defensive rating: 103.2 #20
Net rating: -2.9 #22
eFG%: 47.6% #11
Turnover rate: 17.1% #24
Pace: 90.7 #25
Rebounds per game: 42.9 #10
Assists per game: 19.3 #27
Steals per game: 6.0 #29
Blocks per game: 6.3 #4

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: −1.3All-time 590/892
Defense: −1.7All-time 627/892
Diff: −2.9All-time 648/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off11/29C

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def10/29C

Off24/29E

BallKeep it / Take it

Def29/29G

Off10/29C

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def19/29D

Off11/29C

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def9/29C

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	47.6%	11/29	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	46.6%	10/29
Ball	Ball security	Lost	17.1%	24/29	Forcing turnovers	Taken	13.8%	29/29
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	32.2%	10/29	Defensive boards	Allowed	31.8%	19/29
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	31.9%	11/29	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	29.2%	9/29

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

Playoff lineLost above the line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	LAC	42	40	.512	9	Lost in the play-in	24	10	16	7	13	29	30	7	14
2024-25	LAC	50	32	.610	5	Lost in round 1	20	4	6	11	21	17	22	3	20
2023-24	LAC	51	31	.622	4	Lost in round 1	12	10	7	8	12	19	20	7	15
2022-23	LAC	44	38	.537	5	Lost in round 1	17	12	17	11	17	16	23	15	21
2021-22	LAC	42	40	.512	8	Lost in the play-in	23	11	18	19	14	18	16	15	8
2020-21	LAC	47	25	.653	4	Lost in the conf finals	10	4	2	3	7	16	16	20	28
2019-20	LAC	49	23	.681	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	4	13	2	8	13	3	22	24	17
2018-19	LAC	48	34	.585	8	Lost in round 1	5	25	13	12	22	13	18	23	21
2017-18	LAC	42	40	.512	10	—	9	24	18	9	19	15	22	13	18
2016-17	LAC	51	31	.622	4	Lost in round 1	6	12	4	4	7	21	15	18	21
2015-16	LAC	53	29	.646	4	Lost in round 1	7	7	6	5	3	25	11	7	10
2014-15	LAC	56	26	.683	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	16	2	2	2	20	3	13	9
2013-14	LAC	57	25	.695	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	1	14	2	5	7	13	3	4	12
2012-13	LAC	56	26	.683	4	Lost in round 1	8	4	3	4	13	17	4	1	7
2011-12	LAC	40	26	.606	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	14	13	10	7	2	21	13	6	20
2010-11	LAC	32	50	.390	13	—	19	20	22	16	29	9	10	19	13
2009-10	LAC	29	53	.354	12	—	27	19	28	21	28	14	9	23	3
2008-09	LAC	19	63	.232	14	—	27	25	30	28	23	24	14	20	3
2007-08	LAC	23	59	.280	12	—	29	18	28	30	14	27	18	20	10
2006-07	LAC	40	42	.488	9	—	23	9	14	25	14	13	14	10	1
2005-06	LAC	47	35	.573	6	Lost in the conf semifinals	16	11	11	18	15	1	14	24	1
2004-05	LAC	37	45	.451	10	—	19	12	18	17	24	17	5	18	14
2003-04	LAC	28	54	.341	14	—	9	27	25	26	25	4	21	21	21
2002-03	LAC	27	55	.329	13	—	20	22	24	21	22	15	25	27	10
2001-02	LAC	39	43	.476	9	—	15	17	18	13	21	7	22	29	2
2000-01	LAC	31	51	.378	12	—	20	11	22	12	21	10	27	29	3
1999-00	LAC	15	67	.183	14	—	28	28	29	26	22	27	29	25	6
1998-99	LAC	9	41	.180	13	—	19	27	28	21	19	27	28	13	17
1997-98	LAC	17	65	.207	13	—	13	27	26	15	20	22	28	24	8
1996-97	LAC	36	46	.439	8	Lost in round 1	14	22	19	21	18	16	24	5	7
1995-96	LAC	29	53	.354	11	—	15	21	22	11	21	26	26	7	15
1994-95	LAC	17	65	.207	13	—	23	23	27	25	19	26	19	3	10
1993-94	LAC	27	55	.329	11	—	9	27	20	14	26	14	5	3	15
1992-93	LAC	41	41	.500	7	Lost in round 1	10	19	14	15	16	13	2	3	7
1991-92	LAC	45	37	.549	7	Lost in round 1	17	6	13	16	14	17	13	3	8
1990-91	LAC	31	51	.378	9	—	17	18	18	21	25	6	10	11	6
1989-90	LAC	30	52	.366	11	—	20	16	21	14	26	20	19	7	3
1988-89	LAC	21	61	.256	11	—	18	23	24	19	23	17	8	8	4
1987-88	LAC	17	65	.207	12	—	23	16	23	23	23	12	21	10	4
1986-87	LAC	12	70	.146	12	—	21	22	23	22	17	22	19	6	10
1985-86	LAC	32	50	.390	9	—	16	22	23	20	15	21	21	15	5
1984-85	LAC	31	51	.378	9	—	19	16	19	9	20	11	22	23	6
1983-84	SDC	30	52	.366	11	—	9	21	19	11	15	4	20	22	14
1982-83	SDC	25	57	.305	11	—	13	20	19	19	17	21	14	4	14
1981-82	SDC	17	65	.207	12	—	10	21	22	—	19	23	20	17	23
1980-81	SDC	36	46	.439	9	—	16	16	16	—	2	20	9	9	22
1979-80	SDC	35	47	.427	7	—	16	16	18	—	4	17	22	20	22
1978-79	SDC	43	39	.524	7	—	6	22	15	—	12	6	22	14	15
1977-78	BUF	27	55	.329	10	—	17	11	20	—	5	20	14	21	18
1976-77	BUF	30	52	.366	10	—	14	19	21	—	13	12	17	17	14
1975-76	BUF	46	36	.561	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	15	5	—	16	15	2	10	7
1974-75	BUF	49	33	.598	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	15	5	—	12	9	6	8	1
1973-74	BUF	42	40	.512	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	1	17	9	—	16	7	5	5	2
1972-73	BUF	21	61	.256	7	—	16	14	16	—	—	—	4	—	—
1971-72	BUF	22	60	.268	8	—	17	11	16	—	—	—	16	—	—
1970-71	BUF	22	60	.268	7	—	16	8	16	—	—	—	10	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

LAC ロサンゼルス・クリッパーズLos Angeles Clippers 2000-01

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2000-01 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

LAC ロサンゼルス・クリッパーズLos Angeles Clippers 2000-01

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2000-01 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary