CLE クリーブランド・キャバリアーズCleveland Cavaliers 2004-05

Record: 42W40L
Conference: East 9
Playoffs: Missed the playoffs
League: 17

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2004-05 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

171313139913

Points

2712171510

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#90	ドリュー・グッデンDrew Gooden	F	23	82	80	30.8	5.7	11.5	49.2	5.6	11.2	50.2	0.1	0.3	17.9	3.1	3.8	81.0	2.5	6.7	9.2	1.6	0.9	0.9	1.6	2.8	14.4
#20	エリック・スノウEric Snow	G	31	81	15	22.7	1.5	4.0	38.2	1.4	3.5	39.7	0.2	0.6	28.9	0.7	1.0	73.8	0.5	1.5	1.9	3.9	0.8	0.2	1.1	2.3	4.0
#23	レブロン・ジェームズLeBron James	F	20	80	80	42.4	9.9	21.1	47.2	8.6	17.2	49.9	1.4	3.9	35.1	6.0	8.0	75.0	1.4	6.0	7.4	7.2	2.2	0.7	3.3	1.8	27.2
#11	ジードルナス・イルガスカスZydrunas Ilgauskas	C	29	78	78	33.5	5.9	12.6	46.8	5.8	12.5	46.9	0.0	0.1	28.6	5.2	6.4	79.9	3.8	4.8	8.6	1.3	0.7	2.1	2.4	4.0	16.9
#0	ジェフ・マクイニスJeff McInnis	G	30	76	69	34.9	5.0	12.0	41.2	3.8	8.6	43.9	1.2	3.5	34.5	1.7	2.1	81.3	0.4	1.6	2.1	5.1	0.7	0.0	1.5	2.3	12.8
#14	アイラ・ニューブルIra Newble	F/G	30	74	69	24.8	2.5	5.7	42.9	2.2	5.0	43.9	0.3	0.7	35.8	0.7	0.9	79.7	1.1	1.9	3.0	1.2	0.7	0.2	0.8	1.9	5.9
#32	ロバート・トレイラーRobert Traylor	F/C	28	74	6	17.9	2.4	5.4	44.4	2.4	5.3	45.3	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.7	1.4	53.9	1.8	2.6	4.5	0.8	0.7	0.7	1.0	2.9	5.5
#12	ルーシャス・ハリスLucious Harris	—	34	73	4	15.4	1.6	4.1	39.5	1.3	3.2	41.5	0.3	0.9	32.3	0.8	0.9	81.2	0.5	1.1	1.7	0.7	0.4	0.1	0.4	0.9	4.3
#3	アレクサンダル・パブロビッチSasha Pavlovic	F	21	65	9	13.3	1.8	4.2	43.5	1.4	3.0	45.5	0.5	1.2	38.5	0.7	1.0	68.8	0.2	0.9	1.1	0.8	0.4	0.1	0.7	1.9	4.8
#17	アンダーソン・バレジャオAnderson Varejao	F	22	54	0	16.0	1.8	3.6	51.3	1.8	3.5	51.8	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.3	2.4	53.5	2.0	2.7	4.8	0.5	0.8	0.7	0.5	2.3	4.9
#52	サガナ・ジョップDeSagana Diop	C	23	39	0	7.8	0.5	1.8	29.0	0.5	1.7	29.9	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.8	1.0	1.8	0.4	0.2	0.7	0.3	1.4	1.0
#47	スコット・ウィリアムズScott Williams	—	36	19	0	8.0	0.6	2.2	29.3	0.6	2.1	30.0	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.5	0.6	81.8	0.8	0.8	1.6	0.4	0.2	0.3	0.3	1.6	1.7
#44	イジー・ウェルシュJiri Welsch	F	25	16	0	12.0	0.8	3.2	23.5	0.6	2.5	25.0	0.1	0.7	18.2	1.3	1.8	71.4	0.4	1.4	1.8	1.2	0.3	0.0	0.9	1.0	2.9
#2	デュワン・ワグナーDajuan Wagner	—	21	11	0	9.3	1.6	5.0	32.7	1.2	2.6	44.8	0.5	2.4	19.2	0.3	0.4	75.0	0.0	0.2	0.2	1.2	0.5	0.0	0.8	1.4	4.0
#33	ルーク・ジャクソンLuke Jackson	—	23	10	0	4.3	1.0	2.7	37.0	0.6	2.1	28.6	0.4	0.6	66.7	0.5	0.6	83.3	0.2	0.4	0.6	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.2	0.4	2.9
#6	ジェローム・モイソJerome Moiso	—	26	4	0	6.8	0.8	1.3	60.0	0.8	1.3	60.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	1.5	1.8	0.3	0.3	0.5	0.0	1.0	1.5

Points per game: 96.5 #17
Points allowed per game: 95.7 #11
Offensive rating: 105.3 #12
Defensive rating: 104.7 #13
Net rating: +0.6 #15
eFG%: 47.0% #25
Turnover rate: 15.2% #12
Pace: 90.7 #19
Rebounds per game: 42.3 #14
Assists per game: 22.6 #6
Steals per game: 8.0 #9
Blocks per game: 5.6 #7

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: +0.8All-time 346/892
Defense: −0.2All-time 457/892
Diff: +0.6All-time 425/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off25/30E

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def17/30D

Off12/30C

BallKeep it / Take it

Def11/30C

Off2/30A

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def22/30D

Off15/30C

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def16/30D

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	47.0%	25/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	48.5%	17/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	15.2%	12/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	16.2%	11/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	35.4%	2/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	32.6%	22/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	32.5%	15/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	33.1%	16/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionFinalsPlayoff lineLost above the line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	CLE	52	30	.634	4	Lost in the conf finals	4	15	9	5	9	11	8	14	11
2024-25	CLE	64	18	.780	1	Lost in the conf semifinals	1	12	2	1	3	5	9	12	26
2023-24	CLE	48	34	.585	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	20	7	13	13	17	16	8	18	21
2022-23	CLE	51	31	.622	4	Lost in round 1	25	1	2	9	6	25	19	15	13
2021-22	CLE	44	38	.537	8	Lost in the play-in	25	5	13	14	22	15	11	23	23
2020-21	CLE	22	50	.306	13	—	30	16	28	29	29	24	21	10	20
2019-20	CLE	19	46	.292	15	—	26	22	28	22	30	19	24	25	30
2018-19	CLE	19	63	.232	14	—	29	24	30	29	9	26	29	28	30
2017-18	CLE	50	32	.610	4	Lost in the Finals	5	26	14	3	9	23	11	24	28
2016-17	CLE	51	31	.622	2	Lost in the Finals	4	20	7	2	14	12	13	30	25
2015-16	CLE	57	25	.695	1	Champion	8	4	4	3	10	9	13	27	26
2014-15	CLE	53	29	.646	2	Lost in the Finals	8	13	5	4	17	18	10	19	25
2013-14	CLE	33	49	.402	10	—	22	15	23	27	10	10	20	23	29
2012-13	CLE	24	58	.293	13	—	18	25	26	26	5	22	26	16	29
2011-12	CLE	21	45	.318	13	—	25	26	29	29	25	14	23	22	29
2010-11	CLE	19	63	.232	15	—	25	23	30	28	17	21	19	25	27
2009-10	CLE	61	21	.744	1	Lost in the conf semifinals	9	5	2	3	11	11	5	21	10
2008-09	CLE	66	16	.805	1	Lost in the conf finals	13	1	1	4	5	7	19	15	7
2007-08	CLE	45	37	.549	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	24	9	16	26	10	1	24	17	6
2006-07	CLE	50	32	.610	2	Lost in the Finals	19	5	7	22	7	2	15	8	20
2005-06	CLE	50	32	.610	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	15	10	8	12	9	4	24	18	15
2004-05	CLE	42	40	.512	9	—	17	11	14	24	13	14	6	9	7
2003-04	CLE	35	47	.427	9	—	14	17	22	28	13	1	8	23	3
2002-03	CLE	17	65	.207	15	—	25	28	29	27	28	2	18	15	2
2001-02	CLE	29	53	.354	14	—	16	26	22	11	18	16	7	23	9
2000-01	CLE	30	52	.366	11	—	22	17	23	23	27	17	19	15	13
1999-00	CLE	32	50	.390	11	—	18	22	24	22	26	17	6	9	23
1998-99	CLE	22	28	.440	11	—	26	9	20	16	17	29	7	5	23
1997-98	CLE	47	35	.573	6	Lost in round 1	23	4	10	13	29	23	10	2	14
1996-97	CLE	42	40	.512	9	—	29	1	11	15	4	29	19	15	27
1995-96	CLE	47	35	.573	4	Lost in round 1	28	1	8	10	1	29	17	9	23
1994-95	CLE	43	39	.524	6	Lost in round 1	27	1	14	24	2	21	26	21	23
1993-94	CLE	47	35	.573	5	Lost in round 1	12	7	8	12	1	18	14	15	14
1992-93	CLE	54	28	.659	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	8	4	3	2	2	22	1	22	4
1991-92	CLE	57	25	.695	4	Lost in the conf finals	7	10	5	5	1	21	4	24	1
1990-91	CLE	33	49	.402	9	—	22	11	17	15	9	23	2	20	9
1989-90	CLE	42	40	.512	7	Lost in round 1	21	6	17	19	10	16	9	21	3
1988-89	CLE	57	25	.695	3	Lost in round 1	12	3	2	2	8	19	5	10	2
1987-88	CLE	42	40	.512	5	Lost in round 1	21	2	12	4	17	23	12	7	3
1986-87	CLE	31	51	.378	9	—	22	11	19	20	22	6	22	18	3
1985-86	CLE	29	53	.354	9	—	19	11	16	14	9	13	15	19	8
1984-85	CLE	36	46	.439	8	Lost in round 1	16	15	18	21	6	6	15	19	9
1983-84	CLE	28	54	.341	9	—	22	7	21	23	3	7	21	18	17
1982-83	CLE	23	59	.280	10	—	23	8	22	22	10	15	23	21	23
1981-82	CLE	15	67	.183	11	—	21	19	23	—	2	21	21	19	19
1980-81	CLE	28	54	.341	9	—	17	20	19	—	1	15	16	20	19
1979-80	CLE	37	45	.451	8	—	3	19	9	—	1	10	13	15	17
1978-79	CLE	30	52	.366	8	—	20	10	18	—	1	21	21	16	18
1977-78	CLE	43	39	.524	4	Lost in round 1	19	3	9	—	2	11	22	16	7
1976-77	CLE	43	39	.524	6	Lost in round 1	20	2	7	—	1	11	20	21	5
1975-76	CLE	49	33	.598	2	Lost in the conf finals	17	2	2	—	1	10	10	15	6
1974-75	CLE	40	42	.488	5	—	16	3	10	—	2	17	11	16	11
1973-74	CLE	29	53	.354	7	—	17	6	15	—	2	13	8	15	14
1972-73	CLE	32	50	.390	6	—	17	7	12	—	—	—	7	—	—
1971-72	CLE	23	59	.280	7	—	16	14	15	—	—	—	6	—	—
1970-71	CLE	15	67	.183	8	—	17	10	17	—	—	—	5	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

CLE クリーブランド・キャバリアーズCleveland Cavaliers 2004-05

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2004-05 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

CLE クリーブランド・キャバリアーズCleveland Cavaliers 2004-05

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2004-05 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary