UTA ユタ・ジャズUtah Jazz 2009-10

Record: 53W29L
Conference: West 5
Playoffs: Lost in the conf semifinals
League: 6

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2009-10 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 14-2vs DEN#4
1. @−13
2. @+3
3. +12
4. +11
5. @−14
6. +8
Conf semifinals0-4vs LAL#1
1. @−5
2. @−8
3. −1
4. −15

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

14141211109815

Points

171811129813

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#24	ポール・ミルサップPaul Millsap	F/C	24	82	8	27.8	4.7	8.7	53.8	4.7	8.6	54.3	0.0	0.1	11.1	2.2	3.2	69.3	2.3	4.5	6.8	1.6	0.8	1.2	1.4	3.5	11.6
#23	ウェズリー・マシューズWesley Matthews	G	23	82	48	24.7	3.3	6.9	48.3	2.6	4.9	52.5	0.8	2.0	38.2	2.0	2.4	82.9	0.6	1.7	2.3	1.5	0.8	0.2	1.1	1.9	9.4
#5	カルロス・ブーザーCarlos Boozer	F	28	78	78	34.3	7.9	14.1	56.2	7.9	14.1	56.2	0.0	0.0	—	3.7	4.9	74.2	2.3	8.9	11.2	3.2	1.1	0.5	2.7	3.5	19.5
#8	デロン・ウィリアムズDeron Williams	G	25	76	76	36.9	6.5	13.9	46.9	5.2	10.4	50.1	1.3	3.4	37.1	4.4	5.5	80.1	0.7	3.3	4.0	10.5	1.3	0.2	3.3	2.7	18.7
#13	メメット・オカーMehmet Okur	C	30	73	73	29.4	4.9	10.6	45.8	3.7	7.7	48.6	1.1	2.9	38.5	2.7	3.3	82.0	1.8	5.2	7.1	1.6	0.5	1.1	1.7	3.1	13.5
#34	CJ・マイルズCJ Miles	F	22	63	28	23.8	3.8	8.9	42.9	2.7	5.5	48.4	1.2	3.4	34.1	1.0	1.5	69.5	0.7	2.0	2.7	1.7	0.9	0.3	1.3	3.0	9.9
#17	ロニー・プライスRonnie Price	G	26	60	4	13.4	1.6	4.0	40.5	1.3	3.0	44.7	0.3	1.1	28.6	0.7	1.0	69.5	0.5	0.8	1.2	2.1	0.7	0.2	0.9	1.8	4.3
#47	アンドレイ・キリレンコAndrei Kirilenko	F	28	58	35	29.0	4.2	8.3	50.6	3.8	6.8	55.5	0.4	1.5	29.2	3.0	4.0	74.4	1.3	3.2	4.6	2.7	1.4	1.2	1.4	1.8	11.9
#9	ロニー・ブリューワーRonnie Brewer	G/F	24	53	53	31.4	3.9	7.8	49.5	3.7	7.3	51.4	0.2	0.6	25.8	1.5	2.4	63.3	0.8	2.6	3.4	2.8	1.6	0.3	1.0	1.5	9.5
#26	カイル・コーバーKyle Korver	F/G	28	52	0	18.3	2.7	5.4	49.3	1.5	3.3	46.5	1.1	2.1	53.6	0.8	0.9	79.6	0.2	1.9	2.1	1.7	0.5	0.2	0.8	1.5	7.2
#44	キリーロ・フェセンコKyrylo Fesenko	C	23	49	5	8.3	1.1	1.9	54.7	1.1	1.9	55.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.5	1.2	42.1	0.7	1.2	1.8	0.3	0.1	0.4	0.5	1.6	2.6
#41	コスタ・クーフォスKosta Koufos	C	20	36	0	4.8	0.6	1.3	46.8	0.6	1.3	46.8	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.4	60.0	0.4	0.8	1.3	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.4	0.7	1.5
#15	サンディアタ・ゲインズSundiata Gaines	G	23	32	0	6.8	1.2	2.6	46.3	1.0	1.8	55.4	0.2	0.8	26.9	0.7	1.4	50.0	0.2	0.7	0.9	1.2	0.4	0.0	0.4	0.5	3.3
#3	エリック・メイノアEric Maynor	G	22	26	2	14.0	2.0	5.1	39.1	1.8	4.2	43.1	0.2	0.9	20.8	1.0	1.3	75.8	0.4	1.1	1.5	3.1	0.5	0.1	1.1	1.3	5.2
#6	オシアス・ジェッファーズOthyus Jeffers	G/F	24	14	0	5.2	0.9	2.1	41.4	0.9	2.1	41.4	0.0	0.0	—	0.9	1.4	68.4	0.6	0.8	1.4	0.1	0.3	0.0	0.4	0.7	2.6

Points per game: 104.2 #4
Points allowed per game: 98.9 #12
Offensive rating: 109.7 #7
Defensive rating: 104.0 #10
Net rating: +5.7 #3
eFG%: 52.4% #4
Turnover rate: 16.0% #25
Pace: 94.7 #9
Rebounds per game: 42.2 #12
Assists per game: 26.7 #1
Steals per game: 8.2 #4
Blocks per game: 4.9 #16

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: +3.1All-time 152/892
Defense: +2.6All-time 184/892
Diff: +5.7All-time 106/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off4/30B

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def13/30C

Off26/30E

BallKeep it / Take it

Def6/30B

Off10/30C

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def5/30B

Off5/30B

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def30/30G

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	52.4%	4/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	49.2%	13/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	16.0%	26/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	15.9%	6/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	31.3%	10/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	28.2%	5/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	34.0%	5/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	35.3%	30/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

FinalsPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	UTA	22	60	.268	15	—	9	30	27	20	26	16	2	8	30
2024-25	UTA	17	65	.207	15	—	21	30	28	21	30	5	20	30	24
2023-24	UTA	31	51	.378	12	—	11	28	23	17	30	3	10	29	9
2022-23	UTA	37	45	.451	12	—	7	24	22	15	28	5	9	30	6
2021-22	UTA	49	33	.598	5	Lost in round 1	7	10	3	2	15	3	27	18	10
2020-21	UTA	52	20	.722	1	Lost in the conf semifinals	4	3	1	5	18	1	22	29	8
2019-20	UTA	44	28	.611	6	Lost in round 1	18	9	9	2	20	13	26	29	25
2018-19	UTA	50	32	.610	5	Lost in round 1	17	4	4	5	26	8	7	12	2
2017-18	UTA	48	34	.585	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	19	1	5	10	19	20	21	4	8
2016-17	UTA	51	31	.622	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	28	1	6	8	12	19	28	29	8
2015-16	UTA	40	42	.488	9	—	28	2	10	14	20	18	28	16	13
2014-15	UTA	38	44	.463	11	—	26	1	17	16	26	11	29	16	2
2013-14	UTA	25	57	.305	15	—	29	18	28	22	14	23	26	25	18
2012-13	UTA	43	39	.524	9	—	13	15	15	15	19	14	13	7	4
2011-12	UTA	36	30	.545	8	Lost in round 1	4	23	16	18	11	3	11	7	4
2010-11	UTA	39	43	.476	11	—	14	19	20	15	19	26	4	7	2
2009-10	UTA	53	29	.646	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	4	12	3	4	26	12	1	4	15
2008-09	UTA	48	34	.585	8	Lost in round 1	7	18	9	10	22	18	1	1	19
2007-08	UTA	54	28	.659	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	5	13	4	3	18	24	2	3	22
2006-07	UTA	51	31	.622	4	Lost in the conf finals	7	17	8	11	20	7	2	20	22
2005-06	UTA	41	41	.500	9	—	26	9	23	28	27	9	7	28	2
2004-05	UTA	26	56	.317	14	—	25	16	27	26	25	26	7	26	16
2003-04	UTA	42	40	.512	9	—	27	9	17	23	27	21	19	23	6
2002-03	UTA	47	35	.573	7	Lost in round 1	17	6	8	10	26	20	1	7	7
2001-02	UTA	44	38	.537	8	Lost in round 1	14	13	14	17	28	14	1	2	4
2000-01	UTA	53	29	.646	4	Lost in round 1	10	8	3	4	21	23	1	11	9
1999-00	UTA	55	27	.671	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	20	5	6	9	10	24	3	15	10
1998-99	UTA	37	13	.740	1	Lost in the conf semifinals	9	5	2	7	25	16	3	19	7
1997-98	UTA	62	20	.756	1	Lost in the Finals	3	12	4	3	16	18	2	18	16
1996-97	UTA	64	18	.780	1	Lost in the Finals	1	8	2	1	12	18	1	3	12
1995-96	UTA	55	27	.671	3	Lost in the conf finals	9	6	3	5	7	15	1	10	12
1994-95	UTA	60	22	.732	3	Lost in round 1	5	7	2	2	8	20	2	4	16
1993-94	UTA	53	29	.646	5	Lost in the conf finals	10	9	7	10	2	18	4	7	22
1992-93	UTA	47	35	.573	6	Lost in round 1	11	10	9	11	9	17	3	10	24
1991-92	UTA	55	27	.671	2	Lost in the conf finals	8	6	3	6	13	10	6	13	13
1990-91	UTA	54	28	.659	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	16	3	8	7	11	23	3	18	9
1989-90	UTA	55	27	.671	4	Lost in round 1	15	3	6	1	21	19	4	17	6
1988-89	UTA	51	31	.622	2	Lost in round 1	21	1	5	11	19	9	10	14	2
1987-88	UTA	47	35	.573	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	10	5	7	3	20	8	2	4	1
1986-87	UTA	44	38	.537	4	Lost in round 1	15	9	11	21	12	9	6	2	2
1985-86	UTA	42	40	.512	5	Lost in round 1	18	9	12	12	16	12	8	13	2
1984-85	UTA	41	41	.500	6	Lost in the conf semifinals	14	8	12	18	17	7	14	9	1
1983-84	UTA	45	37	.549	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	5	20	8	5	14	6	5	10	2
1982-83	UTA	30	52	.366	9	—	11	19	18	15	20	12	8	9	2
1981-82	UTA	25	57	.305	11	—	7	22	21	—	11	14	18	11	19
1980-81	UTA	28	54	.341	11	—	22	12	20	—	4	22	19	18	16
1979-80	UTA	24	58	.293	10	—	22	10	21	—	11	22	18	21	15
1978-79	NOJ	26	56	.317	11	—	15	21	22	—	18	2	13	12	4
1977-78	NOJ	39	43	.476	7	—	13	13	16	—	16	1	10	18	4
1976-77	NOJ	35	47	.427	8	—	16	14	18	—	14	2	19	19	16
1975-76	NOJ	38	44	.463	7	—	10	9	11	—	12	6	13	9	12
1974-75	NOJ	23	59	.280	9	—	10	18	18	—	17	12	16	8	17

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

UTA ユタ・ジャズUtah Jazz 2009-10

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2009-10 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

UTA ユタ・ジャズUtah Jazz 2009-10

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2009-10 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary