DAL ダラス・マーベリックスDallas Mavericks 2008-09

Record: 50W32L
Conference: West 6
Playoffs: Lost in the conf semifinals
League: 9

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2008-09 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 14-1vs SAS#3
1. @+8
2. @−21
3. +21
4. +9
5. @+13
Conf semifinals1-4vs DEN#2
1. @−14
2. @−12
3. −1
4. +2
5. @−14

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

15151398816

Points

2591711811

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#41	ダーク・ノビツキーDirk Nowitzki	F	30	81	81	37.7	9.6	20.0	47.9	8.8	17.9	49.3	0.8	2.1	35.9	6.0	6.7	89.0	1.1	7.3	8.4	2.4	0.8	0.8	1.9	2.2	25.9
#2	ジェイソン・キッドJason Kidd	G	35	81	81	35.6	3.2	7.6	41.6	1.6	3.6	42.7	1.6	4.0	40.6	1.1	1.3	81.9	1.0	5.1	6.2	8.7	2.0	0.5	2.3	2.1	9.0
#32	ブランドン・バスBrandon Bass	F	23	81	0	19.4	3.1	6.3	49.6	3.1	6.2	50.2	0.0	0.1	0.0	2.2	2.6	86.7	1.6	2.9	4.5	0.5	0.3	0.7	1.1	1.7	8.5
#25	エリック・ダンピアーErick Dampier	C	33	80	80	23.0	2.3	3.5	65.0	2.3	3.5	65.0	0.0	0.0	—	1.1	1.8	63.8	2.7	4.4	7.1	1.0	0.3	1.2	0.9	2.4	5.7
#11	JJ・バレアJ.J. Barea	G	24	79	15	20.3	3.1	7.1	44.2	2.4	5.1	47.4	0.7	1.9	35.7	0.9	1.2	75.3	0.5	1.8	2.2	3.4	0.5	0.1	1.3	1.5	7.8
#31	ジェイソン・テリーJason Terry	G	31	74	11	33.7	7.3	15.8	46.3	5.1	9.6	52.5	2.3	6.2	36.6	2.7	3.0	88.0	0.5	1.9	2.4	3.4	1.3	0.3	1.6	1.9	19.6
#21	アントワン・ライトAntoine Wright	G/F	24	65	53	23.9	2.8	6.6	41.5	2.1	4.3	47.5	0.7	2.3	30.2	1.1	1.5	74.7	0.5	1.6	2.1	1.2	0.7	0.4	0.8	2.6	7.3
#33	ジェームズ・シングルトンJames Singleton	F	27	62	6	14.3	1.9	3.6	52.9	1.7	2.9	57.5	0.2	0.6	32.5	1.1	1.3	85.9	1.4	2.6	4.0	0.3	0.4	0.5	0.6	1.8	5.1
#5	ジョシュ・ハワードJosh Howard	F/G	28	52	51	32.0	6.8	15.1	45.1	5.7	11.8	48.0	1.1	3.2	34.5	3.3	4.2	78.2	1.1	3.9	5.1	1.6	1.1	0.6	1.7	2.6	18.0
#40	デビン・ジョージDevean George	F	31	43	17	16.5	1.3	3.3	38.0	0.7	1.5	48.5	0.5	1.8	28.9	0.4	0.5	77.3	0.6	1.2	1.8	0.3	0.5	0.3	0.4	1.3	3.4
#8	ジェラルド・グリーンGerald Green	G/F	23	38	12	9.9	2.1	4.7	43.9	1.7	3.5	48.5	0.4	1.2	30.4	0.7	0.8	84.4	0.4	1.1	1.4	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.9	1.3	5.2
#7	サガナ・ジョップDeSagana Diop	C	27	34	0	13.3	0.6	1.7	37.9	0.6	1.7	37.9	0.0	0.0	—	0.4	0.9	41.4	1.3	2.1	3.5	0.4	0.4	0.7	0.3	1.6	1.6
#1	ライアン・ホリンズRyan Hollins	C	24	27	2	9.6	1.1	2.2	52.5	1.1	2.2	52.5	0.0	0.0	—	0.6	1.2	51.5	1.0	1.3	2.3	0.1	0.1	0.6	0.5	1.6	2.9
#13	マット・キャロルMatt Carroll	G	28	21	0	6.7	0.4	1.6	27.3	0.4	1.2	32.0	0.0	0.4	12.5	0.3	0.3	100.0	0.1	0.6	0.7	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.3	0.7	1.2
#4	ショーン・ブライアン・ウィリアムズShawne Williams	F	22	15	0	11.3	1.1	3.7	28.6	1.0	2.6	38.5	0.1	1.1	5.9	0.6	0.7	81.8	1.3	1.8	3.1	0.1	0.1	0.6	0.3	1.3	2.8
#42	ジェリー・スタックハウスJerry Stackhouse	G/F	34	10	1	16.2	1.6	6.0	26.7	1.3	4.1	31.7	0.3	1.9	15.8	0.7	0.7	100.0	0.5	1.2	1.7	1.2	0.4	0.1	0.9	0.6	4.2

Points per game: 101.7 #9
Points allowed per game: 99.8 #15
Offensive rating: 109.0 #6
Defensive rating: 107.0 #17
Net rating: +2.0 #10
eFG%: 50.4% #9
Turnover rate: 13.6% #3
Pace: 92.7 #16
Rebounds per game: 42.7 #5
Assists per game: 21.7 #8
Steals per game: 7.2 #17
Blocks per game: 5.2 #9

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: +2.0All-time 243/892
Defense: −0.1All-time 447/892
Diff: +2.0All-time 333/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off10/30C

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def10/30C

Off3/30A

BallKeep it / Take it

Def26/30E

Off17/30D

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def11/30C

Off27/30E

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def7/30B

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	50.4%	10/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	49.3%	10/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	13.6%	3/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	13.9%	26/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	29.7%	17/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	29.3%	11/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	27.4%	27/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	28.2%	7/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionFinalsPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	DAL	26	56	.317	12	—	23	23	23	27	15	10	22	24	9
2024-25	DAL	39	43	.476	10	Lost in the play-in	15	20	19	14	12	23	22	20	7
2023-24	DAL	50	32	.610	5	Lost in the Finals	7	20	14	7	4	21	19	24	15
2022-23	DAL	38	44	.463	11	—	16	16	19	5	2	30	28	29	28
2021-22	DAL	52	30	.634	4	Lost in the conf finals	24	2	8	12	2	24	25	29	26
2020-21	DAL	42	30	.583	5	Lost in round 1	17	9	11	8	3	21	26	30	25
2019-20	DAL	43	32	.573	7	Lost in round 1	3	16	6	4	2	4	13	29	16
2018-19	DAL	33	49	.402	14	—	21	13	20	19	20	16	22	28	26
2017-18	DAL	24	58	.293	13	—	28	12	22	20	1	27	17	25	28
2016-17	DAL	33	49	.402	11	—	30	4	23	18	2	30	27	18	30
2015-16	DAL	42	40	.512	6	Lost in round 1	16	14	16	13	2	19	18	26	29
2014-15	DAL	50	32	.610	7	Lost in round 1	3	25	11	6	4	23	8	9	18
2013-14	DAL	49	33	.598	8	Lost in round 1	8	19	12	4	3	26	6	4	21
2012-13	DAL	41	41	.500	10	—	8	27	17	11	5	16	5	16	8
2011-12	DAL	36	30	.545	7	Lost in round 1	19	12	14	15	5	11	14	4	14
2010-11	DAL	57	25	.695	3	Champion	11	10	8	4	12	14	1	23	23
2009-10	DAL	55	27	.671	2	Lost in round 1	11	15	12	13	3	17	3	9	6
2008-09	DAL	50	32	.610	6	Lost in the conf semifinals	9	15	10	11	5	5	8	15	9
2007-08	DAL	51	31	.622	7	Lost in round 1	12	6	10	12	4	8	20	29	10
2006-07	DAL	67	15	.817	1	Lost in round 1	9	4	3	5	4	8	24	24	12
2005-06	DAL	60	22	.732	2	Lost in the Finals	9	7	3	9	5	6	29	13	2
2004-05	DAL	58	24	.707	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	3	14	4	8	4	8	26	4	7
2003-04	DAL	52	30	.634	5	Lost in round 1	1	28	6	3	1	2	3	13	10
2002-03	DAL	60	22	.732	3	Lost in the conf finals	1	16	1	3	1	17	9	11	13
2001-02	DAL	57	25	.695	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	1	28	4	2	1	12	14	22	18
2000-01	DAL	53	29	.646	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	4	15	4	3	4	21	18	19	5
1999-00	DAL	40	42	.488	9	—	3	25	18	7	2	22	18	22	14
1998-99	DAL	19	31	.380	11	—	15	21	23	19	4	12	27	26	4
1997-98	DAL	20	62	.244	10	—	26	19	24	26	5	23	28	18	6
1996-97	DAL	24	58	.293	11	—	26	14	24	28	19	17	24	15	21
1995-96	DAL	26	56	.317	12	—	9	29	24	27	13	2	11	17	21
1994-95	DAL	36	46	.439	10	—	9	24	19	26	21	1	11	26	25
1993-94	DAL	13	69	.159	13	—	27	17	27	27	21	20	27	6	27
1992-93	DAL	11	71	.134	13	—	26	27	27	27	27	17	27	17	22
1991-92	DAL	22	60	.268	12	—	27	14	26	26	6	11	26	27	24
1990-91	DAL	28	54	.341	12	—	25	12	22	16	4	22	24	26	17
1989-90	DAL	47	35	.573	6	Lost in round 1	22	4	16	17	5	17	26	18	14
1988-89	DAL	38	44	.463	9	—	24	4	17	15	3	23	24	23	7
1987-88	DAL	53	29	.646	3	Lost in the conf finals	7	6	5	15	3	1	17	18	12
1986-87	DAL	55	27	.671	2	Lost in round 1	3	14	4	4	1	5	16	16	13
1985-86	DAL	44	38	.537	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	21	9	4	1	15	14	21	17
1984-85	DAL	44	38	.537	4	Lost in round 1	9	7	8	8	1	19	13	22	20
1983-84	DAL	43	39	.524	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	11	13	11	7	1	21	12	21	18
1982-83	DAL	38	44	.463	8	—	5	17	15	11	1	9	6	23	22
1981-82	DAL	28	54	.341	10	—	19	13	20	—	2	18	8	23	22
1980-81	DAL	15	67	.183	12	—	21	19	23	—	5	22	17	23	23

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

DAL ダラス・マーベリックスDallas Mavericks 2008-09

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2008-09 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

DAL ダラス・マーベリックスDallas Mavericks 2008-09

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2008-09 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary