DAL ダラス・マーベリックスDallas Mavericks 2011-12

Record: 36W30L
Conference: West 7
Playoffs: Lost in round 1
League: 13

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2011-12 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 10-4vs OKC#2
1. @−1
2. @−3
3. −16
4. −6

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

13121210923

Points

2115111021

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#31	ジェイソン・テリーJason Terry	G	34	63	1	31.7	5.7	13.2	43.0	3.5	7.4	47.1	2.2	5.8	37.8	1.6	1.8	88.3	0.3	2.1	2.4	3.6	1.2	0.2	2.0	1.1	15.1
#0	ショーン・マリオンShawn Marion	F	33	63	63	30.5	4.6	10.3	44.6	4.3	9.2	46.4	0.3	1.1	29.4	1.2	1.5	79.6	2.3	5.1	7.4	2.1	1.1	0.6	1.6	1.4	10.6
#41	ダーク・ノビツキーDirk Nowitzki	F	33	62	62	33.5	7.6	16.7	45.7	6.4	13.3	48.1	1.3	3.4	36.8	5.1	5.7	89.6	0.7	6.0	6.7	2.2	0.7	0.5	1.9	2.1	21.6
#25	ビンス・カーターVince Carter	G/F	35	61	40	25.3	3.7	8.9	41.1	2.4	5.5	44.2	1.2	3.4	36.1	1.6	1.9	82.6	0.5	2.8	3.4	2.3	0.9	0.4	1.4	2.2	10.1
#28	イアン・マインミIan Mahinmi	C	25	61	12	18.7	2.1	3.9	54.6	2.1	3.9	54.9	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.5	2.4	63.9	1.8	3.0	4.7	0.2	0.6	0.5	0.8	2.9	5.8
#33	ブレンダン・ヘイウッドBrendan Haywood	C	32	54	54	21.2	2.2	4.2	51.8	2.2	4.2	51.8	0.0	0.0	—	0.8	1.8	46.9	2.6	3.4	6.0	0.4	0.4	1.0	0.9	2.2	5.2
#3	ロドリグ・ボーボワRodrigue Beaubois	G	23	53	12	21.7	3.5	8.4	42.2	2.8	5.9	47.9	0.7	2.5	28.8	1.1	1.3	84.1	0.4	2.5	2.8	2.9	1.1	0.5	1.3	1.8	8.9
#7	ラマー・オドムLamar Odom	F	32	50	4	20.5	2.5	7.0	35.2	1.9	4.8	39.9	0.6	2.2	25.2	1.2	2.0	59.2	0.7	3.4	4.2	1.7	0.4	0.4	1.0	1.9	6.6
#34	ブランダン・ライトBrandan Wright	F	24	49	0	16.1	2.9	4.8	61.8	2.9	4.7	62.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.1	1.7	63.4	1.3	2.3	3.6	0.3	0.4	1.3	0.4	1.2	6.9
#2	ジェイソン・キッドJason Kidd	G	38	48	48	28.7	2.1	5.7	36.3	0.4	1.0	40.0	1.6	4.6	35.4	0.5	0.6	78.6	0.3	3.8	4.1	5.5	1.7	0.2	1.9	1.7	6.2
#13	デロンテ・ウェストDelonte West	G	28	44	33	24.1	3.8	8.2	46.1	3.2	6.5	48.9	0.6	1.7	35.5	1.4	1.6	88.6	0.3	2.0	2.3	3.2	1.3	0.3	1.7	1.5	9.6
#35	ブライアン・カーディナルBrian Cardinal	F	34	44	0	6.2	0.3	1.3	25.5	0.1	0.1	66.7	0.2	1.1	20.4	0.1	0.1	83.3	0.1	0.7	0.8	0.4	0.2	0.0	0.2	0.9	1.0
#20	ドミニク・ジョーンズDominique Jones	G	23	33	1	8.1	0.9	2.2	39.7	0.8	2.0	43.1	0.0	0.2	12.5	0.9	1.1	78.4	0.3	1.1	1.3	1.3	0.3	0.2	0.8	0.8	2.7
#9	イー・ジェンリェンYi Jianlian	F	24	30	0	6.8	1.0	2.7	37.8	0.9	2.4	38.9	0.1	0.3	30.0	0.5	0.7	66.7	0.4	1.2	1.6	0.2	0.2	0.3	0.5	0.8	2.6
#32	ショーン・ウィリアムズSean Williams	F/C	25	8	0	8.1	1.5	2.0	75.0	1.5	2.0	75.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.6	0.8	83.3	1.1	0.5	1.6	0.3	0.1	0.6	0.9	1.8	3.6
#4	ケレンナ・アズブイケKelenna Azubuike	G	28	3	0	6.0	1.0	2.7	37.5	0.7	1.7	40.0	0.3	1.0	33.3	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.0	1.3	0.3	2.3

Points per game: 95.8 #19
Points allowed per game: 94.8 #12
Offensive rating: 102.1 #22
Defensive rating: 100.9 #8
Net rating: +1.1 #14
eFG%: 48.9% #15
Turnover rate: 14.9% #6
Pace: 92.6 #12
Rebounds per game: 42.8 #11
Assists per game: 20.9 #15
Steals per game: 8.6 #4
Blocks per game: 5.1 #14

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: −1.4All-time 606/892
Defense: +2.6All-time 180/892
Diff: +1.1All-time 394/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off15/30C

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def8/30B

Off6/30B

BallKeep it / Take it

Def14/30C

Off28/30F

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def4/30B

Off27/30E

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def13/30C

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	48.9%	15/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	47.9%	8/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	14.9%	6/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	15.7%	14/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	26.8%	28/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	28.6%	4/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	24.6%	27/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	27.0%	13/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionFinalsPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	DAL	26	56	.317	12	—	23	23	23	27	15	10	22	24	9
2024-25	DAL	39	43	.476	10	Lost in the play-in	15	20	19	14	12	23	22	20	7
2023-24	DAL	50	32	.610	5	Lost in the Finals	7	20	14	7	4	21	19	24	15
2022-23	DAL	38	44	.463	11	—	16	16	19	5	2	30	28	29	28
2021-22	DAL	52	30	.634	4	Lost in the conf finals	24	2	8	12	2	24	25	29	26
2020-21	DAL	42	30	.583	5	Lost in round 1	17	9	11	8	3	21	26	30	25
2019-20	DAL	43	32	.573	7	Lost in round 1	3	16	6	4	2	4	13	29	16
2018-19	DAL	33	49	.402	14	—	21	13	20	19	20	16	22	28	26
2017-18	DAL	24	58	.293	13	—	28	12	22	20	1	27	17	25	28
2016-17	DAL	33	49	.402	11	—	30	4	23	18	2	30	27	18	30
2015-16	DAL	42	40	.512	6	Lost in round 1	16	14	16	13	2	19	18	26	29
2014-15	DAL	50	32	.610	7	Lost in round 1	3	25	11	6	4	23	8	9	18
2013-14	DAL	49	33	.598	8	Lost in round 1	8	19	12	4	3	26	6	4	21
2012-13	DAL	41	41	.500	10	—	8	27	17	11	5	16	5	16	8
2011-12	DAL	36	30	.545	7	Lost in round 1	19	12	14	15	5	11	14	4	14
2010-11	DAL	57	25	.695	3	Champion	11	10	8	4	12	14	1	23	23
2009-10	DAL	55	27	.671	2	Lost in round 1	11	15	12	13	3	17	3	9	6
2008-09	DAL	50	32	.610	6	Lost in the conf semifinals	9	15	10	11	5	5	8	15	9
2007-08	DAL	51	31	.622	7	Lost in round 1	12	6	10	12	4	8	20	29	10
2006-07	DAL	67	15	.817	1	Lost in round 1	9	4	3	5	4	8	24	24	12
2005-06	DAL	60	22	.732	2	Lost in the Finals	9	7	3	9	5	6	29	13	2
2004-05	DAL	58	24	.707	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	3	14	4	8	4	8	26	4	7
2003-04	DAL	52	30	.634	5	Lost in round 1	1	28	6	3	1	2	3	13	10
2002-03	DAL	60	22	.732	3	Lost in the conf finals	1	16	1	3	1	17	9	11	13
2001-02	DAL	57	25	.695	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	1	28	4	2	1	12	14	22	18
2000-01	DAL	53	29	.646	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	4	15	4	3	4	21	18	19	5
1999-00	DAL	40	42	.488	9	—	3	25	18	7	2	22	18	22	14
1998-99	DAL	19	31	.380	11	—	15	21	23	19	4	12	27	26	4
1997-98	DAL	20	62	.244	10	—	26	19	24	26	5	23	28	18	6
1996-97	DAL	24	58	.293	11	—	26	14	24	28	19	17	24	15	21
1995-96	DAL	26	56	.317	12	—	9	29	24	27	13	2	11	17	21
1994-95	DAL	36	46	.439	10	—	9	24	19	26	21	1	11	26	25
1993-94	DAL	13	69	.159	13	—	27	17	27	27	21	20	27	6	27
1992-93	DAL	11	71	.134	13	—	26	27	27	27	27	17	27	17	22
1991-92	DAL	22	60	.268	12	—	27	14	26	26	6	11	26	27	24
1990-91	DAL	28	54	.341	12	—	25	12	22	16	4	22	24	26	17
1989-90	DAL	47	35	.573	6	Lost in round 1	22	4	16	17	5	17	26	18	14
1988-89	DAL	38	44	.463	9	—	24	4	17	15	3	23	24	23	7
1987-88	DAL	53	29	.646	3	Lost in the conf finals	7	6	5	15	3	1	17	18	12
1986-87	DAL	55	27	.671	2	Lost in round 1	3	14	4	4	1	5	16	16	13
1985-86	DAL	44	38	.537	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	21	9	4	1	15	14	21	17
1984-85	DAL	44	38	.537	4	Lost in round 1	9	7	8	8	1	19	13	22	20
1983-84	DAL	43	39	.524	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	11	13	11	7	1	21	12	21	18
1982-83	DAL	38	44	.463	8	—	5	17	15	11	1	9	6	23	22
1981-82	DAL	28	54	.341	10	—	19	13	20	—	2	18	8	23	22
1980-81	DAL	15	67	.183	12	—	21	19	23	—	5	22	17	23	23

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

DAL ダラス・マーベリックスDallas Mavericks 2011-12

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2011-12 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

DAL ダラス・マーベリックスDallas Mavericks 2011-12

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2011-12 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary