IND インディアナ・ペイサーズIndiana Pacers 2008-09

Record: 36W46L
Conference: East 9
Playoffs: Missed the playoffs
League: 18

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2008-09 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

1413121199917

Points

12122013916

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#1	ジャレット・ジャックJarrett Jack	G	25	82	53	33.1	4.7	10.4	45.3	3.8	7.7	48.7	1.0	2.7	35.3	2.7	3.2	85.2	0.5	2.8	3.4	4.1	1.1	0.2	2.2	2.2	13.1
#25	ブランドン・ラッシュBrandon Rush	G	23	75	19	24.0	3.2	7.7	42.3	2.2	4.9	45.1	1.0	2.8	37.3	0.6	0.9	69.7	0.5	2.7	3.1	0.9	0.5	0.5	1.0	1.7	8.1
#5	TJ・フォードT.J. Ford	G	25	74	49	30.5	5.6	12.3	45.2	5.1	10.9	46.7	0.5	1.4	33.7	3.3	3.8	87.2	0.8	2.7	3.5	5.3	1.2	0.2	2.4	2.4	14.9
#10	ジェフ・フォスターJeff Foster	C	32	74	26	24.7	2.4	4.8	50.1	2.4	4.7	50.6	0.0	0.1	28.6	1.3	2.0	65.8	2.9	4.0	6.9	1.8	0.7	0.7	1.2	3.1	6.1
#3	トロイ・マーフィーTroy Murphy	F/C	28	73	73	34.0	5.0	10.5	47.5	2.8	5.6	49.6	2.2	4.9	45.0	2.1	2.5	82.6	2.0	9.8	11.8	2.4	0.8	0.5	1.6	3.1	14.3
#8	ラドスラフ・ネステロビッチRasho Nesterovic	C	32	70	19	17.3	3.2	6.2	51.3	3.2	6.2	51.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.4	0.5	78.1	1.3	2.1	3.4	1.6	0.4	0.5	0.9	2.4	6.8
#55	ロイ・ヒバートRoy Hibbert	C	22	70	42	14.4	2.8	6.0	47.1	2.8	6.0	47.1	0.0	0.0	—	1.4	2.1	66.7	1.6	1.8	3.5	0.7	0.3	1.1	0.8	3.1	7.1
#33	ダニー・グレンジャーDanny Granger	F/G	25	67	66	36.2	8.5	19.1	44.7	5.8	12.3	47.0	2.7	6.7	40.4	6.0	6.9	87.8	0.7	4.4	5.1	2.7	1.0	1.4	2.5	3.1	25.8
#12	トラビス・ディーナーTravis Diener	G	26	55	0	13.1	1.3	3.3	41.3	0.5	1.1	45.9	0.8	2.1	39.0	0.2	0.3	80.0	0.1	1.5	1.6	2.2	0.5	0.1	0.4	0.8	3.7
#6	マーキス・ダニエルズMarquis Daniels	G	28	54	43	31.5	5.8	12.8	45.1	5.4	11.1	48.9	0.3	1.7	20.0	1.7	2.4	72.1	1.5	3.1	4.6	2.1	1.1	0.5	1.7	2.2	13.6
#23	スティーブン・グラハムStephen Graham	F	26	52	6	13.2	2.0	4.9	41.4	1.7	3.7	45.3	0.4	1.3	30.3	1.0	1.2	80.6	0.4	1.4	1.8	0.6	0.2	0.1	0.9	1.6	5.4
#32	ジョシュ・マクロバーツJosh McRoberts	F	21	33	0	8.5	1.1	2.5	42.2	1.1	2.2	47.9	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.4	76.9	0.8	1.5	2.2	0.5	0.4	0.5	0.4	1.2	2.4
#9	マクエオ・バストンMaceo Baston	F	32	27	0	8.0	0.9	1.7	54.3	0.9	1.7	55.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.6	1.0	63.0	0.8	1.1	1.9	0.3	0.2	0.4	0.4	1.4	2.5
#17	マイク・ダンリービーJr.Mike Dunleavy	F/G	28	18	14	27.5	5.2	12.9	40.1	3.4	7.9	43.0	1.8	5.0	35.6	2.9	3.6	81.5	0.8	3.0	3.8	2.4	0.7	0.5	2.1	2.0	15.1
#11	ジャマール・ティンズリーJamaal Tinsley	G	30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Points per game: 105.1 #5
Points allowed per game: 106.2 #26
Offensive rating: 107.2 #14
Defensive rating: 108.2 #20
Net rating: -1.0 #18
eFG%: 50.1% #13
Turnover rate: 14.8% #14
Pace: 97.3 #3
Rebounds per game: 43.7 #2
Assists per game: 21.6 #9
Steals per game: 7.0 #20
Blocks per game: 5.3 #8

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: +0.2All-time 418/892
Defense: −1.3All-time 577/892
Diff: −1.0All-time 541/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off15/30C

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def14/30C

Off14/30C

BallKeep it / Take it

Def22/30D

Off21/30D

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def12/30C

Off29/30F

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def27/30E

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	50.1%	15/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	49.9%	14/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	14.8%	14/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	14.3%	22/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	29.1%	21/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	29.3%	12/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	26.7%	29/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	35.4%	27/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

FinalsPlayoff lineLost above the line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	IND	19	63	.232	14	—	27	25	26	23	15	25	12	26	19
2024-25	IND	50	32	.610	4	Lost in the Finals	7	17	12	4	3	27	3	8	4
2023-24	IND	47	35	.573	6	Lost in the conf finals	1	27	9	1	9	28	1	10	8
2022-23	IND	35	47	.427	11	—	10	29	25	16	23	24	6	8	2
2021-22	IND	25	57	.305	13	—	14	25	24	20	22	21	9	23	3
2020-21	IND	34	38	.472	9	Lost in the play-in	6	25	17	13	12	25	2	5	1
2019-20	IND	45	28	.616	4	Lost in round 1	23	3	13	14	5	24	5	20	10
2018-19	IND	48	34	.585	5	Lost in round 1	22	1	10	11	10	24	7	3	18
2017-18	IND	48	34	.585	5	Lost in round 1	16	9	12	11	5	22	23	2	25
2016-17	IND	42	40	.512	7	Lost in round 1	15	14	17	14	16	26	15	5	8
2015-16	IND	45	37	.549	7	Lost in round 1	17	8	11	20	20	11	22	4	16
2014-15	IND	38	44	.463	9	—	24	3	16	23	12	4	18	29	15
2013-14	IND	56	26	.683	1	Lost in the conf finals	24	2	7	19	19	6	27	27	5
2012-13	IND	49	32	.605	3	Lost in the conf finals	23	2	8	22	23	1	27	22	4
2011-12	IND	42	24	.636	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	13	10	7	23	5	4	29	15	9
2010-11	IND	37	45	.451	8	Lost in round 1	13	17	19	23	27	5	28	19	6
2009-10	IND	32	50	.390	10	—	16	23	21	23	23	19	15	16	7
2008-09	IND	36	46	.439	9	—	5	26	19	13	19	2	9	20	7
2007-08	IND	36	46	.439	9	—	7	26	18	14	26	7	7	11	9
2006-07	IND	35	47	.427	9	—	23	11	20	29	25	9	18	10	4
2005-06	IND	41	41	.500	6	Lost in round 1	23	5	9	17	26	6	19	10	12
2004-05	IND	44	38	.537	6	Lost in the conf semifinals	25	5	15	18	15	26	29	16	19
2003-04	IND	61	21	.744	1	Lost in the conf finals	20	3	3	15	9	18	12	5	11
2002-03	IND	48	34	.585	3	Lost in round 1	9	13	6	20	15	5	4	8	14
2001-02	IND	42	40	.512	8	Lost in round 1	9	18	15	12	23	10	8	12	15
2000-01	IND	41	41	.500	8	Lost in round 1	19	9	18	15	14	10	17	24	7
1999-00	IND	56	26	.683	1	Lost in the Finals	4	12	5	1	7	20	13	26	14
1998-99	IND	33	17	.660	1	Lost in the conf finals	6	13	5	5	2	19	21	29	19
1997-98	IND	58	24	.707	3	Lost in the conf finals	12	5	5	4	4	27	11	18	20
1996-97	IND	39	43	.476	10	—	19	9	14	17	21	10	16	28	14
1995-96	IND	52	30	.634	3	Lost in round 1	16	7	7	12	18	21	10	24	26
1994-95	IND	52	30	.634	2	Lost in the conf finals	18	4	8	11	19	17	14	8	20
1993-94	IND	47	35	.573	5	Lost in the conf finals	15	8	10	7	25	10	12	15	6
1992-93	IND	41	41	.500	8	Lost in round 1	7	16	10	10	7	5	5	22	17
1991-92	IND	40	42	.488	6	Lost in round 1	2	24	11	2	26	8	1	15	18
1990-91	IND	41	41	.500	7	Lost in round 1	5	25	16	3	17	19	6	18	24
1989-90	IND	42	40	.512	7	Lost in round 1	10	22	15	2	17	23	16	24	20
1988-89	IND	28	54	.341	10	—	15	18	19	7	20	16	19	24	13
1987-88	IND	38	44	.463	7	—	20	7	16	10	7	13	18	21	21
1986-87	IND	41	41	.500	7	Lost in round 1	18	7	13	19	5	14	11	14	23
1985-86	IND	26	56	.317	10	—	21	7	19	18	16	2	10	17	15
1984-85	IND	22	60	.268	11	—	17	20	22	20	23	2	21	19	17
1983-84	IND	26	56	.317	11	—	19	11	22	18	17	18	11	1	12
1982-83	IND	20	62	.244	11	—	12	21	21	16	8	14	10	9	14
1981-82	IND	35	47	.427	8	—	22	6	16	—	7	14	18	5	6
1980-81	IND	44	38	.537	6	Lost in round 1	13	8	9	—	10	12	11	6	8
1979-80	IND	37	45	.451	8	—	6	17	12	—	9	8	9	2	6
1978-79	IND	38	44	.463	8	—	13	10	14	—	6	9	15	16	10
1977-78	IND	31	51	.378	10	—	11	17	19	—	9	5	13	9	6
1976-77	IND	36	46	.439	9	—	11	17	16	—	6	4	6	3	7

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

IND インディアナ・ペイサーズIndiana Pacers 2008-09

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2008-09 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

IND インディアナ・ペイサーズIndiana Pacers 2008-09

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2008-09 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary