CHI シカゴ・ブルズChicago Bulls 2002-03

Record: 30W52L
Conference: East 12
Playoffs: Missed the playoffs
League: 23

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2002-03 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

1712101010918

Points

231311991114

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#5	ジェイレン・ローズJalen Rose	F/G	30	82	82	40.9	7.8	19.3	40.6	6.2	14.9	41.6	1.6	4.4	37.0	4.9	5.7	85.4	0.8	3.5	4.3	4.8	0.9	0.3	3.5	3.3	22.1
#44	トレントン・ハッセルTrenton Hassell	G	23	82	53	24.4	1.8	4.8	36.7	1.6	4.3	37.2	0.2	0.5	32.5	0.5	0.7	74.5	0.5	2.7	3.1	1.8	0.5	0.7	1.0	2.4	4.2
#2	エディ・カリーEddy Curry	F/C	20	81	48	19.4	4.1	7.1	58.5	4.1	7.1	58.5	0.0	0.0	—	2.2	3.5	62.4	1.4	2.9	4.4	0.5	0.2	0.8	1.7	2.8	10.5
#1	ジャマール・クロフォードJamal Crawford	—	22	80	31	24.9	4.2	10.1	41.3	3.1	7.1	43.8	1.1	3.0	35.5	1.3	1.6	80.6	0.3	2.1	2.3	4.2	1.0	0.3	1.7	1.6	10.7
#42	ドニエル・マーシャルDonyell Marshall	F	29	78	53	30.5	5.4	11.8	45.9	5.0	10.7	46.7	0.4	1.1	37.9	2.1	2.8	75.6	3.0	6.0	9.0	1.8	1.2	1.1	1.7	3.0	13.4
#22	ジェイ・ウィリアムズJay Williams	G	21	75	54	26.1	3.6	9.1	39.9	2.8	6.4	43.1	0.9	2.7	32.2	1.4	2.1	64.0	0.4	2.2	2.6	4.7	1.1	0.2	2.3	2.4	9.5
#3	タイソン・チャンドラーTyson Chandler	C/F	20	75	68	24.4	3.4	6.5	53.1	3.4	6.5	53.1	0.0	0.0	—	2.4	3.9	60.8	2.3	4.6	6.9	1.0	0.5	1.4	1.8	2.9	9.2
#32	エディ・ロビンソンEddie Robinson	F	26	64	18	21.2	2.4	4.9	49.2	2.4	4.7	50.5	0.0	0.2	21.4	0.8	1.0	81.0	1.2	1.9	3.1	1.0	1.0	0.2	0.8	1.9	5.7
#20	フレッド・ホイバーグFred Hoiberg	G	30	63	0	12.4	0.8	2.0	38.9	0.7	1.7	41.9	0.1	0.3	23.8	0.7	0.8	82.0	0.2	2.0	2.2	1.1	0.6	0.1	0.4	0.9	2.3
#35	ロニー・バクスターLonny Baxter	F	24	55	0	12.4	1.7	3.7	46.6	1.7	3.7	47.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.3	1.9	68.0	1.2	1.8	3.0	0.3	0.2	0.4	0.8	2.5	4.8
#43	コーイ・ブラントCorie Blount	F/C	34	50	3	16.7	1.3	2.7	48.5	1.3	2.7	48.5	0.0	0.0	—	0.4	0.7	57.1	1.4	2.7	4.1	1.0	0.7	0.4	0.9	2.4	3.0
#21	マーカス・フィザーMarcus Fizer	F	24	38	0	21.3	4.7	10.1	46.5	4.7	9.9	46.9	0.0	0.2	16.7	2.3	3.5	65.7	2.1	3.6	5.7	1.3	0.4	0.4	1.5	2.3	11.7
#9	リック・ブランソンRick Brunson	G	30	17	0	11.5	1.4	2.9	46.0	1.1	2.6	43.2	0.2	0.4	66.7	0.6	0.7	83.3	0.2	0.9	1.1	2.1	0.6	0.2	1.0	1.2	3.5
#31	ロジャー・メイソンRoger Mason Jr.	G	22	17	0	6.6	0.6	1.8	35.5	0.3	0.8	38.5	0.4	1.1	33.3	0.1	0.1	100.0	0.1	0.6	0.7	0.7	0.2	0.0	0.3	1.2	1.8
#11	ダリボル・バガリッチDalibor Bagaric	C	22	10	0	7.6	0.8	2.6	30.8	0.8	2.6	30.8	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.4	75.0	0.7	1.3	2.0	0.4	0.3	0.3	0.5	1.1	1.9
#6	ダグ・オバートンDoug Overton	G	33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Points per game: 95.0 #16
Points allowed per game: 100.1 #26
Offensive rating: 99.1 #26
Defensive rating: 104.2 #21
Net rating: -5.1 #25
eFG%: 47.1% #18
Turnover rate: 17.7% #25
Pace: 94.8 #4
Rebounds per game: 43.0 #9
Assists per game: 21.7 #13
Steals per game: 7.4 #22
Blocks per game: 5.6 #10

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: −3.1All-time 748/892
Defense: −2.0All-time 666/892
Diff: −5.1All-time 741/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off18/29D

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def10/29C

Off25/29E

BallKeep it / Take it

Def21/29D

Off18/29D

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def25/29E

Off15/29C

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def28/29F

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	47.1%	18/29	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	47.0%	10/29
Ball	Ball security	Lost	17.7%	25/29	Forcing turnovers	Taken	15.3%	21/29
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	30.7%	18/29	Defensive boards	Allowed	32.8%	25/29
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	30.0%	15/29	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	35.1%	28/29

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	CHI	31	51	.378	12	—	11	28	22	14	23	9	7	23	11
2024-25	CHI	39	43	.476	9	Lost in the play-in	6	28	20	13	20	3	4	23	18
2023-24	CHI	39	43	.476	9	Lost in the play-in	22	16	20	22	3	14	23	7	18
2022-23	CHI	40	42	.488	10	Lost in the play-in	22	7	13	13	7	21	20	7	19
2021-22	CHI	46	36	.561	6	Lost in round 1	13	16	20	10	6	28	18	23	25
2020-21	CHI	31	41	.431	11	—	21	14	20	10	27	11	5	27	27
2019-20	CHI	22	43	.338	11	—	27	13	22	24	27	29	23	1	25
2018-19	CHI	22	60	.268	13	—	27	20	27	28	18	25	27	18	26
2017-18	CHI	27	55	.329	13	—	26	27	29	29	13	6	10	17	30
2016-17	CHI	41	41	.500	8	Lost in round 1	23	6	14	30	12	3	14	15	14
2015-16	CHI	42	40	.512	9	—	21	16	18	26	13	2	11	29	8
2014-15	CHI	50	32	.610	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	15	9	10	21	12	3	14	28	5
2013-14	CHI	48	34	.585	4	Lost in round 1	30	1	13	30	17	10	10	21	7
2012-13	CHI	45	37	.549	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	28	3	14	29	10	8	7	22	15
2011-12	CHI	50	16	.758	1	Lost in round 1	18	1	1	14	5	1	5	24	3
2010-11	CHI	62	20	.756	1	Lost in the conf finals	19	2	2	13	17	2	9	17	5
2009-10	CHI	41	41	.500	8	Lost in round 1	24	13	18	28	15	1	19	23	2
2008-09	CHI	41	41	.500	7	Lost in round 1	8	21	16	21	19	8	13	8	4
2007-08	CHI	33	49	.402	11	—	18	16	21	28	18	8	11	9	6
2006-07	CHI	49	33	.598	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	13	6	4	17	23	1	9	4	5
2005-06	CHI	41	41	.500	7	Lost in round 1	13	16	14	19	24	3	6	30	21
2004-05	CHI	47	35	.573	3	Lost in round 1	21	7	12	25	30	2	15	20	18
2003-04	CHI	23	59	.280	14	—	26	18	28	29	23	4	9	13	15
2002-03	CHI	30	52	.366	12	—	16	26	26	17	27	9	13	21	10
2001-02	CHI	21	61	.256	15	—	28	23	29	26	24	28	12	17	23
2000-01	CHI	15	67	.183	15	—	29	19	29	28	21	29	12	7	24
1999-00	CHI	17	65	.207	15	—	29	9	28	29	29	25	26	14	18
1998-99	CHI	13	37	.260	15	—	29	14	29	29	16	26	19	12	29
1997-98	CHI	62	20	.756	1	Champion	9	3	3	19	5	2	7	10	23
1996-97	CHI	69	13	.841	1	Champion	1	6	1	5	2	2	2	7	25
1995-96	CHI	72	10	.878	1	Champion	1	2	1	4	4	4	5	3	21
1994-95	CHI	47	35	.573	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	12	5	5	9	10	11	10	2	23
1993-94	CHI	55	27	.671	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	22	3	11	9	12	12	7	12	23
1992-93	CHI	57	25	.695	2	Champion	14	2	4	8	1	12	6	5	15
1991-92	CHI	67	15	.817	1	Champion	5	3	1	3	2	13	3	17	9
1990-91	CHI	61	21	.744	1	Champion	7	4	1	1	2	15	3	4	12
1989-90	CHI	55	27	.671	3	Lost in the conf finals	9	12	9	3	10	21	7	2	16
1988-89	CHI	47	35	.573	6	Lost in the conf finals	17	5	13	5	10	22	6	14	21
1987-88	CHI	50	32	.610	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	19	1	9	9	4	6	9	11	8
1986-87	CHI	40	42	.488	8	Lost in round 1	20	2	9	18	3	9	12	17	10
1985-86	CHI	30	52	.366	8	Lost in round 1	13	17	21	17	10	11	19	21	12
1984-85	CHI	38	44	.463	7	Lost in round 1	15	11	14	7	9	19	20	19	10
1983-84	CHI	27	55	.329	10	—	20	9	23	21	19	14	16	13	9
1982-83	CHI	28	54	.341	9	—	9	22	20	17	22	4	15	18	17
1981-82	CHI	34	48	.415	9	—	15	11	17	—	22	6	14	22	7
1980-81	CHI	45	37	.549	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	10	11	7	—	20	6	21	12	6
1979-80	CHI	30	52	.366	8	—	17	14	17	—	19	19	9	18	13
1978-79	CHI	31	51	.378	11	—	22	6	19	—	21	7	8	22	20
1977-78	CHI	40	42	.488	8	—	20	5	14	—	12	14	8	18	20
1976-77	CHI	44	38	.537	5	Lost in round 1	21	1	9	—	3	4	9	16	16
1975-76	CHI	24	58	.293	9	—	18	1	17	—	3	3	15	16	18
1974-75	CHI	47	35	.573	2	Lost in the conf finals	18	1	4	—	3	7	15	12	6
1973-74	CHI	54	28	.659	3	Lost in the conf finals	12	2	4	—	9	14	14	6	11
1972-73	CHI	51	31	.622	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	13	3	5	—	—	—	11	—	—
1971-72	CHI	57	25	.695	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	6	1	3	—	—	—	4	—	—
1970-71	CHI	51	31	.622	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	12	2	2	—	—	—	4	—	—
1969-70	CHI	39	43	.476	3	Lost in the div semifinals	10	6	8	—	—	—	4	—	—
1968-69	CHI	33	49	.402	5	—	14	3	10	—	—	—	14	—	—
1967-68	CHI	29	53	.354	4	Lost in the div semifinals	12	3	10	—	—	—	12	—	—
1966-67	CHI	33	48	.407	4	Lost in the div semifinals	9	5	8	—	—	—	6	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

CHI シカゴ・ブルズChicago Bulls 2002-03

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2002-03 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

CHI シカゴ・ブルズChicago Bulls 2002-03

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2002-03 standings through the season

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary