CHI シカゴ・ブルズChicago Bulls 2009-10

Record: 41W41L
Conference: East 8
Playoffs: Lost in round 1
League: 17

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2009-10 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 11-4vs CLE#1
1. @−13
2. @−10
3. +2
4. −23
5. @−2

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

141312111010917

Points

201510999815

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#22	タージ・ギブソンTaj Gibson	F	24	82	70	26.9	3.8	7.7	49.4	3.8	7.7	49.4	0.0	0.0	—	1.4	2.1	64.6	2.8	4.7	7.5	0.9	0.6	1.3	1.4	3.4	9.0
#52	ブラッド・ミラーBrad Miller	F/C	33	82	37	23.8	3.0	7.1	43.0	2.6	5.5	47.4	0.5	1.6	28.0	2.2	2.7	82.7	1.0	3.9	4.9	1.9	0.5	0.4	1.3	2.3	8.8
#1	デリック・ローズDerrick Rose	G	21	78	78	36.8	8.6	17.6	48.9	8.4	16.8	50.0	0.2	0.8	26.7	3.3	4.3	76.6	0.8	2.9	3.8	6.0	0.7	0.3	2.8	1.2	20.8
#12	カーク・ハインリックKirk Hinrich	G	29	74	53	33.5	4.2	10.2	40.9	2.8	6.4	43.1	1.4	3.8	37.1	1.1	1.5	75.2	0.3	3.2	3.5	4.5	1.1	0.3	1.5	2.8	10.9
#9	ルオル・デンLuol Deng	F	24	70	69	37.9	6.8	14.5	46.6	6.3	13.3	47.4	0.5	1.2	38.6	3.6	4.7	76.4	1.9	5.4	7.3	2.0	0.9	0.9	1.9	1.8	17.6
#16	ジェームズ・ジョンソンJames Johnson	F	22	65	11	11.6	1.5	3.2	45.2	1.2	2.5	48.8	0.2	0.7	32.6	0.8	1.1	72.9	0.5	1.4	2.0	0.7	0.3	0.7	1.0	1.9	3.9
#13	ジョアキム・ノアJoakim Noah	C/F	24	64	54	30.1	4.1	8.1	50.4	4.1	8.1	50.4	0.0	0.0	—	2.5	3.4	74.4	3.4	7.6	11.0	2.1	0.5	1.6	1.8	3.1	10.7
#2	ジャンネロ・パーゴJannero Pargo	G	30	63	5	13.2	2.1	6.0	34.6	1.5	3.9	38.7	0.6	2.2	27.5	0.7	0.7	93.3	0.1	1.1	1.2	1.4	0.5	0.0	0.8	1.1	5.5
#15	ジョン・サーモンズJohn Salmons	G	30	51	28	33.2	4.5	10.7	42.0	3.1	7.0	44.1	1.4	3.8	38.0	2.3	2.9	78.9	0.4	3.1	3.4	2.5	1.3	0.4	1.4	2.0	12.7
#6	ロナルド・マレーFlip Murray	G	30	29	1	23.4	3.7	9.4	39.7	2.8	6.3	44.0	1.0	3.1	31.1	1.7	2.2	76.2	0.4	2.5	2.9	1.8	0.6	0.1	0.9	1.7	10.1
#24	タイラス・トーマスTyrus Thomas	F	23	29	3	23.4	3.4	7.1	48.3	3.4	7.0	48.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	3.1	64.4	1.4	4.9	6.3	1.1	1.4	1.7	1.8	2.2	8.8
#21	ハキム・ウォリックHakim Warrick	F	27	28	0	19.0	3.0	6.1	48.3	3.0	6.1	48.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.8	3.6	75.5	1.4	2.2	3.6	0.6	0.3	0.3	0.8	1.5	8.7
#35	クリス・リチャードChris Richard	F	25	18	0	12.4	0.8	1.6	51.7	0.8	1.6	51.7	0.0	0.0	—	0.4	0.6	63.6	1.1	2.2	3.3	0.4	0.4	0.2	0.8	2.8	2.1
#11	リンジー・ハンターLindsey Hunter	—	39	13	0	9.4	0.4	2.3	16.7	0.3	1.3	23.5	0.1	1.0	7.7	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.1	1.0	1.1	0.7	0.1	0.0	0.3	0.9	1.0
#0	エイシー・ローAcie Law	G	25	12	1	11.3	1.8	3.8	46.7	1.4	2.8	51.5	0.3	1.0	33.3	1.7	2.3	74.1	0.3	0.9	1.2	1.3	0.3	0.0	1.0	0.7	5.5
#32	デビン・ブラウンDevin Brown	G	31	11	0	8.5	0.7	3.3	22.2	0.4	1.7	21.1	0.4	1.5	23.5	0.0	0.0	—	0.2	1.2	1.4	0.6	0.3	0.1	0.5	0.9	1.8
#34	アーロン・グレイAaron Gray	C	25	8	0	6.3	1.0	2.6	38.1	1.0	2.6	38.1	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.9	28.6	0.6	1.4	2.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.1	1.3	2.3
#20	ジョー・アレクサンダーJoe Alexander	F	23	8	0	3.6	0.1	0.8	16.7	0.1	0.6	20.0	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.3	0.4	66.7	0.3	0.4	0.6	0.3	0.1	0.1	0.0	1.1	0.5
#31	ロブ・カーズRob Kurz	F	24	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Points per game: 97.5 #24
Points allowed per game: 99.1 #13
Offensive rating: 102.6 #27
Defensive rating: 104.2 #11
Net rating: -1.6 #18
eFG%: 47.7% #28
Turnover rate: 15.1% #15
Pace: 94.0 #12
Rebounds per game: 44.5 #1
Assists per game: 20.8 #19
Steals per game: 6.5 #24
Blocks per game: 5.8 #2

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: −4.0All-time 793/892
Defense: +2.4All-time 196/892
Diff: −1.6All-time 585/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off28/30F

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def6/30B

Off15/30C

BallKeep it / Take it

Def24/30E

Off17/30D

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def6/30B

Off20/30D

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def12/30C

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	47.7%	28/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	48.4%	6/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	15.1%	15/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	14.0%	24/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	30.3%	17/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	29.1%	6/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	28.7%	20/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	28.4%	12/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	CHI	31	51	.378	12	—	11	28	22	14	23	9	7	23	11
2024-25	CHI	39	43	.476	9	Lost in the play-in	6	28	20	13	20	3	4	23	18
2023-24	CHI	39	43	.476	9	Lost in the play-in	22	16	20	22	3	14	23	7	18
2022-23	CHI	40	42	.488	10	Lost in the play-in	22	7	13	13	7	21	20	7	19
2021-22	CHI	46	36	.561	6	Lost in round 1	13	16	20	10	6	28	18	23	25
2020-21	CHI	31	41	.431	11	—	21	14	20	10	27	11	5	27	27
2019-20	CHI	22	43	.338	11	—	27	13	22	24	27	29	23	1	25
2018-19	CHI	22	60	.268	13	—	27	20	27	28	18	25	27	18	26
2017-18	CHI	27	55	.329	13	—	26	27	29	29	13	6	10	17	30
2016-17	CHI	41	41	.500	8	Lost in round 1	23	6	14	30	12	3	14	15	14
2015-16	CHI	42	40	.512	9	—	21	16	18	26	13	2	11	29	8
2014-15	CHI	50	32	.610	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	15	9	10	21	12	3	14	28	5
2013-14	CHI	48	34	.585	4	Lost in round 1	30	1	13	30	17	10	10	21	7
2012-13	CHI	45	37	.549	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	28	3	14	29	10	8	7	22	15
2011-12	CHI	50	16	.758	1	Lost in round 1	18	1	1	14	5	1	5	24	3
2010-11	CHI	62	20	.756	1	Lost in the conf finals	19	2	2	13	17	2	9	17	5
2009-10	CHI	41	41	.500	8	Lost in round 1	24	13	18	28	15	1	19	23	2
2008-09	CHI	41	41	.500	7	Lost in round 1	8	21	16	21	19	8	13	8	4
2007-08	CHI	33	49	.402	11	—	18	16	21	28	18	8	11	9	6
2006-07	CHI	49	33	.598	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	13	6	4	17	23	1	9	4	5
2005-06	CHI	41	41	.500	7	Lost in round 1	13	16	14	19	24	3	6	30	21
2004-05	CHI	47	35	.573	3	Lost in round 1	21	7	12	25	30	2	15	20	18
2003-04	CHI	23	59	.280	14	—	26	18	28	29	23	4	9	13	15
2002-03	CHI	30	52	.366	12	—	16	26	26	17	27	9	13	21	10
2001-02	CHI	21	61	.256	15	—	28	23	29	26	24	28	12	17	23
2000-01	CHI	15	67	.183	15	—	29	19	29	28	21	29	12	7	24
1999-00	CHI	17	65	.207	15	—	29	9	28	29	29	25	26	14	18
1998-99	CHI	13	37	.260	15	—	29	14	29	29	16	26	19	12	29
1997-98	CHI	62	20	.756	1	Champion	9	3	3	19	5	2	7	10	23
1996-97	CHI	69	13	.841	1	Champion	1	6	1	5	2	2	2	7	25
1995-96	CHI	72	10	.878	1	Champion	1	2	1	4	4	4	5	3	21
1994-95	CHI	47	35	.573	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	12	5	5	9	10	11	10	2	23
1993-94	CHI	55	27	.671	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	22	3	11	9	12	12	7	12	23
1992-93	CHI	57	25	.695	2	Champion	14	2	4	8	1	12	6	5	15
1991-92	CHI	67	15	.817	1	Champion	5	3	1	3	2	13	3	17	9
1990-91	CHI	61	21	.744	1	Champion	7	4	1	1	2	15	3	4	12
1989-90	CHI	55	27	.671	3	Lost in the conf finals	9	12	9	3	10	21	7	2	16
1988-89	CHI	47	35	.573	6	Lost in the conf finals	17	5	13	5	10	22	6	14	21
1987-88	CHI	50	32	.610	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	19	1	9	9	4	6	9	11	8
1986-87	CHI	40	42	.488	8	Lost in round 1	20	2	9	18	3	9	12	17	10
1985-86	CHI	30	52	.366	8	Lost in round 1	13	17	21	17	10	11	19	21	12
1984-85	CHI	38	44	.463	7	Lost in round 1	15	11	14	7	9	19	20	19	10
1983-84	CHI	27	55	.329	10	—	20	9	23	21	19	14	16	13	9
1982-83	CHI	28	54	.341	9	—	9	22	20	17	22	4	15	18	17
1981-82	CHI	34	48	.415	9	—	15	11	17	—	22	6	14	22	7
1980-81	CHI	45	37	.549	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	10	11	7	—	20	6	21	12	6
1979-80	CHI	30	52	.366	8	—	17	14	17	—	19	19	9	18	13
1978-79	CHI	31	51	.378	11	—	22	6	19	—	21	7	8	22	20
1977-78	CHI	40	42	.488	8	—	20	5	14	—	12	14	8	18	20
1976-77	CHI	44	38	.537	5	Lost in round 1	21	1	9	—	3	4	9	16	16
1975-76	CHI	24	58	.293	9	—	18	1	17	—	3	3	15	16	18
1974-75	CHI	47	35	.573	2	Lost in the conf finals	18	1	4	—	3	7	15	12	6
1973-74	CHI	54	28	.659	3	Lost in the conf finals	12	2	4	—	9	14	14	6	11
1972-73	CHI	51	31	.622	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	13	3	5	—	—	—	11	—	—
1971-72	CHI	57	25	.695	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	6	1	3	—	—	—	4	—	—
1970-71	CHI	51	31	.622	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	12	2	2	—	—	—	4	—	—
1969-70	CHI	39	43	.476	3	Lost in the div semifinals	10	6	8	—	—	—	4	—	—
1968-69	CHI	33	49	.402	5	—	14	3	10	—	—	—	14	—	—
1967-68	CHI	29	53	.354	4	Lost in the div semifinals	12	3	10	—	—	—	12	—	—
1966-67	CHI	33	48	.407	4	Lost in the div semifinals	9	5	8	—	—	—	6	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

CHI シカゴ・ブルズChicago Bulls 2009-10

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2009-10 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

CHI シカゴ・ブルズChicago Bulls 2009-10

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2009-10 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary