POR ポートランド・トレイルブレイザーズPortland Trail Blazers 2015-16

Record: 44W38L
Conference: West 5
Playoffs: Lost in the conf semifinals
League: 12

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2015-16 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 14-2vs LAC#4
1. @−20
2. @−21
3. +8
4. +14
5. @+10
6. +3
Conf semifinals1-4vs GSW#1
1. @−12
2. @−11
3. +12
4. −7
5. @−4

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

1414121111916

Points

19221010912

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#8	アルファルーク・アミヌAl-Farouq Aminu	F	25	82	82	28.5	3.6	8.8	41.6	2.1	4.5	46.8	1.5	4.3	36.1	1.4	1.9	73.7	1.2	4.9	6.1	1.7	0.9	0.6	1.5	2.1	10.2
#24	メイソン・プラムリーMason Plumlee	C/F	25	82	82	25.4	3.3	6.3	51.6	3.3	6.3	52.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.6	4.1	64.2	2.5	5.2	7.7	2.8	0.8	1.0	1.9	3.1	9.1
#23	アレン・クラッブAllen Crabbe	G	23	81	8	26.0	3.8	8.4	45.9	2.5	4.9	50.6	1.4	3.5	39.3	1.2	1.4	86.7	0.3	2.3	2.7	1.2	0.8	0.2	0.8	2.4	10.3
#17	エド・デイビスEd Davis	F/C	26	81	0	20.8	2.5	4.2	61.1	2.5	4.2	61.1	0.0	0.0	—	1.4	2.5	55.9	2.8	4.6	7.4	1.1	0.7	0.9	0.8	2.5	6.5
#3	CJ・マッカラムCJ McCollum	G	24	80	80	34.8	8.0	17.9	44.8	5.6	12.0	46.3	2.5	5.9	41.7	2.3	2.8	82.7	0.6	2.7	3.2	4.3	1.2	0.3	2.5	2.3	20.8
#4	モーリス・ハークレスMaurice Harkless	F	22	78	14	18.7	2.5	5.3	47.4	2.0	3.5	57.6	0.5	1.8	27.9	0.9	1.4	62.2	1.3	2.3	3.6	0.9	0.6	0.4	0.8	1.6	6.4
#21	ノア・バンリーNoah Vonleh	F	20	78	56	15.1	1.5	3.6	42.1	1.4	3.0	45.7	0.1	0.6	23.9	0.5	0.7	74.5	1.2	2.7	3.9	0.4	0.3	0.3	0.6	1.9	3.6
#0	デイミアン・リラードDamian Lillard	G	25	75	75	35.7	8.2	19.7	41.9	5.2	11.5	45.0	3.1	8.1	37.5	5.5	6.2	89.2	0.6	3.4	4.0	6.8	0.9	0.4	3.2	2.2	25.1
#9	ジェラルド・ヘンダーソンJr.Gerald Henderson	G	28	72	0	19.9	3.2	7.3	43.9	2.6	5.5	46.8	0.7	1.9	35.3	1.6	2.0	76.7	0.4	2.5	2.9	1.0	0.5	0.3	0.9	1.2	8.7
#11	マイヤーズ・レナードMeyers Leonard	F/C	23	61	10	21.9	3.2	7.1	44.8	1.8	3.4	52.7	1.4	3.7	37.7	0.6	0.8	76.1	0.8	4.3	5.1	1.5	0.1	0.3	1.3	3.0	8.4
#10	ティム・フレイジャーTim Frazier	G	25	35	1	7.8	0.6	1.7	33.3	0.5	1.2	39.5	0.1	0.5	17.6	0.2	0.4	53.3	0.3	0.8	1.1	1.2	0.3	0.0	0.8	0.9	1.5
#5	パット・コナートンPat Connaughton	G	23	34	0	4.2	0.4	1.4	26.5	0.2	0.8	28.6	0.1	0.6	23.8	0.1	0.1	100.0	0.3	0.6	0.9	0.3	0.1	0.0	0.3	0.2	1.1
#2	ブライアン・ロバーツBrian Roberts	G	30	21	0	6.5	1.1	2.4	46.0	0.8	1.7	48.6	0.3	0.7	40.0	0.4	0.5	80.0	0.1	0.5	0.6	0.8	0.1	0.0	0.3	0.6	2.9
#35	クリス・ケイマンChris Kaman	C	33	16	2	7.0	1.3	2.7	46.5	1.2	2.4	48.7	0.1	0.3	25.0	0.2	0.2	100.0	0.4	1.1	1.5	0.7	0.1	0.1	0.5	0.9	2.8
#44	ルイス・モンターオLuis Montero	G	22	12	0	3.5	0.4	1.6	26.3	0.3	0.8	40.0	0.1	0.8	11.1	0.3	0.3	75.0	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.1	1.2
#34	クリフ・アレクサンダーCliff Alexander	F	20	8	0	4.5	0.6	1.3	50.0	0.6	1.3	50.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.5	0.8	0.0	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.1	1.3

Points per game: 105.1 #6
Points allowed per game: 104.3 #20
Offensive rating: 107.6 #6
Defensive rating: 106.8 #19
Net rating: +0.8 #13
eFG%: 51.1% #8
Turnover rate: 15.0% #17
Pace: 97.1 #12
Rebounds per game: 45.5 #5
Assists per game: 21.3 #21
Steals per game: 6.9 #25
Blocks per game: 4.6 #18

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: +2.0All-time 239/892
Defense: −1.3All-time 580/892
Diff: +0.8All-time 420/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off8/30B

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def15/30C

Off18/30D

BallKeep it / Take it

Def26/30E

Off10/30C

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def12/30C

Off18/30D

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def28/30F

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	51.1%	8/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	50.3%	15/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	15.0%	18/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	13.6%	26/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	29.4%	10/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	27.2%	12/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	26.8%	18/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	30.7%	28/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionFinalsPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	POR	42	40	.512	8	Lost in round 1	16	16	19	21	30	6	23	18	5
2024-25	POR	36	46	.439	12	—	22	15	22	25	29	11	27	11	8
2023-24	POR	21	61	.256	15	—	29	19	27	30	28	22	30	12	27
2022-23	POR	33	49	.402	13	—	19	23	26	12	19	28	22	24	16
2021-22	POR	27	55	.329	13	—	27	27	30	25	24	26	26	8	18
2020-21	POR	42	30	.583	6	Lost in round 1	5	23	12	15	1	12	30	25	13
2019-20	POR	35	39	.473	8	Lost in round 1	6	26	19	13	3	12	30	28	2
2018-19	POR	53	29	.646	3	Lost in the conf finals	6	14	7	14	11	3	25	25	16
2017-18	POR	49	33	.598	3	Lost in round 1	16	5	9	23	8	3	30	25	7
2016-17	POR	41	41	.500	8	Lost in round 1	8	25	18	11	14	12	23	25	8
2015-16	POR	44	38	.537	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	6	20	13	9	17	5	21	25	18
2014-15	POR	51	31	.622	4	Lost in round 1	9	11	6	9	9	2	12	27	18
2013-14	POR	54	28	.659	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	4	22	8	14	4	1	9	30	14
2012-13	POR	33	49	.402	11	—	15	21	22	13	16	24	18	28	26
2011-12	POR	28	38	.424	11	—	16	18	20	16	11	25	17	11	17
2010-11	POR	48	34	.585	6	Lost in round 1	24	7	12	22	1	27	16	5	20
2009-10	POR	50	32	.610	6	Lost in round 1	21	3	11	14	2	26	21	25	24
2008-09	POR	54	28	.659	4	Lost in round 1	14	4	5	8	8	12	19	25	13
2007-08	POR	41	41	.500	10	—	27	8	17	18	6	25	18	30	20
2006-07	POR	32	50	.390	12	—	29	14	27	23	14	28	30	24	17
2005-06	POR	21	61	.256	15	—	30	18	30	26	21	30	27	24	10
2004-05	POR	27	55	.329	13	—	27	15	26	14	27	21	17	19	1
2003-04	POR	41	41	.500	10	—	21	12	18	10	13	18	12	18	8
2002-03	POR	50	32	.610	6	Lost in round 1	15	10	7	5	19	22	8	3	24
2001-02	POR	49	33	.598	6	Lost in round 1	11	8	8	10	12	9	5	5	22
2000-01	POR	50	32	.610	7	Lost in round 1	14	6	6	5	17	18	5	7	16
1999-00	POR	59	23	.720	3	Lost in the conf finals	16	3	2	2	14	13	8	15	16
1998-99	POR	35	15	.700	3	Lost in the conf finals	5	10	3	13	14	3	10	18	4
1997-98	POR	46	36	.561	6	Lost in round 1	19	10	15	14	26	4	17	28	6
1996-97	POR	49	33	.598	5	Lost in round 1	11	11	9	10	24	4	19	20	9
1995-96	POR	44	38	.537	6	Lost in round 1	16	9	10	20	22	3	21	22	12
1994-95	POR	44	38	.537	7	Lost in round 1	10	8	7	21	3	2	16	13	7
1993-94	POR	47	35	.573	7	Lost in round 1	3	18	13	21	6	3	9	10	16
1992-93	POR	51	31	.622	4	Lost in round 1	4	13	7	23	5	4	20	7	14
1991-92	POR	57	25	.695	1	Lost in the Finals	4	12	2	9	18	2	10	8	16
1990-91	POR	63	19	.768	1	Lost in the conf finals	3	16	2	4	13	5	1	11	14
1989-90	POR	59	23	.720	3	Lost in the Finals	4	19	3	18	18	1	11	11	19
1988-89	POR	39	43	.476	8	Lost in round 1	6	22	12	12	16	2	6	4	20
1987-88	POR	53	29	.646	3	Lost in round 1	2	18	4	6	10	3	6	7	21
1986-87	POR	49	33	.598	3	Lost in round 1	1	21	7	3	21	15	3	4	20
1985-86	POR	40	42	.488	6	Lost in round 1	3	20	10	7	18	20	9	1	18
1984-85	POR	42	40	.512	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	4	17	5	6	13	15	9	2	5
1983-84	POR	48	34	.585	3	Lost in round 1	6	12	6	4	12	14	17	3	13
1982-83	POR	46	36	.561	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	15	9	10	12	4	19	17	11	19
1981-82	POR	42	40	.512	8	—	9	14	11	—	7	17	13	10	17
1980-81	POR	45	37	.549	4	Lost in round 1	6	18	10	—	11	10	5	8	8
1979-80	POR	38	44	.463	6	Lost in round 1	21	2	13	—	13	9	21	18	8
1978-79	POR	45	37	.549	6	Lost in round 1	14	3	11	—	15	12	18	9	6
1977-78	POR	58	24	.707	1	Lost in the conf semifinals	12	1	1	—	8	9	11	12	14
1976-77	POR	49	33	.598	3	Champion	3	9	1	—	16	7	9	6	4
1975-76	POR	37	45	.451	7	—	10	10	14	—	18	7	3	7	5
1974-75	POR	38	44	.463	6	—	7	11	7	—	18	10	1	4	4
1973-74	POR	27	55	.329	9	—	10	16	16	—	14	10	6	1	9
1972-73	POR	21	61	.256	9	—	10	13	15	—	—	—	8	—	—
1971-72	POR	18	64	.220	9	—	15	17	17	—	—	—	4	—	—
1970-71	POR	29	53	.354	9	—	4	17	15	—	—	—	2	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

POR ポートランド・トレイルブレイザーズPortland Trail Blazers 2015-16

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2015-16 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

POR ポートランド・トレイルブレイザーズPortland Trail Blazers 2015-16

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2015-16 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary