SAS サンアントニオ・スパーズSan Antonio Spurs 2000-01

Record: 58W24L
Conference: West 1
Playoffs: Lost in the conf finals
League: 1

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2000-01 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 13-1vs MIN#8
1. +5
2. +17
3. @−9
4. @+13
Conf semifinals4-1vs DAL#4
1. +16
2. +14
3. @+14
4. @−4
5. +18
Conf finals0-4vs LAL#2
1. −14
2. −7
3. @−39
4. @−29

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

161412109818

Points

231615915

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#21	ティム・ダンカンTim Duncan	F/C	24	82	82	38.7	8.6	17.1	49.9	8.5	16.8	50.4	0.1	0.3	25.9	5.0	8.1	61.8	3.2	9.0	12.2	3.0	0.9	2.3	3.0	3.0	22.2
#1	デレック・アンダーソンDerek Anderson	G	26	82	82	34.9	5.0	12.1	41.6	3.8	9.0	42.2	1.2	3.1	39.9	4.2	4.9	85.1	0.9	3.5	4.4	3.7	1.5	0.2	2.0	2.3	15.5
#50	デビッド・ロビンソンDavid Robinson	C	35	80	80	29.6	5.0	10.3	48.6	5.0	10.3	48.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	4.4	5.9	74.7	2.6	6.0	8.6	1.5	1.0	2.5	1.5	2.7	14.4
#35	ダニー・フェリーDanny Ferry	F	34	80	29	21.1	2.2	4.7	47.5	1.4	2.7	49.3	0.9	2.0	44.9	0.3	0.4	73.3	0.7	2.1	2.8	0.9	0.4	0.3	0.6	2.1	5.6
#30	テリー・ポーターTerry Porter	G	37	80	42	21.0	2.5	5.5	44.8	1.4	2.9	46.8	1.1	2.6	42.4	1.2	1.5	79.3	0.3	2.2	2.5	3.1	0.7	0.1	1.3	1.1	7.2
#33	アントニオ・ダニエルズAntonio Daniels	G	25	79	23	26.1	3.5	7.4	46.8	2.5	5.1	49.6	0.9	2.3	40.4	1.5	2.0	77.6	0.3	1.7	2.1	3.8	0.8	0.2	1.4	1.5	9.4
#52	サマキ・ウォーカーSamaki Walker	F	24	61	1	15.8	2.0	4.1	48.0	2.0	4.1	48.2	0.0	0.0	33.3	1.3	2.0	62.9	1.1	2.9	4.0	0.5	0.2	0.7	1.1	1.7	5.3
#31	マリク・ローズMalik Rose	F	26	57	9	21.4	2.8	6.5	43.5	2.8	6.2	44.7	0.1	0.3	17.6	2.0	2.8	71.3	1.7	3.7	5.4	0.8	1.0	0.7	1.3	2.6	7.7
#6	エイブリー・ジョンソンAvery Johnson	G	35	55	20	23.5	2.4	5.5	44.7	2.4	5.3	45.2	0.0	0.1	16.7	0.7	1.1	68.3	0.4	1.2	1.5	4.3	0.6	0.1	1.1	1.6	5.6
#4	スティーブ・カーSteve Kerr	G	35	55	1	11.8	1.2	2.9	42.1	0.6	1.5	41.5	0.6	1.4	42.9	0.3	0.3	93.3	0.1	0.5	0.6	1.0	0.3	0.0	0.4	0.5	3.3
#32	ショーン・エリオットSean Elliott	F	32	52	34	23.6	2.8	6.5	43.4	1.8	4.0	43.8	1.1	2.5	42.6	1.2	1.6	71.4	0.3	2.9	3.3	1.6	0.4	0.5	1.0	1.5	7.9
#5	デリック・ディアルDerrick Dial	—	25	33	0	6.3	1.1	2.5	43.4	1.0	2.2	46.6	0.1	0.3	20.0	0.4	0.6	57.1	0.4	0.8	1.2	0.6	0.1	0.2	0.4	0.7	2.6
#3	アイラ・ニューブルIra Newble	—	26	27	6	6.8	0.8	2.0	38.2	0.6	1.7	37.0	0.1	0.3	44.4	0.3	0.6	50.0	0.5	0.8	1.3	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.3	0.7	2.0
#36	ショーネル・スコットShawnelle Scott	C	28	27	1	5.3	0.6	1.5	41.5	0.6	1.5	41.5	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.8	40.9	0.9	1.0	1.9	0.1	0.2	0.2	0.4	0.9	1.6
#2	ジャレン・ジャクソンJaren Jackson	—	33	16	0	7.1	1.0	2.5	40.0	0.6	1.4	40.9	0.4	1.1	38.9	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.7	0.8	0.4	0.3	0.0	0.2	0.8	2.4

Points per game: 96.2 #12
Points allowed per game: 88.4 #3
Offensive rating: 105.0 #6
Defensive rating: 96.6 #1
Net rating: +8.3 #1
eFG%: 49.6% #6
Turnover rate: 15.2% #6
Pace: 90.9 #24
Rebounds per game: 44.1 #9
Assists per game: 21.7 #16
Steals per game: 6.9 #24
Blocks per game: 7.0 #1

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: +3.4All-time 135/892
Defense: +4.9All-time 46/892
Diff: +8.3All-time 26/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off6/29B

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def1/29S

Off7/29B

BallKeep it / Take it

Def24/29E

Off23/29E

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def4/29B

Off1/29S

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def2/29A

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	49.6%	6/29	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	44.4%	1/29
Ball	Ball security	Lost	15.2%	7/29	Forcing turnovers	Taken	14.8%	24/29
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	29.7%	23/29	Defensive boards	Allowed	29.7%	4/29
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	37.4%	1/29	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	24.6%	2/29

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionFinalsPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	SAS	62	20	.756	2	Lost in the Finals	3	8	2	8	4	2	9	24	5
2024-25	SAS	34	48	.415	13	—	16	23	21	19	10	18	6	12	4
2023-24	SAS	22	60	.268	14	—	23	24	25	25	26	8	2	21	3
2022-23	SAS	22	60	.268	15	—	23	30	30	26	26	12	5	20	25
2021-22	SAS	34	48	.415	10	Lost in the play-in	8	23	17	21	5	8	2	11	10
2020-21	SAS	33	39	.458	10	Lost in the play-in	20	19	21	27	2	18	16	21	10
2019-20	SAS	32	39	.451	11	—	8	25	18	16	1	15	13	22	6
2018-19	SAS	48	34	.585	7	Lost in round 1	17	12	12	7	1	20	16	30	21
2017-18	SAS	47	35	.573	7	Lost in round 1	27	1	8	26	4	11	15	13	4
2016-17	SAS	61	21	.744	2	Lost in the conf finals	14	2	2	9	10	10	7	11	2
2015-16	SAS	67	15	.817	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	10	1	2	2	4	14	3	10	4
2014-15	SAS	55	27	.671	6	Lost in round 1	7	3	3	5	12	15	5	11	8
2013-14	SAS	62	20	.756	1	Champion	6	6	1	2	11	12	1	20	8
2012-13	SAS	58	24	.707	2	Lost in the Finals	4	12	4	2	16	20	1	5	9
2011-12	SAS	50	16	.758	1	Lost in the conf finals	2	16	2	1	3	9	4	20	24
2010-11	SAS	61	21	.744	1	Lost in round 1	6	14	4	1	6	12	8	14	18
2009-10	SAS	50	32	.610	7	Lost in the conf semifinals	15	8	4	7	10	9	7	26	22
2008-09	SAS	54	28	.659	3	Lost in round 1	23	2	7	5	1	18	10	30	27
2007-08	SAS	56	26	.683	3	Lost in the conf finals	27	3	8	10	4	23	20	24	24
2006-07	SAS	58	24	.707	3	Champion	14	1	1	2	4	16	11	13	9
2005-06	SAS	63	19	.768	1	Lost in the conf semifinals	20	2	1	3	7	12	10	23	5
2004-05	SAS	59	23	.720	2	Champion	18	1	1	7	7	11	13	16	1
2003-04	SAS	57	25	.695	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	19	1	1	13	11	3	19	11	3
2002-03	SAS	60	22	.732	1	Champion	12	3	3	4	23	11	22	17	1
2001-02	SAS	58	24	.707	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	10	3	3	8	14	13	27	18	3
2000-01	SAS	58	24	.707	1	Lost in the conf finals	12	3	1	6	7	9	16	24	1
1999-00	SAS	53	29	.646	4	Lost in round 1	21	1	3	10	11	8	16	18	2
1998-99	SAS	37	13	.740	1	Champion	13	3	1	12	12	4	6	15	1
1997-98	SAS	56	26	.683	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	23	1	8	9	20	3	12	29	2
1996-97	SAS	20	62	.244	13	—	27	19	28	25	9	24	24	18	9
1995-96	SAS	59	23	.720	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	6	10	4	6	5	6	4	13	3
1994-95	SAS	62	20	.756	1	Lost in the conf finals	4	12	4	7	6	4	12	15	8
1993-94	SAS	55	27	.671	4	Lost in round 1	20	2	4	8	3	2	21	27	10
1992-93	SAS	49	33	.598	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	12	8	8	5	6	20	15	25	6
1991-92	SAS	47	35	.573	5	Lost in round 1	16	4	9	15	16	4	16	11	4
1990-91	SAS	55	27	.671	2	Lost in round 1	9	5	6	12	26	2	9	16	2
1989-90	SAS	56	26	.683	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	17	5	8	15	20	9	15	5	1
1988-89	SAS	21	61	.256	11	—	19	19	22	22	24	21	16	1	12
1987-88	SAS	31	51	.378	8	Lost in round 1	3	23	19	5	16	16	3	5	9
1986-87	SAS	28	54	.341	11	—	14	16	21	15	12	12	8	3	21
1985-86	SAS	35	47	.427	8	Lost in round 1	10	17	14	3	22	18	7	4	13
1984-85	SAS	41	41	.500	6	Lost in round 1	5	19	10	2	16	11	4	6	11
1983-84	SAS	37	45	.451	9	—	2	22	13	3	9	2	3	13	6
1982-83	SAS	53	29	.646	2	Lost in the conf finals	3	13	6	2	6	2	5	17	10
1981-82	SAS	48	34	.585	2	Lost in the conf finals	3	18	7	—	1	1	4	21	4
1980-81	SAS	52	30	.634	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	3	17	6	—	13	1	13	16	1
1979-80	SAS	41	41	.500	4	Lost in round 1	1	22	11	—	15	12	2	13	19
1978-79	SAS	48	34	.585	2	Lost in the conf finals	1	20	1	—	14	11	4	5	6
1977-78	SAS	52	30	.634	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	17	4	—	12	20	4	12	2
1976-77	SAS	44	38	.537	4	Lost in round 1	1	22	12	—	18	20	3	7	2

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

SAS サンアントニオ・スパーズSan Antonio Spurs 2000-01

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2000-01 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

SAS サンアントニオ・スパーズSan Antonio Spurs 2000-01

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2000-01 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary