DET デトロイト・ピストンズDetroit Pistons 2003-04

Record: 54W28L
Conference: East 3
Playoffs: Champion
League: 6

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2003-04 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 14-1vs MIL#6
1. +26
2. −4
3. @+10
4. @+17
5. +14
Conf semifinals4-3vs NJN#2
1. +22
2. +15
3. @−18
4. @−15
5. −7
6. @+6
7. +21
Conf finals4-2vs IND#1
1. @−4
2. @+5
3. +7
4. −15
5. @+18
6. +4
Finals4-1vs LAL#2
1. @+12
2. @−8
3. +20
4. +8
5. +13

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

1514141419

Points

1019181191014

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#22	テイショーン・プリンスTayshaun Prince	F	23	82	80	33.0	4.1	8.8	46.7	3.4	6.9	49.6	0.7	1.9	36.3	1.3	1.7	76.6	1.1	3.6	4.8	2.3	0.8	0.8	1.5	1.8	10.3
#3	ベン・ウォレスBen Wallace	F/C	29	81	81	37.7	3.9	9.2	42.1	3.9	9.1	42.4	0.0	0.1	12.5	1.8	3.6	49.0	4.0	8.4	12.4	1.7	1.8	3.0	1.5	2.0	9.5
#34	コーリス・ウィリアムソンCorliss Williamson	F	30	79	0	19.9	3.8	7.6	50.5	3.8	7.6	50.5	0.0	0.0	—	1.8	2.5	73.1	1.1	2.1	3.2	0.7	0.4	0.3	1.4	2.6	9.5
#32	リチャード・ハミルトンRichard Hamilton	G/F	25	78	78	35.6	6.8	14.9	45.5	6.6	14.1	46.6	0.2	0.9	26.5	3.8	4.4	86.8	1.0	2.6	3.6	4.0	1.3	0.2	2.7	2.8	17.6
#1	チャウンシー・ビラップスChauncey Billups	G	27	78	78	35.4	5.0	12.8	39.4	3.4	8.5	39.6	1.7	4.3	38.8	5.2	5.9	87.8	0.4	3.1	3.5	5.7	1.1	0.1	2.4	2.3	16.9
#13	メメット・オカーMehmet Okur	C	24	71	33	22.3	3.5	7.6	46.3	3.3	7.0	47.2	0.3	0.7	37.5	2.3	2.9	77.5	2.3	3.7	5.9	1.0	0.5	0.9	1.4	1.9	9.6
#41	エルデン・キャンベルElden Campbell	C/F	35	65	27	13.7	2.1	4.8	43.9	2.1	4.8	43.9	0.0	0.0	—	1.3	1.9	68.5	0.8	2.4	3.2	0.7	0.3	0.8	1.0	2.1	5.6
#8	ダービン・ハムDarvin Ham	F/G	30	54	2	8.9	0.7	1.4	49.3	0.7	1.4	49.3	0.0	0.0	50.0	0.4	0.6	60.0	0.9	0.9	1.7	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.6	1.2	1.8
#5	ボブ・サーアBob Sura	G	30	53	0	13.3	1.3	3.3	41.0	1.2	2.6	45.3	0.2	0.7	25.0	0.9	1.3	69.6	0.6	1.4	1.9	1.7	0.7	0.2	0.7	1.6	3.8
#7	チャッキー・アトキンスChucky Atkins	G	29	40	0	18.8	2.2	5.9	37.4	1.2	2.6	43.8	1.1	3.3	32.3	0.8	1.1	72.1	0.2	1.1	1.2	2.4	0.5	0.0	1.2	1.5	6.2
#24	トレメイン・フォウルクズTremaine Fowlkes	F	27	36	0	7.3	0.4	1.3	31.3	0.4	1.1	35.0	0.0	0.2	12.5	0.4	0.5	72.2	0.5	1.0	1.5	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.3	1.0	1.2
#31	ダーコ・ミリチッチDarko Milicic	F/C	18	34	0	4.7	0.5	1.9	26.2	0.5	1.9	26.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.4	0.7	58.3	0.3	0.9	1.3	0.2	0.2	0.4	0.4	1.0	1.4
#10	リンジー・ハンターLindsey Hunter	G	33	33	8	20.0	1.5	4.3	34.3	1.1	2.8	37.6	0.4	1.5	28.0	0.2	0.2	62.5	0.4	1.6	2.0	2.6	1.2	0.2	1.0	1.4	3.5
#7	マイク・ジェームズMike James	G	28	26	0	19.7	2.3	5.7	40.1	1.5	3.5	42.4	0.8	2.1	36.4	1.0	1.2	84.4	0.3	1.9	2.2	3.7	1.0	0.0	1.6	1.7	6.3
#30	ラシード・ウォレスRasheed Wallace	F/C	29	22	21	30.6	5.5	12.8	43.1	4.5	9.6	46.7	1.0	3.1	31.9	1.7	2.5	70.4	1.5	5.6	7.0	1.8	1.1	2.0	1.3	2.7	13.7
#39	ゼルジコ・レブラカZeljko Rebraca	C	31	21	2	10.5	1.0	2.6	40.7	1.0	2.6	40.7	0.0	0.0	—	1.0	1.3	78.6	0.9	1.4	2.3	0.2	0.2	0.4	0.6	2.1	3.1
#44	ヒューバート・デイビスHubert Davis	G	33	3	0	7.7	0.0	0.7	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.3	1.3	0.0

Points per game: 90.1 #24
Points allowed per game: 84.3 #1
Offensive rating: 100.3 #19
Defensive rating: 93.9 #2
Net rating: +6.5 #2
eFG%: 46.1% #20
Turnover rate: 16.8% #20
Pace: 89.3 #22
Rebounds per game: 42.8 #11
Assists per game: 20.8 #15
Steals per game: 8.0 #13
Blocks per game: 7.0 #1

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: −1.1All-time 568/892
Defense: +7.5All-time 5/892
Diff: +6.5All-time 74/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off21/29D

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def2/29A

Off20/29D

BallKeep it / Take it

Def5/29B

Off9/29C

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def15/29C

Off6/29B

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def3/29A

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	46.1%	21/29	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	44.1%	2/29
Ball	Ball security	Lost	16.8%	20/29	Forcing turnovers	Taken	17.8%	5/29
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	33.2%	9/29	Defensive boards	Allowed	31.4%	15/29
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	32.8%	6/29	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	27.1%	3/29

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionFinalsPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	DET	60	22	.732	1	Lost in the conf semifinals	8	3	3	16	20	7	10	1	1
2024-25	DET	44	38	.537	6	Lost in round 1	11	14	13	16	21	11	14	17	8
2023-24	DET	14	68	.171	15	—	27	26	28	28	28	16	22	29	19
2022-23	DET	17	65	.207	15	—	29	27	29	27	24	21	27	20	27
2021-22	DET	23	59	.280	14	—	28	22	26	30	20	24	24	9	14
2020-21	DET	20	52	.278	15	—	27	10	25	25	25	25	18	17	8
2019-20	DET	20	46	.303	13	—	25	15	23	19	24	30	16	20	21
2018-19	DET	41	41	.500	8	Lost in round 1	25	7	17	27	11	18	26	22	29
2017-18	DET	39	43	.476	9	—	22	6	19	21	6	16	15	13	27
2016-17	DET	37	45	.451	10	—	26	7	21	27	2	4	23	25	29
2015-16	DET	44	38	.537	8	Lost in round 1	19	12	14	22	9	2	27	24	29
2014-15	DET	32	50	.390	12	—	17	14	20	24	8	4	16	16	12
2013-14	DET	29	53	.354	11	—	14	27	24	24	12	2	24	7	12
2012-13	DET	29	53	.354	11	—	22	18	25	19	23	13	22	25	16
2011-12	DET	25	41	.379	10	—	27	14	25	28	28	26	28	23	26
2010-11	DET	30	52	.366	11	—	22	16	23	17	1	30	17	14	30
2009-10	DET	27	55	.329	12	—	29	13	27	29	6	26	26	13	27
2008-09	DET	39	43	.476	8	Lost in round 1	28	8	17	25	2	16	16	29	19
2007-08	DET	59	23	.720	2	Lost in the conf finals	16	1	2	15	1	21	10	17	3
2006-07	DET	53	29	.646	1	Lost in the conf finals	21	2	6	21	1	18	12	17	1
2005-06	DET	64	18	.780	1	Lost in the conf finals	19	3	2	7	1	18	2	16	2
2004-05	DET	54	28	.659	2	Lost in the Finals	24	2	6	23	10	4	11	20	3
2003-04	DET	54	28	.659	3	Champion	24	1	2	20	18	9	15	13	1
2002-03	DET	50	32	.610	1	Lost in the conf finals	25	1	5	14	5	25	23	28	7
2001-02	DET	50	32	.610	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	18	6	10	5	15	29	18	14	1
2000-01	DET	32	50	.390	10	—	13	24	19	26	25	1	23	19	11
1999-00	DET	42	40	.512	7	Lost in round 1	2	25	12	6	18	22	22	11	29
1998-99	DET	29	21	.580	5	Lost in round 1	19	6	6	10	18	20	20	6	22
1997-98	DET	37	45	.451	11	—	20	9	13	20	8	16	25	14	25
1996-97	DET	54	28	.659	5	Lost in round 1	24	2	6	4	1	28	28	21	29
1995-96	DET	46	36	.561	6	Lost in round 1	25	2	9	14	7	17	28	29	20
1994-95	DET	28	54	.341	12	—	19	22	25	15	17	25	15	8	11
1993-94	DET	20	62	.244	13	—	24	19	26	20	7	24	25	25	26
1992-93	DET	40	42	.488	10	—	25	7	20	24	3	8	22	25	27
1991-92	DET	48	34	.585	5	Lost in round 1	26	1	10	20	7	11	20	26	23
1990-91	DET	50	32	.610	3	Lost in the conf finals	24	1	9	19	2	10	23	27	23
1989-90	DET	59	23	.720	1	Champion	19	1	4	13	5	9	17	27	13
1988-89	DET	63	19	.768	1	Champion	16	2	4	6	11	7	17	25	17
1987-88	DET	54	28	.659	2	Lost in the Finals	8	3	3	7	9	5	14	22	17
1986-87	DET	52	30	.634	3	Lost in the conf finals	8	10	6	8	15	1	16	20	10
1985-86	DET	46	36	.561	5	Lost in round 1	7	15	8	15	3	4	3	11	21
1984-85	DET	46	36	.561	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	3	18	6	19	4	1	5	12	15
1983-84	DET	49	33	.598	4	Lost in round 1	3	18	5	19	2	1	4	10	11
1982-83	DET	37	45	.451	8	—	5	17	14	18	13	5	13	15	4
1981-82	DET	39	43	.476	7	—	6	20	15	—	21	8	15	8	2
1980-81	DET	21	61	.256	11	—	23	7	22	—	23	20	23	1	7
1979-80	DET	16	66	.195	11	—	11	21	22	—	22	13	19	8	3
1978-79	DET	30	52	.366	8	—	10	18	16	—	10	13	12	4	5
1977-78	DET	38	44	.463	9	—	10	15	15	—	22	13	20	3	18
1976-77	DET	44	38	.537	5	Lost in round 1	6	20	14	—	15	19	8	5	7
1975-76	DET	36	46	.439	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	9	12	12	—	7	13	14	5	13
1974-75	DET	40	42	.488	5	Lost in round 1	17	4	14	—	7	18	10	11	6
1973-74	DET	52	30	.634	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	11	4	2	—	11	9	12	1	6
1972-73	DET	40	42	.488	5	—	6	10	8	—	—	—	16	—	—
1971-72	DET	26	56	.317	8	—	10	15	14	—	—	—	17	—	—
1970-71	DET	45	37	.549	6	—	13	5	10	—	—	—	17	—	—
1969-70	DET	31	51	.378	7	—	13	5	13	—	—	—	14	—	—
1968-69	DET	32	50	.390	6	—	5	13	11	—	—	—	12	—	—
1967-68	DET	40	42	.488	4	Lost in the div semifinals	4	10	9	—	—	—	10	—	—
1966-67	DET	30	51	.370	5	—	10	4	9	—	—	—	10	—	—
1965-66	DET	22	58	.275	5	—	9	6	9	—	—	—	9	—	—
1964-65	DET	31	49	.388	4	—	7	5	7	—	—	—	7	—	—
1963-64	DET	23	57	.288	5	—	8	7	9	—	—	—	7	—	—
1962-63	DET	34	46	.425	3	Lost in the div semifinals	6	5	7	—	—	—	8	—	—
1961-62	DET	37	43	.463	3	Lost in the div finals	7	3	6	—	—	—	9	—	—
1960-61	DET	34	45	.430	3	Lost in the div semifinals	5	7	6	—	—	—	5	—	—
1959-60	DET	30	45	.400	2	Lost in the div semifinals	6	3	6	—	—	—	7	—	—
1958-59	DET	28	44	.389	3	Lost in the div semifinals	6	2	5	—	—	—	8	—	—
1957-58	DET	33	39	.458	2	Lost in the div finals	5	6	7	—	—	—	8	—	—
1956-57	FTW	34	38	.472	1	Lost in the div semifinals	7	4	8	—	—	—	4	—	—
1955-56	FTW	37	35	.514	1	Lost in the Finals	8	1	2	—	—	—	3	—	—
1954-55	FTW	43	29	.597	1	Lost in the Finals	5	2	1	—	—	—	5	—	—
1953-54	FTW	40	32	.556	3	Lost in the div semifinals	8	2	5	—	—	—	3	—	—
1952-53	FTW	36	33	.522	3	Lost in the div finals	7	5	6	—	—	—	6	—	—
1951-52	FTW	29	37	.439	5	Lost in the div semifinals	9	2	8	—	—	—	6	—	—
1950-51	FTW	32	36	.471	3	Lost in the div semifinals	7	9	7	—	—	—	10	—	—
1949-50	FTW	40	28	.588	3	Lost in the div semifinals	11	8	7	—	—	—	9	—	—
1948-49	FTW	22	38	.367	5	—	12	3	9	—	—	—	7	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

DET デトロイト・ピストンズDetroit Pistons 2003-04

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2003-04 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

DET デトロイト・ピストンズDetroit Pistons 2003-04

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2003-04 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary