PHI フィラデルフィア・セブンティシクサーズPhiladelphia 76ers 2000-01

Record: 56W26L
Conference: East 1
Playoffs: Lost in the Finals
League: 2

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2000-01 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 13-1vs IND#8
1. −1
2. +18
3. @+5
4. @+3
Conf semifinals4-3vs TOR#5
1. −3
2. +5
3. @−24
4. @+5
5. +33
6. @−12
7. +1
Conf finals4-3vs MIL#2
1. +8
2. −14
3. @−6
4. @+6
5. +1
6. @−10
7. +17
Finals1-4vs LAL#2
1. @+6
2. @−9
3. −5
4. −14
5. −12

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

151312129921

Points

28911919

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#9	ジョージ・リンチGeorge Lynch	F	30	82	80	32.3	3.3	7.5	44.5	3.2	6.8	46.3	0.2	0.7	26.3	1.5	2.1	71.9	2.4	4.8	7.2	1.7	1.2	0.4	1.3	2.7	8.4
#8	アーロン・マッキーAaron McKie	G	28	76	33	31.5	4.4	9.4	47.3	3.8	7.2	52.4	0.7	2.2	31.2	2.0	2.6	76.8	0.4	3.7	4.1	5.0	1.4	0.1	2.7	2.3	11.6
#40	タイロン・ヒルTyrone Hill	F	32	76	75	31.1	3.7	7.7	47.4	3.7	7.7	47.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.3	3.6	63.0	3.1	5.9	9.0	0.6	0.5	0.4	1.7	3.2	9.6
#3	アレン・アイバーソンAllen Iverson	G	25	71	71	42.0	10.7	25.5	42.0	9.4	21.2	44.1	1.4	4.3	32.0	8.2	10.1	81.4	0.7	3.1	3.8	4.6	2.5	0.3	3.3	2.1	31.1
#33	ジャメイン・ジョーンズJumaine Jones	C	21	65	0	13.3	1.9	4.2	44.4	1.6	3.3	47.4	0.3	0.9	33.3	0.6	0.8	75.5	1.0	1.9	2.9	0.5	0.5	0.2	0.6	1.0	4.7
#50	トッド・マカロックTodd MacCulloch	C	25	63	3	9.5	1.7	2.9	58.9	1.7	2.9	58.9	0.0	0.0	—	0.7	1.0	63.6	1.1	1.6	2.7	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.4	1.5	4.1
#5	ケビン・オリーKevin Ollie	G	28	51	4	15.0	1.4	3.2	43.0	1.4	3.2	43.2	0.0	0.1	33.3	1.0	1.4	72.9	0.3	1.2	1.4	2.4	0.5	0.0	0.8	1.4	3.8
#42	テオ・ラトリフTheo Ratliff	—	27	50	50	36.0	4.6	9.1	49.9	4.6	9.1	49.9	0.0	0.0	—	3.3	4.3	76.0	2.5	5.8	8.3	1.2	0.6	3.7	2.5	3.3	12.4
#20	エリック・スノウEric Snow	G	27	50	50	34.8	3.6	8.7	41.8	3.5	8.3	42.5	0.1	0.4	26.3	2.4	3.1	79.2	0.5	2.8	3.3	7.4	1.5	0.1	2.5	2.5	9.8
#7	トニー・クーコッチToni Kukoc	F	32	48	5	20.4	3.1	6.9	45.8	2.5	5.3	47.2	0.7	1.6	41.0	1.1	1.8	59.1	1.0	2.4	3.4	1.9	0.7	0.1	1.3	1.3	8.0
#23	ロドニー・ビュフォードRodney Buford	G/F	23	47	0	12.2	2.2	5.1	43.2	1.9	4.3	43.3	0.3	0.8	42.1	0.5	0.6	82.8	0.3	1.2	1.6	0.4	0.4	0.1	0.6	1.4	5.3
#52	マット・ガイガーMatt Geiger	C	31	35	4	15.5	2.5	6.4	39.3	2.5	6.3	39.6	0.0	0.1	0.0	1.1	1.5	68.5	1.4	2.5	4.0	0.4	0.3	0.2	0.7	2.1	6.1
#14	ナジー・モハメドNazr Mohammed	C	23	30	3	6.5	1.4	2.9	46.6	1.4	2.9	46.6	0.0	0.0	—	0.5	0.9	50.0	0.6	1.2	1.8	0.1	0.2	0.2	0.3	1.3	3.2
#55	ディケンベ・ムトンボDikembe Mutombo	C	34	26	26	33.7	3.8	7.8	49.5	3.8	7.8	49.5	0.0	0.0	—	4.0	5.3	75.9	4.6	7.8	12.4	0.8	0.3	2.5	2.0	2.5	11.7
#11	バーノン・マクスウェルVernon Maxwell	G	35	24	6	15.6	1.8	5.2	33.6	0.9	2.5	34.4	0.9	2.7	32.8	0.6	0.9	68.2	0.1	1.4	1.5	1.2	0.5	0.0	0.8	1.4	5.0
#4	ファン・イグナシオ・サンチェスPepe Sanchez	—	23	24	0	4.8	0.4	0.9	42.9	0.4	0.8	45.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.1	100.0	0.1	0.5	0.6	1.5	0.4	0.0	0.1	0.8	0.8
#11	ラジャ・ベルRaja Bell	G	24	5	0	6.0	0.4	1.4	28.6	0.2	0.8	25.0	0.2	0.6	33.3	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.2	0.0	0.4	0.2	1.0
#7	ロショーン・マクロードRoshown McLeod	—	25	1	0	15.0	1.0	2.0	50.0	1.0	1.0	100.0	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	1.0	1.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	2.0	2.0
#41	アンソニー・ミラーAnthony Miller	—	29	1	0	2.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

Points per game: 94.7 #15
Points allowed per game: 90.4 #5
Offensive rating: 101.9 #14
Defensive rating: 97.3 #5
Net rating: +4.6 #4
eFG%: 46.8% #18
Turnover rate: 17.0% #23
Pace: 92.1 #19
Rebounds per game: 44.8 #4
Assists per game: 20.6 #21
Steals per game: 8.4 #5
Blocks per game: 5.0 #19

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: +0.3All-time 401/892
Defense: +4.2All-time 86/892
Diff: +4.6All-time 156/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off18/29D

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def6/29B

Off23/29E

BallKeep it / Take it

Def10/29C

Off4/29B

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def3/29A

Off3/29A

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def3/29A

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	46.8%	18/29	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	46.0%	6/29
Ball	Ball security	Lost	17.0%	23/29	Forcing turnovers	Taken	16.6%	10/29
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	33.4%	4/29	Defensive boards	Allowed	29.6%	3/29
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	35.1%	3/29	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	24.8%	3/29

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionFinalsPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	PHI	45	37	.549	7	Lost in the conf semifinals	14	19	18	26	5	17	27	6	4
2024-25	PHI	24	58	.293	13	—	26	21	25	22	8	30	29	5	20
2023-24	PHI	47	35	.573	7	Lost in round 1	15	9	9	23	2	19	24	1	6
2022-23	PHI	54	28	.659	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	14	3	3	7	13	26	16	8	13
2021-22	PHI	51	31	.622	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	18	8	10	16	2	28	20	9	6
2020-21	PHI	49	23	.681	1	Lost in the conf semifinals	14	6	5	14	20	9	22	1	2
2019-20	PHI	43	30	.589	6	Lost in round 1	20	6	10	12	9	10	8	9	9
2018-19	PHI	51	31	.622	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	4	19	11	8	25	4	4	18	9
2017-18	PHI	52	30	.634	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	7	11	4	7	30	1	2	7	8
2016-17	PHI	28	54	.341	14	—	25	24	27	21	30	23	7	3	7
2015-16	PHI	10	72	.122	15	—	29	29	30	27	29	30	20	10	3
2014-15	PHI	18	64	.220	14	—	29	20	29	29	30	19	24	1	4
2013-14	PHI	19	63	.232	14	—	19	30	30	29	30	15	15	1	25
2012-13	PHI	34	48	.415	9	—	28	10	23	21	2	20	10	18	19
2011-12	PHI	35	31	.530	8	Lost in the conf semifinals	22	3	5	19	1	7	10	11	12
2010-11	PHI	41	41	.500	7	Lost in round 1	18	12	13	18	1	13	6	8	23
2009-10	PHI	27	55	.329	13	—	22	18	24	17	17	21	17	5	7
2008-09	PHI	41	41	.500	6	Lost in round 1	22	11	15	24	14	17	24	4	10
2007-08	PHI	40	42	.488	7	Lost in round 1	23	7	14	22	12	14	23	3	10
2006-07	PHI	35	47	.427	10	—	26	11	23	24	17	24	21	13	14
2005-06	PHI	38	44	.463	9	—	7	25	22	15	12	21	18	4	14
2004-05	PHI	43	39	.524	7	Lost in round 1	10	19	17	20	23	15	20	1	24
2003-04	PHI	33	49	.402	11	—	28	10	21	24	22	24	23	13	23
2002-03	PHI	48	34	.585	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	9	15	10	23	15	16	14	1	28
2001-02	PHI	43	39	.524	6	Lost in round 1	26	2	11	29	24	4	27	5	23
2000-01	PHI	56	26	.683	1	Lost in the Finals	15	5	4	19	21	4	21	5	17
1999-00	PHI	49	33	.598	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	23	7	13	27	18	7	16	2	18
1998-99	PHI	28	22	.560	6	Lost in the conf semifinals	21	8	12	25	26	7	25	1	10
1997-98	PHI	31	51	.378	14	—	21	15	21	25	23	12	20	8	4
1996-97	PHI	22	60	.268	14	—	7	28	26	27	28	3	22	12	14
1995-96	PHI	18	64	.220	15	—	26	26	29	26	25	25	27	17	12
1994-95	PHI	24	58	.293	13	—	25	10	22	22	22	17	27	20	2
1993-94	PHI	25	57	.305	11	—	22	22	25	19	20	22	23	23	3
1992-93	PHI	26	56	.317	13	—	16	23	24	22	19	20	14	15	1
1991-92	PHI	35	47	.427	10	—	20	9	15	12	8	25	24	16	9
1990-91	PHI	44	38	.537	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	15	14	14	13	6	17	24	15	7
1989-90	PHI	53	29	.646	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	7	8	5	7	4	15	22	16	18
1988-89	PHI	46	36	.561	7	Lost in round 1	8	14	11	8	1	20	10	20	22
1987-88	PHI	36	46	.439	10	—	16	12	17	14	17	14	20	14	9
1986-87	PHI	45	37	.549	5	Lost in round 1	17	6	12	6	20	19	20	4	5
1985-86	PHI	54	28	.659	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	11	8	6	11	21	5	17	1	6
1984-85	PHI	58	24	.707	3	Lost in the conf finals	8	6	4	12	17	5	18	2	4
1983-84	PHI	52	30	.634	3	Lost in round 1	16	4	7	10	23	10	19	5	1
1982-83	PHI	65	17	.793	1	Champion	7	7	1	3	19	1	19	5	4
1981-82	PHI	58	24	.707	3	Lost in the Finals	5	7	2	—	15	20	3	2	1
1980-81	PHI	62	20	.756	1	Lost in the conf finals	4	1	1	—	21	5	1	3	2
1979-80	PHI	59	23	.720	3	Lost in the Finals	10	4	4	—	20	4	6	7	1
1978-79	PHI	47	35	.573	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	11	5	9	—	20	5	6	9	2
1977-78	PHI	55	27	.671	1	Lost in the conf finals	1	14	2	—	18	6	6	10	2
1976-77	PHI	50	32	.610	1	Lost in the Finals	5	9	3	—	21	3	12	9	1
1975-76	PHI	46	36	.561	4	Lost in round 1	4	14	7	—	15	4	17	4	7
1974-75	PHI	34	48	.415	7	—	15	9	16	—	8	6	17	18	16
1973-74	PHI	25	57	.305	8	—	16	10	17	—	5	12	15	7	17
1972-73	PHI	9	73	.110	8	—	13	17	17	—	—	—	17	—	—
1971-72	PHI	30	52	.366	5	—	5	15	12	—	—	—	11	—	—
1970-71	PHI	47	35	.573	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	6	10	7	—	—	—	9	—	—
1969-70	PHI	42	40	.512	4	Lost in the div semifinals	1	9	3	—	—	—	6	—	—
1968-69	PHI	55	27	.671	2	Lost in the div semifinals	1	8	3	—	—	—	9	—	—
1967-68	PHI	62	20	.756	1	Lost in the div finals	1	4	1	—	—	—	1	—	—
1966-67	PHI	68	13	.840	1	Champion	1	3	1	—	—	—	1	—	—
1965-66	PHI	55	25	.688	1	Lost in the div finals	4	3	2	—	—	—	2	—	—
1964-65	PHI	40	40	.500	3	Lost in the div finals	4	8	5	—	—	—	3	—	—
1963-64	PHI	34	46	.425	3	Lost in the div semifinals	3	8	7	—	—	—	6	—	—
1962-63	SYR	48	32	.600	2	Lost in the div semifinals	1	7	2	—	—	—	6	—	—
1961-62	SYR	41	39	.513	3	Lost in the div semifinals	4	4	3	—	—	—	7	—	—
1960-61	SYR	38	41	.481	3	Lost in the div finals	1	4	3	—	—	—	7	—	—
1959-60	SYR	45	30	.600	3	Lost in the div semifinals	2	6	3	—	—	—	5	—	—
1958-59	SYR	35	37	.486	3	Lost in the div finals	2	5	2	—	—	—	7	—	—
1957-58	SYR	41	31	.569	2	Lost in the div semifinals	4	4	2	—	—	—	7	—	—
1956-57	SYR	38	34	.528	2	Lost in the div finals	5	7	6	—	—	—	7	—	—
1955-56	SYR	35	37	.486	2	Lost in the div finals	5	2	4	—	—	—	6	—	—
1954-55	SYR	43	29	.597	1	Champion	6	1	2	—	—	—	2	—	—
1953-54	SYR	42	30	.583	2	Lost in the Finals	2	4	1	—	—	—	2	—	—
1952-53	SYR	47	24	.662	2	Lost in the div semifinals	3	6	3	—	—	—	7	—	—
1951-52	SYR	40	26	.606	2	Lost in the div finals	2	4	2	—	—	—	8	—	—
1950-51	SYR	32	34	.485	4	Lost in the div finals	1	7	4	—	—	—	3	—	—
1949-50	SYR	51	13	.797	1	Lost in the Finals	3	5	2	—	—	—	1	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

PHI フィラデルフィア・セブンティシクサーズPhiladelphia 76ers 2000-01

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2000-01 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

PHI フィラデルフィア・セブンティシクサーズPhiladelphia 76ers 2000-01

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2000-01 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary