BOS ボストン・セルティックスBoston Celtics 2002-03

Record: 44W38L
Conference: East 6
Playoffs: Lost in the conf semifinals
League: 13

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2002-03 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 14-2vs IND#3
1. @+3
2. @−12
3. +18
4. +10
5. @−5
6. +20
Conf semifinals0-4vs NJN#2
1. @−4
2. @−9
3. −18
4. −9

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

161612109815

Points

21271099

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#55	エリック・ウィリアムズEric Williams	G/F	30	82	79	28.7	3.1	7.0	44.2	2.6	5.7	46.7	0.5	1.3	33.6	2.5	3.3	75.0	1.7	2.9	4.7	1.7	1.0	0.2	1.2	2.9	9.1
#0	ウォルター・マッカーティWalter McCarty	F	29	82	8	23.8	2.1	5.1	41.4	1.0	2.1	48.2	1.1	3.0	36.7	0.7	1.2	62.2	0.8	2.7	3.5	1.3	1.0	0.3	0.8	2.3	6.1
#34	ポール・ピアースPaul Pierce	F/G	25	79	79	39.2	8.4	20.2	41.6	6.9	15.2	45.4	1.5	4.9	30.2	7.6	9.5	80.2	1.3	6.0	7.3	4.4	1.8	0.8	3.6	2.9	25.9
#8	アントワン・ウォーカーAntoine Walker	F	26	78	78	41.5	7.7	19.9	38.8	5.3	12.5	42.7	2.4	7.5	32.3	2.3	3.7	61.5	1.3	5.9	7.2	4.8	1.5	0.4	3.3	2.8	20.1
#7	トニー・デルクTony Delk	G	29	67	39	28.0	3.5	8.4	41.6	1.7	3.8	44.1	1.8	4.5	39.5	1.0	1.3	78.2	0.6	2.9	3.5	2.2	1.1	0.1	1.0	1.9	9.8
#4	トニー・バティTony Battie	C/F	26	67	62	25.1	3.0	5.5	53.9	3.0	5.4	54.4	0.0	0.1	20.0	1.3	1.8	74.6	2.2	4.3	6.5	0.7	0.5	1.2	0.7	2.9	7.3
#9	JR・ブレマーJ.R. Bremer	G	22	64	41	23.5	2.7	7.3	36.9	1.1	2.8	39.3	1.6	4.5	35.3	1.3	1.7	76.6	0.3	2.0	2.3	2.6	0.6	0.0	0.9	1.3	8.3
#42	ビン・ベイカーVin Baker	F	31	52	9	18.1	1.9	4.0	47.8	1.9	3.9	48.8	0.0	0.1	0.0	1.4	2.1	67.3	1.7	2.1	3.8	0.6	0.4	0.6	1.2	2.8	5.2
#11	シャモンド・ウィリアムズShammond Williams	G	27	51	2	22.9	2.6	6.6	39.6	1.5	3.5	43.6	1.1	3.1	35.2	0.9	1.1	84.2	0.2	1.9	2.2	2.5	1.2	0.1	1.2	1.6	7.3
#5	ケドリク・ブラウンKedrick Brown	G/F	21	51	5	13.1	1.2	3.4	35.7	1.1	2.6	43.9	0.1	0.8	7.7	0.4	0.6	62.5	0.9	1.9	2.7	0.4	0.7	0.3	0.5	1.3	2.8
#43	グラント・ロングGrant Long	—	36	41	1	11.9	0.7	1.7	38.6	0.7	1.6	40.3	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.4	0.6	78.3	0.6	1.4	2.0	0.6	0.2	0.0	0.5	1.5	1.8
#30	マーク・ブラントMark Blount	C	27	27	7	19.2	1.7	3.0	56.3	1.7	3.0	56.3	0.0	0.0	—	1.1	1.5	75.0	1.8	2.8	4.6	0.8	0.7	0.6	1.2	2.8	4.4
#41	ブルーノ・サンドフBruno Sundov	C	22	26	0	5.3	0.5	2.2	25.0	0.4	1.5	25.0	0.2	0.6	25.0	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.3	0.8	1.1	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.9	1.2
#12	ビンボ・コールズBimbo Coles	G	34	14	0	12.5	1.6	3.5	44.9	1.6	3.0	52.4	0.0	0.5	0.0	0.6	0.6	100.0	0.1	0.7	0.8	1.1	0.4	0.0	0.7	1.2	3.7
#45	ルーベン・ウォルコウスキーRuben Wolkowyski	F	29	7	0	3.4	0.3	0.6	50.0	0.3	0.4	66.7	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.6	25.0	0.0	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.4	0.7
#31	マイキー・ムーアMikki Moore	C	27	3	0	4.0	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.0	2.0	0.0
#11	マーク・ブライアントMark Bryant	F	37	2	0	4.5	0.0	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	0.0

Points per game: 92.7 #22
Points allowed per game: 93.1 #12
Offensive rating: 100.0 #24
Defensive rating: 100.5 #8
Net rating: -0.6 #18
eFG%: 47.0% #19
Turnover rate: 15.1% #7
Pace: 92.0 #18
Rebounds per game: 40.5 #26
Assists per game: 19.2 #27
Steals per game: 8.8 #4
Blocks per game: 3.7 #25

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: −2.2All-time 678/892
Defense: +1.7All-time 253/892
Diff: −0.6All-time 515/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off19/29D

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def13/29C

Off7/29B

BallKeep it / Take it

Def5/29B

Off29/29G

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def12/29C

Off14/29C

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def22/29D

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	47.0%	19/29	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	47.1%	13/29
Ball	Ball security	Lost	15.1%	7/29	Forcing turnovers	Taken	17.3%	5/29
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	26.6%	29/29	Defensive boards	Allowed	30.9%	12/29
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	30.6%	14/29	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	32.3%	22/29

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionFinalsPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	BOS	56	26	.683	2	Lost in round 1	19	1	4	11	1	3	27	28	11
2024-25	BOS	61	21	.744	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	8	2	3	5	2	8	16	28	4
2023-24	BOS	64	18	.780	1	Champion	2	5	1	2	1	2	14	26	1
2022-23	BOS	57	25	.695	2	Lost in the conf finals	4	4	1	4	7	7	7	25	6
2021-22	BOS	51	31	.622	2	Lost in the Finals	12	1	2	9	13	4	14	18	2
2020-21	BOS	36	36	.500	7	Lost in round 1	16	11	13	12	16	15	25	13	6
2019-20	BOS	48	24	.667	3	Lost in the conf finals	9	2	3	17	7	8	25	6	5
2018-19	BOS	49	33	.598	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	14	8	6	6	3	22	5	4	9
2017-18	BOS	55	27	.671	2	Lost in the conf finals	20	3	6	15	13	7	20	23	18
2016-17	BOS	53	29	.646	1	Lost in the conf finals	7	15	8	10	8	26	3	18	23
2015-16	BOS	48	34	.585	5	Lost in round 1	5	13	8	24	11	6	6	2	22
2014-15	BOS	40	42	.488	7	Lost in round 1	13	21	18	22	10	13	4	8	30
2013-14	BOS	25	57	.305	12	—	26	13	25	28	27	17	22	23	23
2012-13	BOS	41	40	.506	7	Lost in round 1	18	7	16	12	13	29	10	11	22
2011-12	BOS	39	27	.591	4	Lost in the conf finals	26	2	11	10	17	30	2	16	5
2010-11	BOS	56	26	.683	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	23	1	6	7	22	29	4	3	27
2009-10	BOS	50	32	.610	4	Lost in the Finals	19	5	9	5	21	29	2	2	15
2008-09	BOS	62	20	.756	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	11	3	3	2	27	8	4	7	17
2007-08	BOS	66	16	.805	1	Champion	11	2	1	5	27	12	8	5	18
2006-07	BOS	24	58	.293	15	—	22	18	24	27	27	20	24	13	16
2005-06	BOS	33	49	.402	11	—	12	20	19	4	29	25	10	17	11
2004-05	BOS	45	37	.549	4	Lost in round 1	5	22	13	3	25	24	8	8	13
2003-04	BOS	36	46	.439	8	Lost in round 1	8	20	19	5	24	27	17	2	25
2002-03	BOS	44	38	.537	6	Lost in the conf semifinals	22	12	18	19	7	26	27	3	25
2001-02	BOS	49	33	.598	3	Lost in the conf finals	12	9	9	15	5	14	20	1	28
2000-01	BOS	36	46	.439	9	—	16	20	20	14	19	26	19	3	28
1999-00	BOS	35	47	.427	10	—	9	20	19	20	15	13	21	1	28
1998-99	BOS	19	31	.380	12	—	10	22	21	14	22	10	10	4	15
1997-98	BOS	36	46	.439	12	—	13	22	22	22	22	26	14	1	20
1996-97	BOS	15	67	.183	15	—	5	29	27	24	22	21	14	2	27
1995-96	BOS	33	49	.402	11	—	5	28	21	19	16	9	20	12	15
1994-95	BOS	35	47	.427	8	Lost in round 1	11	20	18	19	13	6	20	23	20
1993-94	BOS	32	50	.390	10	—	16	21	18	16	7	20	19	21	12
1992-93	BOS	48	34	.585	4	Lost in round 1	19	8	13	13	4	16	18	17	10
1991-92	BOS	51	31	.622	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	9	8	8	7	5	6	9	21	9
1990-91	BOS	56	26	.683	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	6	15	5	2	14	2	8	16	3
1989-90	BOS	52	30	.634	4	Lost in round 1	8	11	7	6	12	3	1	26	10
1988-89	BOS	42	40	.512	8	Lost in round 1	10	10	14	9	11	11	9	21	13
1987-88	BOS	57	25	.695	1	Lost in the conf finals	3	14	1	1	6	21	1	20	14
1986-87	BOS	59	23	.720	1	Lost in the Finals	6	4	3	1	7	18	2	22	6
1985-86	BOS	67	15	.817	1	Champion	8	3	1	2	5	1	2	18	4
1984-85	BOS	63	19	.768	1	Lost in the Finals	5	4	3	3	3	3	6	17	14
1983-84	BOS	62	20	.756	1	Champion	7	4	1	6	7	3	14	15	10
1982-83	BOS	56	26	.683	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	7	10	3	8	10	3	7	6	7
1981-82	BOS	63	19	.768	1	Lost in the conf finals	4	8	1	—	12	3	7	15	2
1980-81	BOS	62	20	.756	1	Champion	8	2	3	—	16	13	6	17	2
1979-80	BOS	61	21	.744	1	Lost in the conf finals	5	6	1	—	11	11	7	6	21
1978-79	BOS	29	53	.354	10	—	16	19	21	—	17	19	16	13	21
1977-78	BOS	32	50	.390	8	—	16	8	18	—	11	3	15	22	22
1976-77	BOS	44	38	.537	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	17	12	17	—	10	1	6	22	22
1975-76	BOS	54	28	.659	1	Champion	6	6	3	—	5	1	6	18	16
1974-75	BOS	60	22	.732	1	Lost in the conf finals	3	6	2	—	11	2	2	12	15
1973-74	BOS	56	26	.683	1	Champion	4	7	3	—	13	1	3	16	12
1972-73	BOS	68	14	.829	1	Lost in the conf finals	2	6	3	—	—	—	1	—	—
1971-72	BOS	56	26	.683	1	Lost in the conf finals	3	8	5	—	—	—	1	—	—
1970-71	BOS	44	38	.537	5	—	2	13	5	—	—	—	6	—	—
1969-70	BOS	34	48	.415	6	—	10	7	9	—	—	—	11	—	—
1968-69	BOS	48	34	.585	4	Champion	10	2	2	—	—	—	5	—	—
1967-68	BOS	54	28	.659	2	Champion	8	2	3	—	—	—	9	—	—
1966-67	BOS	60	21	.741	2	Lost in the div finals	4	1	2	—	—	—	2	—	—
1965-66	BOS	54	26	.675	2	Champion	7	1	1	—	—	—	7	—	—
1964-65	BOS	62	18	.775	1	Champion	3	1	1	—	—	—	2	—	—
1963-64	BOS	59	21	.738	1	Champion	2	2	1	—	—	—	4	—	—
1962-63	BOS	58	22	.725	1	Champion	3	2	1	—	—	—	1	—	—
1961-62	BOS	60	20	.750	1	Champion	3	1	1	—	—	—	3	—	—
1960-61	BOS	57	22	.722	1	Champion	3	1	1	—	—	—	4	—	—
1959-60	BOS	59	16	.787	1	Champion	1	5	1	—	—	—	2	—	—
1958-59	BOS	52	20	.722	1	Champion	1	6	1	—	—	—	1	—	—
1957-58	BOS	49	23	.681	1	Lost in the Finals	2	2	1	—	—	—	3	—	—
1956-57	BOS	44	28	.611	1	Champion	1	5	1	—	—	—	2	—	—
1955-56	BOS	39	33	.542	2	Lost in the div semifinals	1	8	3	—	—	—	2	—	—
1954-55	BOS	36	36	.500	3	Lost in the div finals	1	8	5	—	—	—	1	—	—
1953-54	BOS	42	30	.583	2	Lost in the div finals	1	8	4	—	—	—	1	—	—
1952-53	BOS	46	25	.648	3	Lost in the div finals	1	8	5	—	—	—	1	—	—
1951-52	BOS	39	27	.591	1	Lost in the div semifinals	1	8	3	—	—	—	1	—	—
1950-51	BOS	39	30	.565	2	Lost in the div semifinals	4	7	6	—	—	—	2	—	—
1949-50	BOS	22	46	.324	6	—	9	12	11	—	—	—	2	—	—
1948-49	BOS	25	35	.417	5	—	9	8	8	—	—	—	5	—	—
1947-48	BOS	20	28	.417	3	Lost in the div semifinals	8	6	7	—	—	—	3	—	—
1946-47	BOS	22	38	.367	5	—	11	4	10	—	—	—	4	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

BOS ボストン・セルティックスBoston Celtics 2002-03

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2002-03 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

BOS ボストン・セルティックスBoston Celtics 2002-03

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2002-03 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary