LAL ロサンゼルス・レイカーズLos Angeles Lakers 2008-09

Record: 65W17L
Conference: West 1
Playoffs: Champion
League: 2

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Strong defense

Offense
weakOffense
strong

Weak defense

Offensive style

Transition

Ball
sticksBall
moves

Half court

2008-09 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Round 14-1vs UTA#8
1. +13
2. +10
3. @−2
4. @+14
5. +11
Conf semifinals4-3vs HOU#5
1. −8
2. +13
3. @+14
4. @−12
5. +40
6. @−15
7. +19
Conf finals4-2vs DEN#2
1. +2
2. −3
3. @+6
4. @−19
5. +9
6. @+27
Finals4-1vs ORL#3
1. +25
2. +5
3. @−4
4. @+8
5. @+13

@ means away

Share of minutes and points

Minutes

151512121016

Points

17259108812

#	Player	POS	Age	Played			Shooting												Rebounds			Other
#	Player	POS	Age	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
#24	コービー・ブライアントKobe Bryant	G	30	82	82	36.1	9.8	20.9	46.7	8.3	16.8	49.6	1.4	4.1	35.1	5.9	6.9	85.6	1.1	4.1	5.2	4.9	1.5	0.5	2.6	2.3	26.8
#2	デレック・フィッシャーDerek Fisher	G	34	82	82	29.8	3.6	8.4	42.4	2.1	4.7	44.6	1.5	3.7	39.7	1.3	1.6	84.6	0.3	2.0	2.3	3.2	1.2	0.1	0.9	2.3	9.9
#3	トレバー・アリーザTrevor Ariza	F	23	82	20	24.4	3.3	7.3	46.0	2.6	4.9	52.6	0.7	2.3	31.9	1.5	2.1	71.0	1.4	2.9	4.3	1.8	1.7	0.3	1.1	2.0	8.9
#16	パウ・ガソルPau Gasol	F/C	28	81	81	37.0	7.3	12.9	56.7	7.3	12.9	56.7	0.0	0.0	50.0	4.2	5.4	78.1	3.2	6.4	9.6	3.5	0.6	1.0	1.9	2.1	18.9
#18	サーシャ・ブヤチッチSasha Vujacic	G	24	80	0	16.2	1.9	5.0	38.7	0.9	2.2	41.6	1.0	2.8	36.3	0.9	1.0	92.1	0.2	1.5	1.7	1.4	1.0	0.1	0.4	1.9	5.8
#7	ラマー・オドムLamar Odom	F	29	78	32	29.7	4.4	9.0	49.2	4.0	7.7	52.2	0.4	1.3	32.0	2.1	3.3	62.3	2.3	5.9	8.2	2.6	1.0	1.3	1.8	3.0	11.3
#5	ジョーダン・ファーマーJordan Farmar	G	22	65	0	18.3	2.5	6.3	39.1	1.7	4.1	42.1	0.8	2.2	33.6	0.7	1.2	58.4	0.3	1.5	1.8	2.4	0.9	0.2	1.3	1.6	6.4
#4	ルーク・ウォルトンLuke Walton	F	28	65	34	17.9	2.1	4.7	43.6	1.8	3.8	46.8	0.3	0.9	29.8	0.6	0.9	71.9	0.8	1.9	2.8	2.7	0.5	0.2	1.1	1.6	5.0
#21	ジョシュ・パウエルJosh Powell	F/C	26	60	1	11.7	1.8	4.0	44.4	1.8	4.0	44.4	0.0	0.0	—	0.6	0.8	76.0	1.2	1.8	2.9	0.5	0.2	0.3	0.9	1.6	4.2
#17	アンドリュー・バイナムAndrew Bynum	C	21	50	50	28.9	5.6	10.0	56.0	5.6	10.0	56.0	0.0	0.0	—	3.0	4.3	70.7	2.7	5.2	8.0	1.4	0.4	1.8	1.7	3.1	14.3
#10	ウラジミール・ラドマノビッチVladimir Radmanovic	F	28	46	28	16.8	2.1	4.7	44.4	0.8	1.7	44.9	1.3	3.0	44.1	0.5	0.6	85.2	0.4	2.2	2.5	0.8	0.6	0.2	1.0	1.1	5.9
#28	DJ・エムベンガDJ Mbenga	C	28	23	0	7.9	1.2	2.5	47.4	1.2	2.4	48.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.3	87.5	0.4	1.0	1.3	0.4	0.4	1.0	0.6	1.4	2.7
#12	シャノン・ブラウンShannon Brown	G	23	18	0	7.6	1.2	2.3	52.4	0.9	1.8	48.5	0.3	0.5	66.7	0.4	0.5	88.9	0.2	0.9	1.1	0.6	0.2	0.1	0.5	0.5	3.2
#31	クリス・ミームChris Mihm	C	29	18	0	5.8	0.8	2.2	37.5	0.8	2.2	37.5	0.0	0.0	—	0.3	0.4	85.7	0.8	1.1	1.9	0.6	0.1	0.3	0.6	1.3	2.0
#9	スン・ユエSun Sun	G	23	10	0	2.8	0.3	1.1	27.3	0.3	0.5	60.0	0.0	0.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.3	1.0	0.6
#6	アダム・モリソンAdam Morrison	F	24	8	0	5.5	0.5	1.5	33.3	0.4	1.0	37.5	0.1	0.5	25.0	0.1	0.3	50.0	0.3	0.8	1.0	0.4	0.0	0.0	0.4	0.5	1.3

Points per game: 106.9 #3
Points allowed per game: 99.3 #13
Offensive rating: 111.4 #3
Defensive rating: 103.5 #6
Net rating: +7.9 #2
eFG%: 51.3% #5
Turnover rate: 14.0% #5
Pace: 95.5 #5
Rebounds per game: 43.9 #1
Assists per game: 23.3 #2
Steals per game: 8.8 #2
Blocks per game: 5.1 #10

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

Offense: +4.4All-time 80/892
Defense: +3.4All-time 121/892
Diff: +7.9All-time 38/892

Four Factors (what the record is made of)

On offenseOn defense

Off5/30B

ShootingMake them / Force misses

Def8/30B

Off5/30B

BallKeep it / Take it

Def6/30B

Off3/30A

ReboundsGrab them / Deny them

Def16/30D

Off18/30D

FoulsDraw them / Avoid them

Def9/30C

The numbers in detail

	On offense				On defense
	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank	Metric	What it measures	Value	Rank
Shooting	Shooting	eFG	51.3%	5/30	Forcing misses	Opp eFG%	49.0%	8/30
Ball	Ball security	Lost	14.0%	5/30	Forcing turnovers	Taken	16.2%	6/30
Rebounds	Offensive boards	Grabbed	32.6%	3/30	Defensive boards	Allowed	30.2%	16/30
Fouls	Drawing fouls	FT rate	29.9%	18/30	Staying out of foul trouble	Given	28.3%	9/30

Offensive boards: Sending players to the offensive glass is a choice of style — more is not better

All-time rank (every season)

ChampionFinalsPlayoff line

Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	League rank
Season	Team	W	L	Win%	Rank	Playoffs	PTS	PA	Diff	eFG%	TOV	TRB	AST	STL	BLK
2025-26	LAL	53	29	.646	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	11	11	14	2	15	27	17	14	22
2024-25	LAL	50	32	.610	3	Lost in round 1	19	10	14	8	12	26	18	22	20
2023-24	LAL	47	35	.573	8	Lost in round 1	6	23	19	5	19	18	5	18	11
2022-23	LAL	43	39	.524	7	Lost in the conf finals	6	20	16	17	15	6	15	25	16
2021-22	LAL	33	49	.402	11	—	11	27	22	15	24	18	16	11	7
2020-21	LAL	42	30	.583	7	Lost in round 1	22	2	8	18	28	16	15	10	4
2019-20	LAL	52	19	.732	1	Champion	11	4	5	5	22	9	10	5	1
2018-19	LAL	37	45	.451	10	—	16	21	23	13	29	6	11	16	6
2017-18	LAL	35	47	.427	11	—	11	25	21	16	29	2	7	13	17
2016-17	LAL	26	56	.317	14	—	17	28	30	22	26	17	26	5	27
2015-16	LAL	17	65	.207	15	—	30	27	29	30	11	21	30	23	24
2014-15	LAL	21	61	.256	14	—	17	29	27	26	5	12	20	22	18
2013-14	LAL	27	55	.329	14	—	11	29	27	13	19	25	4	18	5
2012-13	LAL	45	37	.549	7	Lost in round 1	6	22	11	9	22	4	17	25	14
2011-12	LAL	41	25	.621	3	Lost in the conf semifinals	15	15	13	13	19	2	6	30	11
2010-11	LAL	57	25	.695	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	9	8	3	11	5	3	12	14	10
2009-10	LAL	57	25	.695	1	Champion	12	9	6	15	6	2	15	11	15
2008-09	LAL	65	17	.793	1	Champion	3	13	2	6	11	1	2	1	10
2007-08	LAL	57	25	.695	1	Lost in the Finals	4	19	3	4	11	4	4	6	5
2006-07	LAL	42	40	.512	7	Lost in round 1	5	25	12	4	18	11	6	10	9
2005-06	LAL	45	37	.549	7	Lost in round 1	7	15	7	11	9	6	9	5	19
2004-05	LAL	34	48	.415	11	—	12	27	24	12	15	5	22	29	20
2003-04	LAL	56	26	.683	2	Lost in the Finals	3	15	7	7	5	6	4	10	21
2002-03	LAL	50	32	.610	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	4	23	9	9	12	4	4	15	7
2001-02	LAL	58	24	.707	3	Champion	3	9	2	4	2	3	8	18	8
2000-01	LAL	56	26	.683	2	Champion	3	23	8	2	8	5	9	24	5
1999-00	LAL	67	15	.817	1	Champion	6	6	1	13	3	1	10	18	4
1998-99	LAL	31	19	.620	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	2	25	7	2	11	13	7	23	6
1997-98	LAL	61	21	.744	2	Lost in the conf finals	1	20	1	2	14	5	4	7	3
1996-97	LAL	56	26	.683	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	8	12	8	14	6	5	11	4	1
1995-96	LAL	53	29	.646	4	Lost in round 1	7	13	6	7	3	18	2	6	4
1994-95	LAL	48	34	.585	5	Lost in the conf semifinals	7	21	15	13	6	8	5	5	3
1993-94	LAL	33	49	.402	9	—	17	19	19	25	3	17	16	7	6
1992-93	LAL	39	43	.476	8	Lost in round 1	17	14	19	16	8	24	15	5	13
1991-92	LAL	43	39	.524	8	Lost in round 1	24	5	14	25	2	26	22	8	17
1990-91	LAL	58	24	.707	3	Lost in the Finals	13	2	3	9	5	14	11	20	18
1989-90	LAL	63	19	.768	1	Lost in the conf semifinals	6	7	2	4	5	13	3	20	11
1988-89	LAL	57	25	.695	1	Lost in the Finals	5	8	3	1	13	6	2	14	13
1987-88	LAL	62	20	.756	1	Champion	5	11	2	2	7	11	3	14	15
1986-87	LAL	65	17	.793	1	Champion	2	12	1	2	10	11	1	9	8
1985-86	LAL	62	20	.756	1	Lost in the conf finals	1	10	3	1	13	7	1	15	10
1984-85	LAL	62	20	.756	1	Champion	2	14	1	1	15	9	1	11	7
1983-84	LAL	54	28	.659	1	Lost in the Finals	4	16	4	1	19	8	2	7	8
1982-83	LAL	58	24	.707	1	Lost in the Finals	2	12	2	1	15	10	1	3	9
1981-82	LAL	57	25	.695	1	Champion	2	15	4	—	13	2	1	3	5
1980-81	LAL	54	28	.659	3	Lost in round 1	5	13	5	—	15	9	2	7	4
1979-80	LAL	60	22	.732	1	Champion	2	11	2	—	18	7	1	13	4
1978-79	LAL	47	35	.573	4	Lost in the conf semifinals	8	8	4	—	7	20	3	8	8
1977-78	LAL	45	37	.549	5	Lost in round 1	7	7	5	—	4	16	5	10	11
1976-77	LAL	53	29	.646	1	Lost in the conf finals	10	4	5	—	2	14	5	10	9
1975-76	LAL	40	42	.488	6	—	3	17	8	—	7	5	7	13	1
1974-75	LAL	30	52	.366	9	—	8	17	17	—	16	4	4	4	2
1973-74	LAL	47	35	.573	2	Lost in the conf semifinals	3	12	8	—	17	3	4	1	1
1972-73	LAL	60	22	.732	1	Lost in the Finals	4	5	1	—	—	—	2	—	—
1971-72	LAL	69	13	.841	1	Champion	1	6	1	—	—	—	1	—	—
1970-71	LAL	48	34	.585	2	Lost in the conf finals	6	6	4	—	—	—	3	—	—
1969-70	LAL	46	36	.561	2	Lost in the Finals	12	2	5	—	—	—	8	—	—
1968-69	LAL	55	27	.671	1	Lost in the Finals	6	4	5	—	—	—	2	—	—
1967-68	LAL	52	30	.634	2	Lost in the Finals	2	6	2	—	—	—	4	—	—
1966-67	LAL	36	45	.444	3	Lost in the div semifinals	3	9	4	—	—	—	3	—	—
1965-66	LAL	45	35	.563	1	Lost in the Finals	1	4	3	—	—	—	1	—	—
1964-65	LAL	49	31	.613	1	Lost in the Finals	5	3	4	—	—	—	8	—	—
1963-64	LAL	42	38	.525	3	Lost in the div semifinals	7	4	5	—	—	—	5	—	—
1962-63	LAL	53	27	.663	1	Lost in the Finals	5	3	3	—	—	—	7	—	—
1961-62	LAL	54	26	.675	1	Lost in the Finals	6	2	4	—	—	—	5	—	—
1960-61	LAL	36	43	.456	2	Lost in the div finals	7	1	5	—	—	—	8	—	—
1959-60	MNL	25	50	.333	3	Lost in the div finals	8	2	7	—	—	—	8	—	—
1958-59	MNL	33	39	.458	2	Lost in the Finals	5	4	6	—	—	—	4	—	—
1957-58	MNL	19	53	.264	4	—	6	8	8	—	—	—	6	—	—
1956-57	MNL	34	38	.472	1	Lost in the div finals	2	8	5	—	—	—	8	—	—
1955-56	MNL	33	39	.458	3	Lost in the div semifinals	4	6	6	—	—	—	7	—	—
1954-55	MNL	40	32	.556	2	Lost in the div finals	2	7	3	—	—	—	8	—	—
1953-54	MNL	46	26	.639	1	Champion	3	4	2	—	—	—	8	—	—
1952-53	MNL	48	22	.686	1	Champion	5	3	1	—	—	—	9	—	—
1951-52	MNL	40	26	.606	2	Champion	5	1	1	—	—	—	7	—	—
1950-51	MNL	44	24	.647	1	Lost in the div finals	8	1	1	—	—	—	7	—	—
1949-50	MNL	51	17	.750	1	Champion	4	2	1	—	—	—	6	—	—
1948-49	MNL	44	16	.733	2	Champion	1	1	1	—	—	—	5	—	—

/* **シーズンの行は消さない**（2026-08-23。§284）——行が `<a>` になったので JS が無くても選べる（`<select>` だったころは移動に JS が要った） */ .ptabs, .rswitch, .cswitch { display: none; } /* **面だけを狙う**（`[hidden]` は行にも付いている）。選手ページと同じ字面 */ .ptabs + div > [data-pane][hidden], .rpane[hidden], .cpane[hidden] { display: block !important; }

LAL ロサンゼルス・レイカーズLos Angeles Lakers 2008-09

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2008-09 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

LAL ロサンゼルス・レイカーズLos Angeles Lakers 2008-09

Compared with the leagueHow strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary

Offensive style

2008-09 standings through the season

Playoffs run

Share of minutes and points

Team style

Shot mix

The gap to the league average, and where it sits all-time

The numbers in detail

All-time rank (every season)

How strong a team was and how it played, read as its place within that season's league.Read in the glossary